planetf1.com

I thought it would be a good idea to start an Eccelstone-inspired medals table, both out of interest, and as a good comparison to the Consistency Table thread. Personally, I am opposed to the system for the official Championship, but think it's interesting nonetheless

Table (following Malaysia):
1. Vettel: |1|0|1|
2. Raikkonen: |1|0|0|
3. Webber: |0|1|0| (6th)
4. Alonso: |0|1|0| (DNF)
5. Hamilton: |0|0|1|
6. Massa: 4th (5th)
7. Rosberg: 4th (DNF)
8. Grosjean: 6th
9. Sutil: 7th
10. Di Resta: 8th (DNF)
11. Hulkenberg: 8th (DNS)
12. Perez: 9th (11th)
13. Button: 9th (17th)
14. Vergne: 10th
15. Bottas: 11th
16. Gutierrez: 12th
17. Bianchi: 13th
18.Pic: 14th
19. Van Der Garde: 15th
20. Chilton: 16th
21. Ricciardo: 18th
22. Maldonado: DNF

Key:
|Golds|Silvers|Bronzes| - Medals
Xth - Highest finish
(Xth) - second highest finish
[Xth] - third highest finish

Inappropriate post removed.

Table (following China):

1. Raikkonen: |1|1|0| (7th)
2. Alonso: |1|1|0| (DNF)
3. Vettel: |1|0|1|
4. Webber: |0|1|0| (6th)
5. Hamilton: |0|0|2|
6. Massa: 4th (5th)
7. Rosberg: 4th (DNF)
8. Grosjean: 6th
9. Sutil: 7th
10. Di Resta: 8th (8th)
11. Hulkenberg: 8th (10th)
12. Perez: 9th (11th)
13. Button: 5th (9th)
14. Vergne: 10th
15. Bottas: 11th
16. Gutierrez: 12th
17. Bianchi: 13th (15th)
18. Maldonado: 13th (DNF)
19. Pic: 14th
20. Van Der Garde: 15th
21. Chilton: 16th
22. Ricciardo: 18th

Key:
|Golds|Silvers|Bronzes| - Medals
Xth - Highest finish
(Xth) - second highest finish
[Xth] - third highest finish

I think that's right. Let me know if not.

Surely Button and Ricciardo are wrong? Button needs moving up above grosjean, and you haven't recorded ricciado finish of 7th, putting him above Sutil

AngusWolfe wrote:Table (following China):

1. Raikkonen: |1|1|0| (7th)
2. Alonso: |1|1|0| (DNF)
3. Vettel: |1|0|1|
4. Webber: |0|1|0| (6th)
5. Hamilton: |0|0|2|
6. Massa: 4th (5th)
7. Rosberg: 4th (DNF)
8. Button: 5th (9th)
9. Grosjean: 6th
10. Ricciardo: 7th (18th)
11. Sutil: 7th
12. Di Resta: 8th (8th)
13. Hulkenberg: 8th (10th)
14. Perez: 9th (11th)
15. Vergne: 10th
16. Bottas: 11th
17. Gutierrez: 12th
18. Bianchi: 13th (15th)
19. Maldonado: 13th (DNF)
20. Pic: 14th
21. Van Der Garde: 15th
22. Chilton: 16th


Key:
|Golds|Silvers|Bronzes| - Medals
Xth - Highest finish
(Xth) - second highest finish
[Xth] - third highest finish

Right, should be good now, thanks DWilD.

Thanks, keep up the good work.

Table (following Bahrain):

1. Vettel: |2|0|1|
2. Raikkonen: |1|2|0|
3. Alonso: |1|1|0|
4. Webber: |0|1|0|
5. Hamilton: |0|0|2|
6. Grosjean: |0|0|1|
7. Massa: 4th (5th)
8. Di Resta: 4th (8th)
9. Rosberg: 4th (9th)
10. Button: 5th (9th)
11. Perez: 6th (9th)
12. Sutil: 7th (13th)
13. Ricciardo: 7th (16th)
14. Hulkenberg: 8th (10th)
15. Vergne: 10th
16. Bottas: 11th (13th) [14th]
17. Maldonado: 11th (13th) [DNF]
18. Gutierrez: 12th
19. Bianchi: 13th
20. Pic: 14th
21. Van Der Garde: 15th
22. Chilton: 16th

Key:
|Golds|Silvers|Bronzes| - Medals
Xth - Highest finish
(Xth) - second highest finish
[Xth] - third highest finish

I wrote it down instead of doing it from my head again, so should be right this week, but correct me if I'm wrong.

I know I usually do this on Sunday, but I'm currently too busy. Should be up in the next few days.

Table (following Spain):

1. Alonso: |2|1|0|
2. Vettel: |2|0|1|
3. Raikkonen: |1|3|0|
4. Webber: |0|1|0|
5. Hamilton: |0|0|2|
6. Massa: |0|0|1| 4th (5th)
7. Grosjean: |0|0|1| 6th
8. Rosberg: 4th (6th)
9. Di Resta: 4th (7th)
10. Button: 5th (8th)
11. Perez: 6th (9th)
12. Ricciardo: 7th (10th)
13. Sutil: 7th (13th)
14. Hulkenberg: 8th (10th)
15. Vergne: 10th
16. Gutierrez: 11th (12th)
17. Bottas: 11th (13th) [14th x2]
18. Maldonado: 11th (13th) [14th]
19. Bianchi: 13th
20. Pic: 14th
21. Van Der Garde: 15th
22. Chilton: 16th

Key:
|Golds|Silvers|Bronzes| - Medals
Xth - Highest finish
(Xth) - second highest finish
[Xth] - third highest finish

Apologies for the late posting, normal service should resume next week.

Please post any corrections.

How far down the positions would they have been awarded? I thought it was first 3 only, so only Vettel, Kimi, Alonso, Massa and ro gro would have any?

moby wrote:How far down the positions would they have been awarded? I thought it was first 3 only, so only Vettel, Kimi, Alonso, Massa and ro gro would have any?

After the podiums I give highest result, similar to how non-points scorers are positioned. Although I wish i had thought of not classifying guys off the podium, would make this alot easier

Apologies guys, I'm currently doing my A-Level exams, and had a lot of personal stuff going on, so I've had no time to do this... as soon as I get any, I'll update, Hopefully before Sunday's race

Monaco Update:

Drivers:
1. VET 2-1-1
2. ALO 2-1-0
3. RAI 1-3-0
4. ROS 1-0-0
5. WEB 0-1-1
6. HAM 0-0-2
7. MAS 0-0-1 4th
8. GRO 0-0-1 6th


Constructors:
1. Red Bull Renault: 2-2-2
2. Ferrari: 2-1-1
3. Lotus Renault: 1-3-1
4. Mercades AMG: 1-0-2

Shortened format this time, easier for me to fit around my busy schedule. added Constructors championship too.

Canada Update:

Drivers:
1. VET 3-1-1
2. ALO 2-2-0
3. RAI 1-3-0
4. ROS 1-0-0
5. WEB 0-1-1
6. HAM 0-0-3
7. MAS 0-0-1 4th
8. GRO 0-0-1 6th


Constructors:
1. Red Bull Renault: 3-2-3
2. Ferrari: 2-2-1
3. Lotus Renault: 1-3-1
4. Mercades AMG: 1-0-2

Britain update:

Drivers:
1. VET 3-1-1
2. ALO 2-2-1
3. ROS 2-0-0
4. RAI 1-3-0
5. WEB 0-2-1
6. HAM 0-0-3
7. MAS 0-0-1 4th
8. GRO 0-0-1 6th


Constructors:
1. Red Bull Renault: 3-3-3
2. Ferrari: 2-2-2
3. Mercades AMG: 2-0-2
4. Lotus Renault: 1-3-1

Germany update:

Drivers:
1. VET 4-1-1
2. ALO 2-2-1
3. ROS 2-0-0
4. RAI 1-4-0
5. WEB 0-2-1
6. HAM 0-0-3
7. GRO 0-0-2
8. MAS 0-0-1

Constructors:
1. Red Bull Renault: 4-3-2
2. Ferrari: 2-2-2
3. Mercades AMG: 2-0-3
4. Lotus Renault: 1-4-2

Nitpick - check third places count for RBR and Merc.

Interesting table, highlights things not normally apparent.

Irbis wrote:Nitpick - check third places count for RBR and Merc.

Interesting table, highlights things not normally apparent.

My bad, I'll do it now, thanks

Hungary update:

Drivers:
1. VET 4-1-3
2. ALO 2-2-1
3. ROS 2-0-0
4. RAI 1-5-0
5. HAM 1-0-3
6. WEB 0-2-1
7. GRO 0-0-2
8. MAS 0-0-1

Constructors:
1. Red Bull Renault: 4-3-3
2. Mercades AMG: 3-0-3
3. Ferrari: 2-2-2
4. Lotus Renault: 1-5-2

Belgium update:

Drivers:
1. VET 5-1-3
2. ALO 2-3-1
3. ROS 2-0-0
4. RAI 1-5-0
5. HAM 1-0-4
6. WEB 0-2-1
7. GRO 0-0-2
8. MAS 0-0-1

Constructors:
1. Red Bull Renault: 5-3-3
2. Mercades AMG: 3-0-4
3. Ferrari: 2-3-2
4. Lotus Renault: 1-5-2

Italy update:

Drivers:
1. VET 6-1-3
2. ALO 2-4-1
3. ROS 2-0-0
4. RAI 1-5-0
5. HAM 1-0-4
6. WEB 0-2-2
7. GRO 0-0-2
8. MAS 0-0-1

Constructors:
1. Red Bull Renault: 6-3-4
2. Mercades AMG: 3-0-4
3. Ferrari: 2-4-2
4. Lotus Renault: 1-5-2

Singapore update:

Drivers:
1. VET 7-1-3
2. ALO 2-5-1
3. ROS 2-0-0
4. RAI 1-5-1
5. HAM 1-0-4
6. WEB 0-2-2
7. GRO 0-0-2
8. MAS 0-0-1

Constructors:
1. Red Bull Renault: 7-3-4
2. Mercades AMG: 3-0-4
3. Ferrari: 2-5-2
4. Lotus Renault: 1-5-3

Japan update:

Drivers:
1. VET 9-1-3
2. ALO 2-5-1
3. ROS 2-0-0
4. RAI 1-6-1
5. HAM 1-0-4
6. WEB 0-3-2
7. GRO 0-0-4
8. MAS 0-0-1

Constructors:
1. Red Bull Renault: 9-4-4
2. Mercades AMG: 3-0-4
3. Ferrari: 2-5-2
4. Lotus Renault: 1-6-5

It's like playing spot the difference now... answers on a postcard

AngusWolfe wrote:Lotus now have more medals than Ferrari and Mercedes, yet no change. very glad this system isn't actually used. hopefully this will be more interesting next year.

Um... You first state there would be no change, then say you're glad no change system isn't used?

Anyway, maybe medals are not best system out there, but Rosberg definitely needs to be a bit higher.

Irbis wrote:

AngusWolfe wrote:Lotus now have more medals than Ferrari and Mercedes, yet no change. very glad this system isn't actually used. hopefully this will be more interesting next year.

Um... You first state there would be no change, then say you're glad no change system isn't used?

Anyway, maybe medals are not best system out there, but Rosberg definitely needs to be a bit higher.

I meant no change in positions on the table, apologies for any confusion.

I accidentally edited the Korea update instead of posting something new. so if anyone is still reading, it's up there

India update:

Drivers:
1. VET 10-1-3
2. ALO 2-5-1
3. ROS 2-1-0
4. RAI 1-6-1
5. HAM 1-0-4
6. WEB 0-3-2
7. GRO 0-0-5
8. MAS 0-0-1

Constructors:
1. Red Bull Renault: 10-4-4
2. Mercades AMG: 3-1-4
3. Ferrari: 2-5-2
4. Lotus Renault: 1-6-6

Just a quick question - who wins the title in this system? Obviously Vettel in this specific case, but what are the rules? Only going by the number of wins first, then seconds, then thirds? So a driver winning 10 races and retiring in the other 9 would be WDC, even if another driver wins 9 races and runner-up in the other 10?

mds wrote:Just a quick question - who wins the title in this system? Obviously Vettel in this specific case, but what are the rules? Only going by the number of wins first, then seconds, then thirds? So a driver winning 10 races and retiring in the other 9 would be WDC, even if another driver wins 9 races and runner-up in the other 10?

Yes, it is most wins, no matter what happens in the races that driver does not win. Second places then count if there is a tie, then 3rds, then highest non-podium position. for drivers without any medals the highest finish will determine the order in WDC, and WCC, similar to those who do not score points in the current system. Bernie Eccelstone wanted to use it for 2009 onwards but never happened. Personally I prefer the points system we have now, but I started this thread as an interesting comparison to the consistency tables. Although this season has been rather boring, there are years where this is much more interesting. For example, in 2005 where Kimi Räikkönen would have won the championship, or 1982, where Didier Pironi would have won, despite missing out on the last 5 races due to injury.

OK, thank you for the confirmation.
1982 would have been a curious case. Rosberg would suddenly be only sixth

Abu Dhabi update:

Drivers:
1. VET 11-1-3
2. ALO 2-5-1
3. ROS 2-2-0
4. RAI 1-6-1
5. HAM 1-0-4
6. WEB 0-4-2
7. GRO 0-0-5
8. MAS 0-0-1

Constructors:
1. Red Bull Renault: 11-4-5
2. Mercedes AMG: 3-2-4
3. Ferrari: 2-5-2
4. Lotus Renault: 1-6-6

Edit: spelling of quite a famous brand.

Just noticed: it's Mercedes, not Mercades

mds wrote:Just noticed: it's Mercedes, not Mercades

Indeed it is, dunno how I've gone most of the year without noticing. Thanks

USA update:

Drivers:
1. VET 12-1-3
2. ALO 2-5-1
3. ROS 2-2-0
4. RAI 1-6-1
5. HAM 1-0-4
6. WEB 0-4-3
7. GRO 0-1-5
8. MAS 0-0-1

Constructors:
1. Red Bull Renault: 12-4-6
2. Mercedes AMG: 3-2-4
3. Ferrari: 2-5-2
4. Lotus Renault: 1-7-6

Driver's Championship

Final Table (following Brazil):

1. Vettel: |13|1|2|
2. Alonso: |2|5|2|
3. Rosberg: |2|1|1|
4. Raikkonen: |1|6|3|
5. Hamilton: |1|0|4|
6. Webber: |0|5|2|
7. Massa: |0|0|1|
8. Grosjean: |0|1|5|
9. Button: 4th (5th) [6th x3]
10. Hulkenberg: 4th (5th) [6th x2]
11. Di Resta: 4th (6th)
12. Perez: 5th (6th x2)
13. Sutil: 5th (7th)
14. Vergne: 6th
15. Ricciardo: 7th x2 (8th)
16. Gutierrez: 7th
17. Bottas: 8th
18. Maldonado: 10th
19. Bianchi: 13th
20. Pic: 14th x2 (15 x2)
21. Kovalainen: 14th x2 (N/A)
22. Van Der Garde: 14th (15th x3)
23. Chilton: 14th (16)

Key:
|Golds|Silvers|Bronzes| - Medals
Xth - Highest finish
(Xth) - second highest finish
[Xth] - third highest finish[/quote]

Constructors Table to follow.

1. Red Bull Renault: 13|6|5
2. Mercedes AMG: 3|1|5
3. Scuderia Ferrari: 2|5|3
4. Lotus Renault: 1|7|6
5. McLaren Mercades: 4th (5th x2)
6. Sauber Ferrari: 4th (5) [6x2]
7. Force India Mercades: 4th (5th) [6]
8. Torro Rosso Ferrari: 6th
9. Williams Renault: 8th
10. Marussia Cosworth: 13th
11. Caterham Renault: 14th

Right, that should be it, but considoring I'm:
A. A moron, and
B. Tired, there may be a few inaccuracies, as I'm also having to use a tablet.

Yeah there are a few things wrong...
- Webber has 3 third places
- RBR's points should be 13 - 6 - 5
- Ferrari should be 2 - 5 - 3
- Merc should be 3 - 1 - 5
- Sauber should be sixth and FI seventh, as it's Sauber that scored 2 6th places and FI only one