Page 17 of 18

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 4:59 pm
by mac_d
SDLRob wrote:Just binged Defenders... very good watch. Paced very much like the rest of the shows, but it works in the 8 episodes...
Do I need to have watched Iron Fist and Luke Cage to enjoy it do you think? I watched all but one of the Luke Cage episodes and never got started with Iron Fist (loved DD and JJ).

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 11:29 pm
by huggybear
mac_d wrote:
SDLRob wrote:Just binged Defenders... very good watch. Paced very much like the rest of the shows, but it works in the 8 episodes...
Do I need to have watched Iron Fist and Luke Cage to enjoy it do you think? I watched all but one of the Luke Cage episodes and never got started with Iron Fist (loved DD and JJ).
Not really. I've seen 1 and a half seasons of Daredevil, about half of Luke Cage, all of Jessica Jones and two thirds of an episode of Iron Fist, but it makes sense(ish) to me. There's a bit of stuff that doesn't make sense, but nothing that takes away from the plot. It seems fairly self contained, and also there's a fair bit of exposition for the people who haven't watched any of the shows.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 6:30 pm
by mac_d
Basically have just sat on my fat pickle today watching Defenders. Pretty good. Not as good as Daredevil 1/2 or JJ. Not hard to follow the motivations and back stories for Luke Cage/Iron Fist so that was good. They do a good job of having a good evil villain plan without it being so big that you'd have to wonder why the Avengers, who exist in the universe, don't get called in which was good. If the villain plan was so over the top superhero style, that would have been an issue. Also tied in a few things from the other shows quite nicely.

One gripe I have:
Spoiler (click to show)

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:44 am
by Black_Flag_11
Is anyone else finding the pace in new GOT a bit too quick? It feels like they could do with some side storylines to break the show up a little more IMO, it's just jumping from Kings Landing to Winterfell to the Jon/Dany storylines.

I think they made a mistake going for 7 episodes, I'm all for quality over quantity but I feel that they could have padded this out to the usual 10 episodes with some filler which while not adding much to the story overall, could add some depth to the characters in their new situations. We didn't really need to see some of the torture stuff with Joffrey or Ramsay, the story would have made sense without it, but it added to the show because it made us dislike them that much more.

I'm being fussy but overall im still enjoying the show and staying up until ridiculous times to watch it when it plays for the first time, so it's obviously doing something right!
Spoiler (click to show)

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:11 am
by minchy
I thought that this season has been paced quickly too compared the last couple. I was wondering why they didn't make 2 10 episode seasons rather than a split 16 episode season. But watching season 1 again, that was paced really fast too.

I think it may just be because we are used to the pace for the past couple of seasons being fairly slow that it seems fast.
Spoiler (click to show)
Edit: Just on a side note to anyone who has read the books and not just watched the TV show like me. Does Ricon Stark actually have a purpose in the books as a character? He's not really needed at all in the TV show, him or shaggy dog.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 3:40 pm
by huggybear
minchy wrote:
Edit: Just on a side note to anyone who has read the books and not just watched the TV show like me. Does Ricon Stark actually have a purpose in the books as a character? He's not really needed at all in the TV show, him or shaggy dog.
Not really so far. But then in the books there is
Spoiler (click to show)
that is completely cut out of the show, so it's clear the show is winging it with regards to the plot.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 5:03 pm
by Black_Flag_11
huggybear wrote:
minchy wrote:
Edit: Just on a side note to anyone who has read the books and not just watched the TV show like me. Does Ricon Stark actually have a purpose in the books as a character? He's not really needed at all in the TV show, him or shaggy dog.
Not really so far. But then in the books there is
Spoiler (click to show)
that is completely cut out of the show, so it's clear the show is winging it with regards to the plot.
Spoiler (click to show)

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:10 pm
by huggybear
Black_Flag_11 wrote:
Spoiler (click to show)
Nah, it was
Spoiler (click to show)
.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:42 pm
by Black_Flag_11
huggybear wrote:
Black_Flag_11 wrote:
Spoiler (click to show)
Nah, it was
Spoiler (click to show)
.
Spoiler (click to show)

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 10:28 am
by Siao7
What, no discussion about the last GoT?

What do you people think?

It was brilliant. Exactly what I thought it should have ended this season. Making it so much more worth it to wait for the next one.
Spoiler (click to show)

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:09 pm
by mac_d
Lots of build up, very little real pay off.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 9:30 pm
by Black_Flag_11
mac_d wrote:Lots of build up, very little real pay off.
I felt the payoff was OK but really it was just set up for the next season, to be fair I think the last episode normally is, the penultimate one tends to be the episode the season has been building up to.
Spoiler (click to show)

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2017 12:54 pm
by Ennis
Black_Flag_11 wrote:
mac_d wrote:Lots of build up, very little real pay off.
I felt the payoff was OK but really it was just set up for the next season, to be fair I think the last episode normally is, the penultimate one tends to be the episode the season has been building up to.
Spoiler (click to show)
I get the feeling of no payoff.

I think the series has struggled a bit since they ran out of book material, although as I'm sure many people have mentioned - poor Game of Thrones is still far superior to anything else.

I think the poor pacing began in Season 6, where we had some truly bizarre ways of just throwing scenes at you. The Arya stabbing for one - just got stabbed, then on with the show. It all felt rushed.

I'm not one to jump on the fast travel bandwagon. I get the need for that, and I'm not going to split hairs around people suddenly showing up far away when we clearly have no idea how much time has passed anyway. But the big moments are lacking a little punch.

You used to have this fantastically paced show, all this build up, all this tension, all this emotional investment... and then it would stab you right in the gut. Now, there are some pretty significant and crazy things happening, but without the well-paced build up its all feeling a little bit more 'meh' than it should. My mind should have been more blown by what happened this season that it actually was.

Also someone above mentioned that they should have extended the 7 episodes to 10. I agree in theory, it could do with some more pacing - but I guess they've been left with no book material to write from, an increasingly expensive cast, contracts that they have to work within, and with more focus on the 'mythical' they've also got a much more expensive CGI bill to foot. HBO will only throw so much money at it, and the producers need to find a way to make that work as best they can. But as a viewer, f*ck the producers, find more money and give me my improved pacing!!

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 9:43 am
by minchy
It's only the mid season finale, so you would expect it to be a set up episode rather than a climax anyway.

I was a little disappointed with it until the final scene scene with the Lanister's which did give a good indication of both characterisation and intent of the people involved. I'm guessing they're going to continue the Jon Snow origins reveal in the second half of the season some how.

With the lack of book material to work from, does anyone know how much input Martin has had with the story? I know with the Harry Potter films, Rowling had a lot of input and helped the screen writers include little bits to tie in with future story lines of books which weren't even written yet.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 3:33 pm
by RachelM
Liar ITV1 - Great new short series to watch, six episodes but really gripping. One of them that leaves you guessing

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:07 pm
by moby
I just watched Guy Martin doing a stint with the Williams pit crew. Really good and worth watching. Its on catch up.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:23 pm
by minchy
Anyone else seen Star Trek Discovery yet? Any thoughts from anyone?

I'm of 2 minds really. I enjoyed it as show, but it almost didn't feel like star trek. I can't really put my finger on it as everything was great (other than the Klingon's all being bald). Hopefully they'll somehow go over how the Klingon's got to where they are in this show compared to where they were in Enterprise.

And I've just finished with Netflix's companion show 'After Trek' and my god that was a car crash! The presenter is annoying as hell, the people involved with the show they interviewed (with the possible exception of the supporting cast) all came across as not actually being Trekkies, just talking about it in the normal way US TV and Hollywood types talk about their work - with a load of publicity BS. It's also a bit annoying that they only hype their show and read out complementary tweets etc and don't actually have discussions between the crew and actual star trek fans about questions which I'd assume most trekkies want to ask about. But you can't really blame them for that, the show is there to promote their main show after all. Guess I'm gonna have to wade through 100's of YouTube videos to look at different views of the show, just a shame that all that is going to be opinionated and not discussions with the crew and cast.

Edit: As a side note, I loved the Lt Saur. Great character and well acted.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:30 pm
by SDLRob
I saw it described as being character focussed rather than plot focussed.... which was why it felt a little slow...

I really liked it. Thought it looked amazing, the visuals were stunning and the characters were really intriguing. Hated the Hologram tech though

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:38 pm
by mac_d
Netflix got the new Star Trek show. I quite like a bit of Star Trek. I don't much care for TOS, but like the TOS movies. I really liked TNG but don't rate the TNG movies. I liked Voyager, despite it's considerable flaws. DS9 was a brilliant show. Slow burn in it's first year but probably the best overall. Enterprise I didn't hate, and the last season actually started to get into being a good show. However, I'm not a huge fan of the JJ Abrams reboot universe which appears to be where this is set. This has some benefits. In the proper universe, you can't easily add in new and exciting aliens in a prequel. Plus we've seen most eras in that timeline. I guess this won't be a surprise to most people, but I didn't read any of the news on this show.

Collection of thoughts
1) It's nice to have some aliens that look a bit more alien.
2) The CGI, in the pilot at least, is pretty impressive.
3) I'm not a big fan of TV shows doing the thing where a foreign species or group will speak a foreign language and we have it subtitled. I know it's silly in WW2 movies when the Nazi's are speaking English but I honestly would rather have it in English. My hearing is a bit crap from years of loud gigs so I generally have subtitles on anyway so it's not that I have to read that bothers me.
4) Use of Sarek is cheap imo. Not everything has to always tie back to a "famous" character. Of course, it could well pay off.
5) I approve of the show opening with a 2 parter that is basically a TV movie.
6) Why is the main character called Michael?
7) The opening scene was stupid.

I'll keep watching, this wasn't at all enough to make up my mind either way.

Edit: The previous 2 posts popped up while I was writing this and watching the episodes. Coincidence? Probably, the show only aired last night.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:46 pm
by minchy
mac_d wrote:Netflix got the new Star Trek show. I quite like a bit of Star Trek. I don't much care for TOS, but like the TOS movies. I really liked TNG but don't rate the TNG movies. I liked Voyager, despite it's considerable flaws. DS9 was a brilliant show. Slow burn in it's first year but probably the best overall. Enterprise I didn't hate, and the last season actually started to get into being a good show. However, I'm not a huge fan of the JJ Abrams reboot universe which appears to be where this is set. This has some benefits. In the proper universe, you can't easily add in new and exciting aliens in a prequel. Plus we've seen most eras in that timeline. I guess this won't be a surprise to most people, but I didn't read any of the news on this show.

Collection of thoughts
1) It's nice to have some aliens that look a bit more alien.
2) The CGI, in the pilot at least, is pretty impressive.
3) I'm not a big fan of TV shows doing the thing where a foreign species or group will speak a foreign language and we have it subtitled. I know it's silly in WW2 movies when the Nazi's are speaking English but I honestly would rather have it in English. My hearing is a bit crap from years of loud gigs so I generally have subtitles on anyway so it's not that I have to read that bothers me.
4) Use of Sarek is cheap imo. Not everything has to always tie back to a "famous" character. Of course, it could well pay off.
5) I approve of the show opening with a 2 parter that is basically a TV movie.
6) Why is the main character called Michael?
7) The opening scene was stupid.

I'll keep watching, this wasn't at all enough to make up my mind either way.

Edit: The previous 2 posts popped up while I was writing this and watching the episodes. Coincidence? Probably, the show only aired last night.
1 little point, it is supposed to be set in the 'normal' star trek universe, not the the JJ Abrams alternative one. Although now you mention that, the basic story of the double episode has some surprising similarities to the first Star Trek reboot film!

And lol at your edit :)

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:50 pm
by SDLRob
I suspect they're going with a combination of ToS & JJ....

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:55 pm
by minchy
The main difference between the original star trek's and JJ's star trek 90210 is really just visuals, budget and a teeny tiny emphasis on the fiction over the science (York Town anyone?)!!! And with modern TV as it is, studios are more than willing to lay down some serious bucks for a good TV show so I'm really expecting this to look amazing.

(York Town was an amazing idea, but a bit far fetched is all I'm saying ;) )

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2017 2:27 pm
by Alienturnedhuman
Ah, Star Trek Discovery. Better than I expected, but I set my expectations low after the reboot-not-a-reboot JJ-movies.

However, disregarding any arguments regarding visual continuity of starship design and the Klingon aesthetic - which is a huge can of worms certainly not relevant for a non Star Trek series, I think the excellent Twitter parody account summed up some of the bigger issues with the show with a couple of its tweets:

The problem was the show had a premise it needed to set up, and they dictated the character's actions based on that.

We needed to have a war with the Klingons.
We needed to have that war blamed on Michael.
We needed to have Michael lose her captain to the Klingons.

None of the actions actually made any sense.

The 24 Klingon houses turned up and said "why should we listen to you?"

Then blah blah blah, 2 minutes of talking and "ok, we're now listening to you"

Michael openly defies and argues her captain on the bridge, she is then ordered into the ready room - clearly to be given a bollocking, nerve pinches the captain, comes out - relieves Saro and claims the captain is now totally on board with her plan and no one questions it (except Saro)

Then, after escaping her prison cell, making it to the bridge she says:

* We mustn't destroy their ship
* We mustn't kill the main Klingon guy or he'll become a martyr

And then offers to go on the suicide mission to plant the bombs to destroy the ship.

And then goes on a suicide mission of which the only outcome is for her captain to die and then she shoots the klingon guy dead.

The second episode of the show was basically characters saying "we won't or shouldn't do this" and then doing it.

Buuuuuutttt...

This 2 hours was just meant to be character development. To set up the Klingon war, to provide Michael with a personal antagonist (the albino Klingon guy) and to have her an outcast and considered to be the catalyst that caused the war.

The show is called "Star Trek Discovery" and we haven't even seen the Discovery yet, let alone found out what the main direction of the show is. These two episodes were just to establish Michael, and episode 3 will be the start of the series as a whole.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 6:39 pm
by minchy
We'll, I've watched episode 3 now, and whilst it may end up being an ok sci-fi show, it's not looking like it's going to be a good Star Trek show!

I still can't put my finger on it, but it just feels like it has been taken over by lefty Hollywood types and has their agenda is being thrust in our faces! I'm not per say against their views, but a TV show that no bearing on the modern world, really isn't the place to do this. It may be just me who sees it like this, but this alone annoyed me.

And as got characters in the show - I'm not a fan of the Michael character and really think they've the wrong actress to play her. Don't really like any of the main characters so far except Saru (and he started getting a bot annoying in the latest episode), and I'm not sure I like where the story is going either.

Anyway, cheered myself up by watching back to back the first 8 episodes of TNG season one and felt better after :)

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 2:02 pm
by thingy003
I tried Discovery but found the first episode to be a bit flat. Having said that though I have it on good authority that it comes into its own by episode 3 so I will go back to it.

The Orville seems to be more Trek than Trek so I will be continuing with that and would recommend it to all.

However the best scifi out there and in fact the best show I have watched in a long time (possibly eclipsing even GoT) if The Expanse. There are 2 season to watch on Netflix and the 3rd is just being finished. I don't want to give any plot away but this show is just amazing. The first season is a bit of a struggle at times as you need to have been paying attention to everything but it becomes much slicker by Season 2 and now I am going cold turkey waiting for Season 3. Fortunately I have the books to read.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2017 5:16 pm
by mac_d
thingy003 wrote:I tried Discovery but found the first episode to be a bit flat. Having said that though I have it on good authority that it comes into its own by episode 3 so I will go back to it.

The Orville seems to be more Trek than Trek so I will be continuing with that and would recommend it to all.

However the best scifi out there and in fact the best show I have watched in a long time (possibly eclipsing even GoT) if The Expanse. There are 2 season to watch on Netflix and the 3rd is just being finished. I don't want to give any plot away but this show is just amazing. The first season is a bit of a struggle at times as you need to have been paying attention to everything but it becomes much slicker by Season 2 and now I am going cold turkey waiting for Season 3. Fortunately I have the books to read.
I keep meaning to watch the Expanse. I also want to sit and watch Falling Skies which someone on here recommended to me ages ago - I think when it had only 1 season.

I'm split on Disco still. I need to see Episode 4 first and these things take a while to find their feet, but I'm not feeling the current way I think the plot is going with the travel tech but I think the war backdrop could be interesting. DS9 did Star Trek at war really well. Saru seems to have split people. He didn't bother me yet, and I think he's a cool looking character. For a guy with some rubber stuck to him, he looks pretty non-human. And Lucius Malfoy I think will fit the role they have for him as I see it.

And chances are that I'll finish the last season of How I Met Your Mother tonight and start again at episode 1 rather than watching any of these. I swear I basically pay Netflix for that show alone.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2017 3:04 pm
by thingy003
so I have persevered a bit with Star Trek Discovery and it is growing on me. I think that the first 2 episodes were a bit pointless and the basic story could have been imparted more effectively through flashback (although not to the extend that they used flashbacks in Arrow)

I am also watching season 2 of Lethal Weapon which I prefer to the films now and Season 2 of Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency. I love the Dirk Gently show but this really is not going to be for many, if at all any, of you.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2017 9:29 pm
by Mayhem
@ thingy003;

Lethal weapon has been a pretty good show thus far. The 2 leading characters portray the roles quite well.....

You might wanna check out the series "seal team" as well. It doesn't have the comic relief of lethal weapon but the action and attention to detail regarding the missions is executed very well....

Anyone watching gotham? The flash? Or arrow?

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:16 pm
by Siao7
Anyone watching Stranger Things?

I love it. Music alone is just awesome.


Arrow has lost it's charm to me. Flash is still ok so far.

Lethal Weapon is weird, not hating it but not loving it either. I think I am too attached to Glover and Gibson.

I started the new McGyver and it is impossible to watch at times. If you thought that the old one was far fetched, some stuff of this new one are just way too much.

I also watched Zoo recently. It started greatly, but then veered off fast. Can't say that I will keep watching in the future.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 1:32 pm
by minchy
I'm in the middle of stranger things season 2 now. Really awesome! Didn't think they could compete with the first season, but it's just as good. Really can't say enough good things about this show - the story, the characters, the writing, the actors, the directing, the cinematography.... Everything! It's close to a perfect show imo! Absolutely loving it.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:23 pm
by Siao7
minchy wrote:I'm in the middle of stranger things season 2 now. Really awesome! Didn't think they could compete with the first season, but it's just as good. Really can't say enough good things about this show - the story, the characters, the writing, the actors, the directing, the cinematography.... Everything! It's close to a perfect show imo! Absolutely loving it.
Not loving it as much as the first season, but still ok. Read the spoiler when you finish it!
Spoiler (click to show)

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:41 pm
by minchy
Siao7 wrote:
minchy wrote:I'm in the middle of stranger things season 2 now. Really awesome! Didn't think they could compete with the first season, but it's just as good. Really can't say enough good things about this show - the story, the characters, the writing, the actors, the directing, the cinematography.... Everything! It's close to a perfect show imo! Absolutely loving it.
Not loving it as much as the first season, but still ok. Read the spoiler when you finish it!
Spoiler (click to show)
Spoiler (click to show)

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 4:24 pm
by mac_d
Loved Marvel/Netflix' The Punisher TV show. Nailed it in my opinion. The standard of these Marvel/Netflix shows has been pretty good. Daredevil S2 and JJ S1 were the two season's I thought were absolute brilliant, with DD S1 being great then Defenders being good but left the true team up stuff a bit late imo and I didn't much care for Luke Cage or Iron Fist. I'd put Punisher near the top of the list. JJ was different to Punisher and DD in that I'm not sure how good it would have been without David Tennant just being amazing in it - I'm less confident in JJ S2 being all that grand compared to DD S3 which I have much more confidence in.
Anyway, I thought this had good pacing, had a good overall narrative, paid off well and was generally very entertaining and enjoyable to watch. Slightly more brutal and gorey than the other shows, but not by much. To sum up, if you liked Punisher in Daredevil S2, I think you'll enjoy this for sure. Haven't read any Punisher beyond maybe 1 or 2 stories so don't know how a diehard fan would see it, but I really enjoyed it.

Spoiler for some spoiler-y thoughts/nitpicky nonsense regarding the whole season and for DD too.
Spoiler (click to show)

I seem to have somewhat given up on Star Trek: Disco for now anyway. I'd quite like to see it, if for no other reason than it is Star Trek... though I'm not at all sure I've seen all the TOS episodes actually. I'll probably binge my way through it once the whole season is up and see how I like it then. I'm really not a fan of watching one episode per week like the traditional TV routine would be anymore.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2017 12:39 am
by Alienturnedhuman
mac_d wrote:I seem to have somewhat given up on Star Trek: Disco for now anyway. I'd quite like to see it, if for no other reason than it is Star Trek... though I'm not at all sure I've seen all the TOS episodes actually. I'll probably binge my way through it once the whole season is up and see how I like it then. I'm really not a fan of watching one episode per week like the traditional TV routine would be anymore.
The final episode of Discovery (well the mid season finale) was by far and away the best episode of the season and it was also the most Star Trek like.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:33 pm
by Mayhem
mac_d wrote:Loved Marvel/Netflix' The Punisher TV show. Nailed it in my opinion. The standard of these Marvel/Netflix shows has been pretty good. Daredevil S2 and JJ S1 were the two season's I thought were absolute brilliant, with DD S1 being great then Defenders being good but left the true team up stuff a bit late imo and I didn't much care for Luke Cage or Iron Fist. I'd put Punisher near the top of the list. JJ was different to Punisher and DD in that I'm not sure how good it would have been without David Tennant just being amazing in it - I'm less confident in JJ S2 being all that grand compared to DD S3 which I have much more confidence in.
Anyway, I thought this had good pacing, had a good overall narrative, paid off well and was generally very entertaining and enjoyable to watch. Slightly more brutal and gorey than the other shows, but not by much. To sum up, if you liked Punisher in Daredevil S2, I think you'll enjoy this for sure. Haven't read any Punisher beyond maybe 1 or 2 stories so don't know how a diehard fan would see it, but I really enjoyed it.

Spoiler for some spoiler-y thoughts/nitpicky nonsense regarding the whole season and for DD too.
Spoiler (click to show)
Jon bernthal absolutely nailed the Punisher role. The whole series was very well executed, glad that marvel took there time with this one and it paid off. The show has the right amount of gore to it with a hint of psychotic mayhem played by multiple characters.
Spoiler (click to show)

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:51 pm
by CC78AMG
Stranger Things in my opinion is the best thing on Netflix and thats saying something. I just love everything the characters, the storyline, the mood of the 80's.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2018 10:24 pm
by Mayhem
Anyone watch the tv show street outlaws???

For those who aren't familiar with the show it is a tv show about a street racing team in Oklahoma. They are the self proclaimed "fastest street racers in the country." They street race back halved american muscle cars in a 1/8th mile street race. They have a top 10 list of who's the fastest and they compete against eachother to climb up the ranks of their list... They also travel to other states and compete in out of town races.... Some pretty cool cars twin turbo & heavy nitrous setups.

https://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/street-outlaws/


Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2018 6:56 pm
by mac_d
Altered Carbon on Netflix. :thumbup:

Very much enjoyed this show. No real hassle following it and putting a few of the pieces together that they didn't have time to explain. Excellent cast. Likeable characters where they intended them to be likeable. Clearly had a solid budget behind it and at no point did I feel like they had to scrimp. A lot of sci-fi concepts I really like, though it made me wonder about another show I love that seems to have ripped a lot of it's cool ideas off from this (rather, the source novel). Overall, well built and didn't have that padded out feel that some Netflix shows have. This is 10 episodes rather than 13 but I'd rather get the 10 good, tight episodes rather than 13 that are a slog. Very much enjoyed this.

One spoiler for the show:
Spoiler (click to show)

And then Netflix suggested The Expanse, which had been on my list for ages so I went for it. Currently finished S1 and a couple of S2 episodes.

Also gets a :thumbup: . Actually, I really like this show because it's - so far - pretty realistic and sticks to the rules pretty steadfastly. None of your Star Trek style technobabble shot a magic beam out of the deflector array stuff here (not having a go, I like ST). I find that kind of thing very appealing. I will say this, I don't think they handled the introduction of characters, themes and the status quo of that universe very well in the first episode. I feel like I struggled to keep up with who everyone was, where they were, what their goals were, who they were allied with etc. After the second or third episode, that was no longer an issue. Of course, that could be a me thing rather than a writing issue. And, even with that said I can see why they did it in such a way. This is much less flashy than Altered Carbon, but I've been very much enjoying this too. It's not


I'll probably finish up watch the Expanse by tomorrow evening as I have nothing much on this weekend. Not sure what I'll watch afterwards. Enjoying my current sci-fi binge but don't fancy much else on Netflix's sci-fi list.

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:14 am
by Siao7
Yeah, Altered Carbon was good. Can't see a S2, it kind of had it's closure

Re: The TV Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:46 am
by minchy
I've heard a few people saying that the world they created in altered carbon was good, but that's where the positives stopped! A couple of people I know who've seen it said that the script writing and acting were awful. But I usually have similar taste in TV to mac_d, so I'll give it go based to the 2 recommendations above and see how it goes.