Re: The Official Fernando Alonso thread
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 10:14 pm
I´m probably as far from a Alonso supporter as you´ll find on this forum but I wouldn´t call that piece a love letter.
That doesn't access the article you posted, reading the reddit link backs up what I said about Alonso never driving the McLaren on the Michelin tyres.Lotus49 wrote:And I explained my interpretation.pokerman wrote:I was just questioning your interpretation of Hamilton not being on the pace from day 1 in respect to the article.Lotus49 wrote:They were referencing his confidence of beating the rookie and his concern for the WCC, I assume both of those things stemmed from Lewis writing off that tub trying to keep up in testing, so to mention the self confidence and concern for WCC but not mention where it might have stemmed from was a little iffy.pokerman wrote:Just one point I would take up with you, what has testing on Michelins got to do what was said in the article, on the pace from day 1 clearly is referencing from race 1.Lotus49 wrote: I think that's pretty unfair on the article, it leaves plenty out of 2007 from both sides as its not just a 2007 piece. It says Lewis was on pace immediately, he wasn't. He was half a second slower on Michelins in testing. It doesn't mention Alonso not being allowed to run Hitco brakes until the summer or the whole racing Alonso thing, tyre blanket suspicion and independent steward request. All things that would be included in any puff piece and they'd certainly not "reveal" the full extent of the running out of fuel story a few days before has to sit and likely answer questions about it on his last weekend.
I do think Crashgate should've been mentioned though,but then they should've noted him being cleared as well but he's left out the second Renault stint entirely.
But the piece criticises his decision making, the people he kept around him, his attitude and ultimately how he couldn't achieve what he should've. That's not a puff piece, its just not an all out bash piece either like I said. It will make Alonso fans uncomfortable reading it in places but also apparently those wanting more shots at him too so it does about as good a job as you can do I think.
Not a big deal though and obviously in Australia he was clearly on pace right away.
When referencing Hamilton being half a second off the pace on Michelins was that not in respect to Kimi, did Alonso ever test the McLaren on Michelins?
Hamilton did crash the McLaren on a wet/damp track, you seem to have entwined this in with Hamilton trying to make up the half a second deficit to Alonso and trying to hard?
It's not my entwining, it was a Mark Hughes comment on the recent team mate comparison article. From the comments section and in reply to a question about what would've happened if they'd remained with Michelin...
https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/opin ... on-f1-2017Mark Hughes wrote:I'm pretty sure it would've taken Hamilton a few races to reach Alonso's level if they were still on Michelins (which Alonso had raced for years while the Bridgestones they did race on were new to Alonso but quite similar to what Hamilton was used to in GP2). The early testing was done on Michelins and Alonso was consistently 0.5-6s faster, with Hamilton actually writing a tub off trying to get within half a second. So yes,I think it would've been different but Hamilton would've got there eventually.
Nice videoowenmahamilton wrote:Just seen this video, nice to see the deckchair got more use, lol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CohuAMqJFNc
The link seems to work for me? (The quote is in the comments section below)pokerman wrote:That doesn't access the article you posted, reading the reddit link backs up what I said about Alonso never driving the McLaren on the Michelin tyres.Lotus49 wrote:And I explained my interpretation.pokerman wrote:I was just questioning your interpretation of Hamilton not being on the pace from day 1 in respect to the article.Lotus49 wrote:They were referencing his confidence of beating the rookie and his concern for the WCC, I assume both of those things stemmed from Lewis writing off that tub trying to keep up in testing, so to mention the self confidence and concern for WCC but not mention where it might have stemmed from was a little iffy.pokerman wrote: Just one point I would take up with you, what has testing on Michelins got to do what was said in the article, on the pace from day 1 clearly is referencing from race 1.
Not a big deal though and obviously in Australia he was clearly on pace right away.
When referencing Hamilton being half a second off the pace on Michelins was that not in respect to Kimi, did Alonso ever test the McLaren on Michelins?
Hamilton did crash the McLaren on a wet/damp track, you seem to have entwined this in with Hamilton trying to make up the half a second deficit to Alonso and trying to hard?
It's not my entwining, it was a Mark Hughes comment on the recent team mate comparison article. From the comments section and in reply to a question about what would've happened if they'd remained with Michelin...
https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/opin ... on-f1-2017Mark Hughes wrote:I'm pretty sure it would've taken Hamilton a few races to reach Alonso's level if they were still on Michelins (which Alonso had raced for years while the Bridgestones they did race on were new to Alonso but quite similar to what Hamilton was used to in GP2). The early testing was done on Michelins and Alonso was consistently 0.5-6s faster, with Hamilton actually writing a tub off trying to get within half a second. So yes,I think it would've been different but Hamilton would've got there eventually.
Oh I just read the article.Lotus49 wrote:The link seems to work for me? (The quote is in the comments section below)pokerman wrote:That doesn't access the article you posted, reading the reddit link backs up what I said about Alonso never driving the McLaren on the Michelin tyres.Lotus49 wrote:And I explained my interpretation.pokerman wrote:I was just questioning your interpretation of Hamilton not being on the pace from day 1 in respect to the article.Lotus49 wrote: They were referencing his confidence of beating the rookie and his concern for the WCC, I assume both of those things stemmed from Lewis writing off that tub trying to keep up in testing, so to mention the self confidence and concern for WCC but not mention where it might have stemmed from was a little iffy.
Not a big deal though and obviously in Australia he was clearly on pace right away.
When referencing Hamilton being half a second off the pace on Michelins was that not in respect to Kimi, did Alonso ever test the McLaren on Michelins?
Hamilton did crash the McLaren on a wet/damp track, you seem to have entwined this in with Hamilton trying to make up the half a second deficit to Alonso and trying to hard?
It's not my entwining, it was a Mark Hughes comment on the recent team mate comparison article. From the comments section and in reply to a question about what would've happened if they'd remained with Michelin...
https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/opin ... on-f1-2017Mark Hughes wrote:I'm pretty sure it would've taken Hamilton a few races to reach Alonso's level if they were still on Michelins (which Alonso had raced for years while the Bridgestones they did race on were new to Alonso but quite similar to what Hamilton was used to in GP2). The early testing was done on Michelins and Alonso was consistently 0.5-6s faster, with Hamilton actually writing a tub off trying to get within half a second. So yes,I think it would've been different but Hamilton would've got there eventually.
I genuinely have no idea who's made a mistake or if any mistake has been made, I can't answer for him.pokerman wrote:Oh I just read the article.Lotus49 wrote:The link seems to work for me? (The quote is in the comments section below)pokerman wrote:That doesn't access the article you posted, reading the reddit link backs up what I said about Alonso never driving the McLaren on the Michelin tyres.Lotus49 wrote:And I explained my interpretation.pokerman wrote: I was just questioning your interpretation of Hamilton not being on the pace from day 1 in respect to the article.
When referencing Hamilton being half a second off the pace on Michelins was that not in respect to Kimi, did Alonso ever test the McLaren on Michelins?
Hamilton did crash the McLaren on a wet/damp track, you seem to have entwined this in with Hamilton trying to make up the half a second deficit to Alonso and trying to hard?
It's not my entwining, it was a Mark Hughes comment on the recent team mate comparison article. From the comments section and in reply to a question about what would've happened if they'd remained with Michelin...
https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/opin ... on-f1-2017Mark Hughes wrote:I'm pretty sure it would've taken Hamilton a few races to reach Alonso's level if they were still on Michelins (which Alonso had raced for years while the Bridgestones they did race on were new to Alonso but quite similar to what Hamilton was used to in GP2). The early testing was done on Michelins and Alonso was consistently 0.5-6s faster, with Hamilton actually writing a tub off trying to get within half a second. So yes,I think it would've been different but Hamilton would've got there eventually.
Edit: Read it now, did Hughes make a mistake with the Michelins?
Interesting that Hughes considered that both Alonso and Hamilton operated at a much higher level than Kimi in 2007.
Well somebody posted a link to the testing schedule that never had Alonso running on Michelins?Lotus49 wrote:I genuinely have no idea who's made a mistake or if any mistake has been made, I can't answer for him.pokerman wrote:Oh I just read the article.Lotus49 wrote:The link seems to work for me? (The quote is in the comments section below)pokerman wrote: That doesn't access the article you posted, reading the reddit link backs up what I said about Alonso never driving the McLaren on the Michelin tyres.
Edit: Read it now, did Hughes make a mistake with the Michelins?
Interesting that Hughes considered that both Alonso and Hamilton operated at a much higher level than Kimi in 2007.
I'd certainly say Lewis did and I'd probably agree on Alonso although he had some moments and Kimi's run in is a bit under rated because of all that went on in McLaren and Massa seemingly giving him the win in Brazil. Tbh its a long time ago but I'm not sure about 'much higher'. Considering Lewis was a rookie I could see that tag for him though I think.
Yes a testing schedule with no links to confirm anything and like I said I can't answer if Hughes has made a mistake or the anonymous poster on reddit has.pokerman wrote:Well somebody posted a link to the testing schedule that never had Alonso running on Michelins?Lotus49 wrote:I genuinely have no idea who's made a mistake or if any mistake has been made, I can't answer for him.pokerman wrote:Oh I just read the article.Lotus49 wrote:
The link seems to work for me? (The quote is in the comments section below)
Edit: Read it now, did Hughes make a mistake with the Michelins?
Interesting that Hughes considered that both Alonso and Hamilton operated at a much higher level than Kimi in 2007.
I'd certainly say Lewis did and I'd probably agree on Alonso although he had some moments and Kimi's run in is a bit under rated because of all that went on in McLaren and Massa seemingly giving him the win in Brazil. Tbh its a long time ago but I'm not sure about 'much higher'. Considering Lewis was a rookie I could see that tag for him though I think.
You mean Hamilton made a mistake in Hungary?
It's interesting reading Hughes' take on things although it's a bit disjointed in knowing the timeline, he seems to suggest that running Hamilton out of fuel was actually first brought up by Alonso before Hungary, Hamilton had been made aware about this and perhaps became paranoid hence his actions in Hungary perhaps?
I find this interesting because I've already said similar myself in respect to Hamilton being paranoid and Alonso plotting in the background although I'd never heard about the running out of fuel thing.
It's not what you said but what Hughes said in the comments section.Lotus49 wrote:Yes a testing schedule with no links to confirm anything and like I said I can't answer if Hughes has made a mistake or the anonymous poster on reddit has.pokerman wrote:Well somebody posted a link to the testing schedule that never had Alonso running on Michelins?Lotus49 wrote:I genuinely have no idea who's made a mistake or if any mistake has been made, I can't answer for him.pokerman wrote:Oh I just read the article.Lotus49 wrote:
The link seems to work for me? (The quote is in the comments section below)
Edit: Read it now, did Hughes make a mistake with the Michelins?
Interesting that Hughes considered that both Alonso and Hamilton operated at a much higher level than Kimi in 2007.
I'd certainly say Lewis did and I'd probably agree on Alonso although he had some moments and Kimi's run in is a bit under rated because of all that went on in McLaren and Massa seemingly giving him the win in Brazil. Tbh its a long time ago but I'm not sure about 'much higher'. Considering Lewis was a rookie I could see that tag for him though I think.
You mean Hamilton made a mistake in Hungary?
It's interesting reading Hughes' take on things although it's a bit disjointed in knowing the timeline, he seems to suggest that running Hamilton out of fuel was actually first brought up by Alonso before Hungary, Hamilton had been made aware about this and perhaps became paranoid hence his actions in Hungary perhaps?
I find this interesting because I've already said similar myself in respect to Hamilton being paranoid and Alonso plotting in the background although I'd never heard about the running out of fuel thing.
No idea what on earth you think you read to get this random response about Lewis in Hungary? At least give me a clue as to what you think I said this time?
Can I get a hint as to what he said then?pokerman wrote:It's not what you said but what Hughes said in the comments section.Lotus49 wrote:Yes a testing schedule with no links to confirm anything and like I said I can't answer if Hughes has made a mistake or the anonymous poster on reddit has.pokerman wrote:Well somebody posted a link to the testing schedule that never had Alonso running on Michelins?Lotus49 wrote:I genuinely have no idea who's made a mistake or if any mistake has been made, I can't answer for him.pokerman wrote: Oh I just read the article.
Edit: Read it now, did Hughes make a mistake with the Michelins?
Interesting that Hughes considered that both Alonso and Hamilton operated at a much higher level than Kimi in 2007.
I'd certainly say Lewis did and I'd probably agree on Alonso although he had some moments and Kimi's run in is a bit under rated because of all that went on in McLaren and Massa seemingly giving him the win in Brazil. Tbh its a long time ago but I'm not sure about 'much higher'. Considering Lewis was a rookie I could see that tag for him though I think.
You mean Hamilton made a mistake in Hungary?
It's interesting reading Hughes' take on things although it's a bit disjointed in knowing the timeline, he seems to suggest that running Hamilton out of fuel was actually first brought up by Alonso before Hungary, Hamilton had been made aware about this and perhaps became paranoid hence his actions in Hungary perhaps?
I find this interesting because I've already said similar myself in respect to Hamilton being paranoid and Alonso plotting in the background although I'd never heard about the running out of fuel thing.
No idea what on earth you think you read to get this random response about Lewis in Hungary? At least give me a clue as to what you think I said this time?
The race is about to start, I did take the trouble myself to read the complete article you posted, even so I will post it later.Lotus49 wrote:Can I get a hint as to what he said then?pokerman wrote:It's not what you said but what Hughes said in the comments section.Lotus49 wrote:Yes a testing schedule with no links to confirm anything and like I said I can't answer if Hughes has made a mistake or the anonymous poster on reddit has.pokerman wrote:Well somebody posted a link to the testing schedule that never had Alonso running on Michelins?Lotus49 wrote: I genuinely have no idea who's made a mistake or if any mistake has been made, I can't answer for him.
I'd certainly say Lewis did and I'd probably agree on Alonso although he had some moments and Kimi's run in is a bit under rated because of all that went on in McLaren and Massa seemingly giving him the win in Brazil. Tbh its a long time ago but I'm not sure about 'much higher'. Considering Lewis was a rookie I could see that tag for him though I think.
You mean Hamilton made a mistake in Hungary?
It's interesting reading Hughes' take on things although it's a bit disjointed in knowing the timeline, he seems to suggest that running Hamilton out of fuel was actually first brought up by Alonso before Hungary, Hamilton had been made aware about this and perhaps became paranoid hence his actions in Hungary perhaps?
I find this interesting because I've already said similar myself in respect to Hamilton being paranoid and Alonso plotting in the background although I'd never heard about the running out of fuel thing.
No idea what on earth you think you read to get this random response about Lewis in Hungary? At least give me a clue as to what you think I said this time?
I think you might have got the wrong end of the stick on something, You've completely lost me now.pokerman wrote:The race is about to start, I did take the trouble myself to read the complete article you posted, even so I will post it later.Lotus49 wrote:Can I get a hint as to what he said then?pokerman wrote:It's not what you said but what Hughes said in the comments section.Lotus49 wrote:Yes a testing schedule with no links to confirm anything and like I said I can't answer if Hughes has made a mistake or the anonymous poster on reddit has.pokerman wrote: Well somebody posted a link to the testing schedule that never had Alonso running on Michelins?
You mean Hamilton made a mistake in Hungary?
It's interesting reading Hughes' take on things although it's a bit disjointed in knowing the timeline, he seems to suggest that running Hamilton out of fuel was actually first brought up by Alonso before Hungary, Hamilton had been made aware about this and perhaps became paranoid hence his actions in Hungary perhaps?
I find this interesting because I've already said similar myself in respect to Hamilton being paranoid and Alonso plotting in the background although I'd never heard about the running out of fuel thing.
No idea what on earth you think you read to get this random response about Lewis in Hungary? At least give me a clue as to what you think I said this time?
Button showed up in 2000 just one year earlier. I'd include him in that group.BMWSauber84 wrote:Alonso departs. Himself, Raikkonen and Montoya were three who debuted at the 2001 Australian Grand prix and all were considered potential heirs to Schumacher before too long. With Kimi dropping out of the frontline battle it really does feel like the end of an era.
Nice send off from Hamilton and Vettel.sandman1347 wrote:This was cool to watch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBAqtx1K1uQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddbproPstDc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4oFQkex9Dg&t=1spokerman wrote:Nice send off from Hamilton and Vettel.sandman1347 wrote:This was cool to watch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBAqtx1K1uQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddbproPstDc
Seeing Hamilton, Alonso, Vettel plus Verstappen all together on the start/finish straight being interviewed, that's got to be something for posterity?sandman1347 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4oFQkex9Dg&t=1spokerman wrote:Nice send off from Hamilton and Vettel.sandman1347 wrote:This was cool to watch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBAqtx1K1uQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddbproPstDc
Yeah this is the official video. Goosebumps! Three legends doing donuts in F1 cars!
Up there with 'that' photo of Prost, Senna, Mansell and Piquet.pokerman wrote:Seeing Hamilton, Alonso, Vettel plus Verstappen all together on the start/finish straight being interviewed, that's got to be something for posterity?sandman1347 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4oFQkex9Dg&t=1spokerman wrote:Nice send off from Hamilton and Vettel.sandman1347 wrote:This was cool to watch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBAqtx1K1uQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddbproPstDc
Yeah this is the official video. Goosebumps! Three legends doing donuts in F1 cars!
Yeah very much a similar thing.Flash2k11 wrote:Up there with 'that' photo of Prost, Senna, Mansell and Piquet.pokerman wrote:Seeing Hamilton, Alonso, Vettel plus Verstappen all together on the start/finish straight being interviewed, that's got to be something for posterity?sandman1347 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4oFQkex9Dg&t=1spokerman wrote:Nice send off from Hamilton and Vettel.sandman1347 wrote:This was cool to watch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBAqtx1K1uQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddbproPstDc
Yeah this is the official video. Goosebumps! Three legends doing donuts in F1 cars!
sandman1347 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4oFQkex9Dg&t=1spokerman wrote:Nice send off from Hamilton and Vettel.sandman1347 wrote:This was cool to watch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBAqtx1K1uQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddbproPstDc
Yeah this is the official video. Goosebumps! Three legends doing donuts in F1 cars!
Idea for a new consturctors championship.. synchronized donuts!pc27b wrote:sandman1347 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4oFQkex9Dg&t=1spokerman wrote:Nice send off from Hamilton and Vettel.sandman1347 wrote:This was cool to watch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBAqtx1K1uQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddbproPstDc
Yeah this is the official video. Goosebumps! Three legends doing donuts in F1 cars!
i texted my brother when that was happening, pretty cool. vettel and alonso looked synchronized
Oppertunities he has himself closed the avenues too. I have some sympathy because he clearly is still right on top of his game and should still be considered one of the standout drivers, but his behaviour down the years was only ever going to put the corporate types off of him, and that's another skill a driver has to have these days.Blinky McSquinty wrote:As I watched Alonso get into his car my heart was filled with sadness because the man is still one of the very best, and because he could not find a good ride, decided to go elsewhere.
It is a damning condemnation on Formula One when a top driver is stalled because of the lack of parity and opportunities.
Or a reflection of the quality and depth in the current driver field with younger drivers providing strong options, as well as the closing of the front teams meaning that teams contemplating championships are much more likely to operate with a star driver and solid no. 2 combo. Competition has been disappointingly weak between 2014-16, and even since then with only Ferrari getting close, but there are signs that things are moving in the right direction.Blinky McSquinty wrote:As I watched Alonso get into his car my heart was filled with sadness because the man is still one of the very best, and because he could not find a good ride, decided to go elsewhere.
It is a damning condemnation on Formula One when a top driver is stalled because of the lack of parity and opportunities.
Indeed and has to be said not his preferred choice.owenmahamilton wrote:This comes as no surprise:
https://www.autosport.com/indycar/news/ ... -chevrolet
No, but you have to remember that the engine differences in Indy are not as big as in F1. The Honda has typically had a bit of an edge in recent years, but we're only talking 20-30 bhp at the absolute most. He'll still be able to win with the Chevy engine if everything goes well.pokerman wrote:Indeed and has to be said not his preferred choice.owenmahamilton wrote:This comes as no surprise:
https://www.autosport.com/indycar/news/ ... -chevrolet
Says who? It was McLaren's preferred choice to run Chevy and his own preferred choice was to run with McLaren as Pruett said he had other offers so not sure what he expected if his preferred choice wasn't Chevy.pokerman wrote:Indeed and has to be said not his preferred choice.owenmahamilton wrote:This comes as no surprise:
https://www.autosport.com/indycar/news/ ... -chevrolet
Ok then it was Alonso's preferred choice to run with McLaren but Honda wouldn't supply McLaren with engines which was their preferred choice.Lotus49 wrote:Says who? It was McLaren's preferred choice to run Chevy and his own preferred choice was to run with McLaren as Pruett said he had other offers so not sure what he expected if his preferred choice wasn't Chevy.pokerman wrote:Indeed and has to be said not his preferred choice.owenmahamilton wrote:This comes as no surprise:
https://www.autosport.com/indycar/news/ ... -chevrolet
Yeah there is probably not much difference but wasn't it more of a case of wanting to run under the Andretti stable again running exactly the same equipment?Exediron wrote:No, but you have to remember that the engine differences in Indy are not as big as in F1. The Honda has typically had a bit of an edge in recent years, but we're only talking 20-30 bhp at the absolute most. He'll still be able to win with the Chevy engine if everything goes well.pokerman wrote:Indeed and has to be said not his preferred choice.owenmahamilton wrote:This comes as no surprise:
https://www.autosport.com/indycar/news/ ... -chevrolet
Who said Honda were McLaren's preferred choice? Both Pruett and this article state Chevy were McLaren's preferred choice.pokerman wrote:Ok then it was Alonso's preferred choice to run with McLaren but Honda wouldn't supply McLaren with engines which was their preferred choice.Lotus49 wrote:Says who? It was McLaren's preferred choice to run Chevy and his own preferred choice was to run with McLaren as Pruett said he had other offers so not sure what he expected if his preferred choice wasn't Chevy.pokerman wrote:Indeed and has to be said not his preferred choice.owenmahamilton wrote:This comes as no surprise:
https://www.autosport.com/indycar/news/ ... -chevrolet
I would say that goes against everything that was said before, if Chevy is the preferred chose then why did they bother with Honda in the first place or did Honda actually not say we won't supply you?Lotus49 wrote:Who said Honda were McLaren's preferred choice? Both Pruett and this article state Chevy were McLaren's preferred choice.pokerman wrote:Ok then it was Alonso's preferred choice to run with McLaren but Honda wouldn't supply McLaren with engines which was their preferred choice.Lotus49 wrote:Says who? It was McLaren's preferred choice to run Chevy and his own preferred choice was to run with McLaren as Pruett said he had other offers so not sure what he expected if his preferred choice wasn't Chevy.pokerman wrote:Indeed and has to be said not his preferred choice.owenmahamilton wrote:This comes as no surprise:
https://www.autosport.com/indycar/news/ ... -chevrolet