Toro Rosso to switch to Renault engines

Forum rules
Please read the forum rules
Post Reply
Danny_Boy99
Posts: 122
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:59 pm
Location: Milton Keynes

Toro Rosso to switch to Renault engines

Post by Danny_Boy99 »

So it seems STR have come clean about their plans to switch from Ferrari power to Renault power next season.

Seems they're only switching so it's less trouble for the team. (Using Red Bulls gearbox)

Thoughts on this?

Source: http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/105416
Drivers I like:
Raikkonen
Grosjean
Perez
Vettel

Teams I like:
Lotus
Merc
RBR
Marussia

User avatar
purchville
Posts: 3001
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:33 am

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by purchville »

I think reliability of the engines will be the big question for the new formula...but Renault do have plenty of experience in turbos! (as do Ferrari). At the end of the day I think their competitiveness, apart from reliability, will still come down to chassis...I hope to see some big improvements in that regard this year..
PF1 Pick 10 Competition:
- 6 victories (Italy '19, Mexico '18, Singapore '18, USA '17, USA '16, Mexico '16),
- 6 podiums
- 2013 Rookie of the Year
- 2014 Championship 6th position
- 2016 Championship 9th position

User avatar
dizlexik
Posts: 7796
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:07 pm

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by dizlexik »

So Renault will power 5 out of 11 teams in 2014?
eeee

greenwizard13

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by greenwizard13 »

:? F1 is slowly turning into Formula Renault. I wish there were more engine manufacturers present...

Ferrari, Mercedes, Renault, Honda, BMW and Toyota each supplying two teams would be perfect imo.

User avatar
Placid
Posts: 2467
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 2:14 am
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by Placid »

dizlexik wrote:So Renault will power 5 out of 11 teams in 2014?


The Renault powered teams:
Lotus (Main Manufacturer)
Red Bull
Williams
Caterham
along with Scuderia Toro Rosso

potter84
Posts: 793
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 10:08 am
Location: Derby

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by potter84 »

Placid wrote:
dizlexik wrote:So Renault will power 5 out of 11 teams in 2014?


The Renault powered teams:
Lotus (Main Manufacturer)
Red Bull
Williams
Caterham
along with Scuderia Toro Rosso

Renault have stated that they consider red bull their priority over anyone else, i thought that weird at the time as Renault was the previous guise of lotus, but i guess money and success talks loudest

User avatar
infi24r
Posts: 2203
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:41 am

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by infi24r »

potter84 wrote:
Placid wrote:
dizlexik wrote:So Renault will power 5 out of 11 teams in 2014?


The Renault powered teams:
Lotus (Main Manufacturer)
Red Bull
Williams
Caterham
along with Scuderia Toro Rosso

Renault have stated that they consider red bull their priority over anyone else, i thought that weird at the time as Renault was the previous guise of lotus, but i guess money and success talks loudest

F1 is all about PR for the car manufacturers, they will make whoever is winning their team.

I'm sure if the Red Bull brand ever wanted out that Renault would buy the team.

User avatar
Johnston
Posts: 6587
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 6:41 pm

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by Johnston »

We'll probably see a few swaps going on.

Like the Williams to Merc rumour, FI to Ferrari, Sauber to Merc.

Then the Honda rumours. Might be BS but Honda have a habit of developing things to new regs even if they aren't intending to carry them through. So who knows who they have been talking too if they are building one.
Disclaimer: The above post maybe tongue in cheek.

"I thought I'd get your theories, mock them, then embrace my own. The usual."

potter84
Posts: 793
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 10:08 am
Location: Derby

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by potter84 »

I hope Honda do its a chance for manufacturers to get in on the new regs before engines get properly bedded in i think there could be a be of a development race over the next few years getting the most out of them more established manufacturers the better as cosworth are likely dead in the water after this year.

User avatar
Banana Man
Posts: 2430
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:24 am

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by Banana Man »

greenwizard13 wrote::? F1 is slowly turning into Formula Renault. I wish there were more engine manufacturers present...

Ferrari, Mercedes, Renault, Honda, BMW and Toyota each supplying two teams would be perfect imo.


The problem is developing F1 engines to the extent that they are competitive is a very expensive business and they don't sell many units. I doubt there is a lot of money in it for a company like BMW, even taking the publicity into account.

If we aren't careful we will end up with garbage like Mechachrome, Asiatech and Playlife. Even the more recent Cosworth and Toyota engines were pretty poor.
I remember when this website was all fields.

funkymonkey
Posts: 1892
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:04 am

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by funkymonkey »

This move has nothing to do with Renault actually. It is all about TR being RBR sister company.
For next year when it is going to be complex design job for all teams to fit everything into totally different package, TR are not going to be doing their own work as they have done so far. They are going to use RBR gearboxes and other system (possibly hydraulics and electrical and other like KERS. ). They went on record to say that today. And this is mainly why they need to move to Renault as RBR is on renault. This makes it a lot of take it from here and put it there kinda deal between these two sister teams. Internals will be shared and just for technicality of rules, they will have 2 different chassis.
But this is huge advantage to these two come next season as lot of key systems will be shared. This mean twice the data, double test bed, and double feedback.

Frankly there are plenty of other technical partnerships in F1 which mainly focus on 1 or 2 part sharing and resource rentals type of deals, but this is going well beyond that next year. FIA and FOM rather just allow customer cars if this is going to go on like this. Or put a complete ban on things like this which honestly is not going to help F1 in today'c economic climate where small teams simply do not have all resources to compete completely independently.

User avatar
Toby.
Posts: 2834
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:09 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by Toby. »

FYI the "Scuderia" in "Scuderia Toro Rosso" doesn't have any direct relationship to Ferrari. "Scuderia" is the Italian name for the stables race horses are kept in. That's why we had Scuderia Italia.
Image

funkymonkey
Posts: 1892
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:04 am

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by funkymonkey »

Toby. wrote:FYI the "Scuderia" in "Scuderia Toro Rosso" doesn't have any direct relationship to Ferrari. "Scuderia" is the Italian name for the stables race horses are kept in. That's why we had Scuderia Italia.

Yup, its STR-Ferrari now just like it is Sauber - Ferrari. So it will be STR- Renault

User avatar
dizlexik
Posts: 7796
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:07 pm

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by dizlexik »

funkymonkey wrote:
Toby. wrote:FYI the "Scuderia" in "Scuderia Toro Rosso" doesn't have any direct relationship to Ferrari. "Scuderia" is the Italian name for the stables race horses are kept in. That's why we had Scuderia Italia.

Yup, its STR-Ferrari now just like it is Sauber - Ferrari. So it will be STR- Renault

Yep, they were already "Scuderia" with Cosworth engines.
eeee

j man
Posts: 3494
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 8:48 pm
Location: UK

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by j man »

Strange to have most of the teams with Renault engines when we are constantly told that they are underpowered compared to Merc and Ferrari. Maybe it's just a cost issue? Maybe they're looking well placed for the 2014 regs?

seesaw
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 3:59 am

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by seesaw »

^^ Probably one of the major reasons for that is because, AFAIK, Mercedes and Ferrari don't have any intention of supplying more than three teams - including themselves, which is completely different stand from Renault's. (French car manufacturer would be happy to supply as many teams as necessary)

That said, Wolff said yesterday 'Fourth engine manufacturer' could join F1.

garagetinkerer
Posts: 2412
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by garagetinkerer »

funkymonkey wrote:This move has nothing to do with Renault actually. It is all about TR being RBR sister company.
For next year when it is going to be complex design job for all teams to fit everything into totally different package, TR are not going to be doing their own work as they have done so far. They are going to use RBR gearboxes and other system (possibly hydraulics and electrical and other like KERS. ). They went on record to say that today. And this is mainly why they need to move to Renault as RBR is on renault. This makes it a lot of take it from here and put it there kinda deal between these two sister teams. Internals will be shared and just for technicality of rules, they will have 2 different chassis.
But this is huge advantage to these two come next season as lot of key systems will be shared. This mean twice the data, double test bed, and double feedback.

Frankly there are plenty of other technical partnerships in F1 which mainly focus on 1 or 2 part sharing and resource rentals type of deals, but this is going well beyond that next year. FIA and FOM rather just allow customer cars if this is going to go on like this. Or put a complete ban on things like this which honestly is not going to help F1 in today'c economic climate where small teams simply do not have all resources to compete completely independently.

FIA's rule was always specific to complete car, even if parts were the same, as f1 always had engine suppliers since god knows when. that was my understanding of the rule you mentioned. teams with customer engines built their own gearboxes not because of regulation, but for competitive advantage.
My Top 5 drivers of all times:
1) Prost/ Schumacher
3) Fangio
4) Lauda
5) Brabham

if you don't like it, too bad! There's a reason why it says "My Top 5"

RunningMan
Posts: 5712
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 6:29 pm
Location: u.k

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by RunningMan »

seesaw wrote:^^ Probably one of the major reasons for that is because, AFAIK, Mercedes and Ferrari don't have any intention of supplying more than three teams - including themselves, which is completely different stand from Renault's. (French car manufacturer would be happy to supply as many teams as necessary)

That said, Wolff said yesterday 'Fourth engine manufacturer' could join F1.


Also the renault engine throughout last season was widely rumored to be on of the most fuel efficient in the paddock. Meaning less starting weight. However, that side of things will probably change drastically come 2014
Winter is Coming

funkymonkey
Posts: 1892
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:04 am

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by funkymonkey »

garagetinkerer wrote:
funkymonkey wrote:This move has nothing to do with Renault actually. It is all about TR being RBR sister company.
For next year when it is going to be complex design job for all teams to fit everything into totally different package, TR are not going to be doing their own work as they have done so far. They are going to use RBR gearboxes and other system (possibly hydraulics and electrical and other like KERS. ). They went on record to say that today. And this is mainly why they need to move to Renault as RBR is on renault. This makes it a lot of take it from here and put it there kinda deal between these two sister teams. Internals will be shared and just for technicality of rules, they will have 2 different chassis.
But this is huge advantage to these two come next season as lot of key systems will be shared. This mean twice the data, double test bed, and double feedback.

Frankly there are plenty of other technical partnerships in F1 which mainly focus on 1 or 2 part sharing and resource rentals type of deals, but this is going well beyond that next year. FIA and FOM rather just allow customer cars if this is going to go on like this. Or put a complete ban on things like this which honestly is not going to help F1 in today'c economic climate where small teams simply do not have all resources to compete completely independently.

FIA's rule was always specific to complete car, even if parts were the same, as f1 always had engine suppliers since god knows when. that was my understanding of the rule you mentioned. teams with customer engines built their own gearboxes not because of regulation, but for competitive advantage.



Yes I know the rule, what I meant to say is that with this level of collaboration (or rather passing of parts and even dictating driver choice and top management decisions of other team ) happening and FIA's in ability to avoid clear sister team advantage on and off the track, it would be better if they just allowed customer cars again back into F1. This way we will see more quality cars on the track with some smaller teams running good fundamental chassis setup and competing much better than what we have seen from bottom 3 teams for last 3 years.

Personally I hate the TR and had more respect for HRT and still have more respect for Marussia and Caterham. TR is just becoming a puppet at this point. More blatant puppet as years go by.

Danny_Boy99
Posts: 122
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:59 pm
Location: Milton Keynes

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by Danny_Boy99 »

Toby. wrote:FYI the "Scuderia" in "Scuderia Toro Rosso" doesn't have any direct relationship to Ferrari. "Scuderia" is the Italian name for the stables race horses are kept in. That's why we had Scuderia Italia.


Sorry, I didn't know that haha. I'll correct the title.

EDIT: If I knew how to...
Drivers I like:
Raikkonen
Grosjean
Perez
Vettel

Teams I like:
Lotus
Merc
RBR
Marussia

Muzzyf1
Posts: 219
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:25 am

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by Muzzyf1 »

RTR = READY TO RUN sounds like what the rc world calls cheap cars intended for little kids or novices.
Fitting for a crap team like TR puppet team for RBR and vettel

User avatar
Toby.
Posts: 2834
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:09 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by Toby. »

Danny_Boy99 wrote:
Toby. wrote:FYI the "Scuderia" in "Scuderia Toro Rosso" doesn't have any direct relationship to Ferrari. "Scuderia" is the Italian name for the stables race horses are kept in. That's why we had Scuderia Italia.


Sorry, I didn't know that haha. I'll correct the title.

EDIT: If I knew how to...


If you still want to, edit your original post and it should be just above the comment section. :)
Image

User avatar
ATM2
Posts: 482
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:41 pm
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by ATM2 »

[quote]RTR = READY TO RUN sounds like what the rc world calls cheap cars intended for little kids or novices.
Fitting for a crap team like TR puppet team for RBR and vettel[quote]

Eh, not a very flattering to say about Toro Rosso but I guess they somewhat deserved it. Not that they had a chance of going another way around either.
Let's not forget that before being Toro Rosso they were Minardi and with one leg in the grave, so historically they did make some progress from their roots. Anyway, what more can it be expected from a 2nd team, mix it up with the big boys upfront? that will only lead to more suspicion and conspiracy theories. I can only see how everybody would jump to the roof if, per say, a Toro Rosso would slow down at start a Ferrari, for RBR to catch up. IMO I like Toro Rosso exactly where they are now - at the back of the grid. This way, they can't play ball to big sister too much, except when lapped.
Olivier Panis fan.
...and also Jenson Button fan.

aryaputhra
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 9:07 am

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by aryaputhra »

They should have the Buggatti brand in F1. *wishful thinking*

User avatar
ScuderiaFerrari
Posts: 229
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:57 am

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by ScuderiaFerrari »

I think there Force India were thinking of changing power acks from Mercedes to Ferrari.
Scuderia Ferrari

P-F1 Mod
Posts: 4205
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:21 am

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by P-F1 Mod »

Toby. wrote:
Danny_Boy99 wrote:
Toby. wrote:FYI the "Scuderia" in "Scuderia Toro Rosso" doesn't have any direct relationship to Ferrari. "Scuderia" is the Italian name for the stables race horses are kept in. That's why we had Scuderia Italia.


Sorry, I didn't know that haha. I'll correct the title.

EDIT: If I knew how to...


If you still want to, edit your original post and it should be just above the comment section. :)

Renamed on your behalf, Danny Boy.

User avatar
sultanofhyd
Posts: 830
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 11:45 am

Re: STR to RTR?

Post by sultanofhyd »

dizlexik wrote:So Renault will power 5 out of 11 teams in 2014?


It is because they make the best engines now, have made the best engines decades ago, and the teams trust they will make the best engines again, contrary to popular myth.
Apparently religious people didn't like my signature, hah! Don't read it if you are so offended by it.

When one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion. - Robert Pirsig

seesaw
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 3:59 am

Re: Toro Rosso to switch to Renault engines

Post by seesaw »

Reading this interview, I can see why teams would prefer Renault engine.

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2013/02/05/2 ... i-allison/
2009 was a ripple, 2014 will be a tsunami – James Allison

“I think one of the lovely things about Renault is they’re a very, very even-handed engine supplier”, “They will be delighted if all of their teams are fighting tooth and nail for pole position amongst one another and they genuinely don’t offer technical preference to one team over another.”

“Not only do they offer this even-handed approach, but they’re also extremely conscious of the fact that they need to make a car that works well in 2014, not an engine that works well, so they want they whole package to work.”, “So they are very considerate in asking the chassis people what we think is important and then trying to bring that to the engine. We certainly feel that we’re given lots of attention by Renault.”

Post Reply