It is currently Fri Jul 10, 2020 3:27 pm

All times are UTC


Forum rules


Please read the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject: Williams
PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2020 11:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:08 am
Posts: 280
Up for sale

First thing any investor is going to do is follow the other small team blue print and get parts from the manufactures

Amazed Claire Williams still hasn't stepped down.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2020 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:49 pm
Posts: 27
I'm a big Claire Williams fan and I've desperately hoped for the team to make the changes that they need to do in order to be competitive but, much as I'd love her to stay on, I think Claire Williams needs to go as she's too stuck in the past with regards to what an F1 team is.

I've seen numerous interviews over the years and she often goes on about them being a real manufacturer and taking pride in the fact that they basically make near everything from scratch themselves and implying that you're something of a lightweight or customer team if you so much as buy a bolt off the shelf.

I love their history, I love her passion and commitment but I think they need someone without the emotional baggage who can come in make good, long term decisions. She said in the Drive to Survive that they wouldn't save much by buying a gearbox as they'd have to pay off their staff with redundancies from that department - but I think they need to bite the bullet and adapt to the world of motorsport as it currently is. Take a leaf out of Racing Point or Haas's book. You're not betraying your past by doing what you need to do to survive.

I really hope they find a buyer / investor who gets the team and who can make the changes needed to get them back to the front.

_________________
Watching from the cheap seats.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2020 2:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:31 am
Posts: 335
klevispin wrote:
She said in the Drive to Survive that they wouldn't save much by buying a gearbox as they'd have to pay off their staff with redundancies from that department - but I think they need to bite the bullet and adapt to the world of motorsport as it currently is.


100%. That is pretty dumb logic tbh. Yeah you might have to pay redundancies if they can’t be placed elsewhere, but that would be a once off payout. So you’d take a hit year 1, but you’d be saving money in the long run.

Is she thinking she’d have to be paying for gearboxes + redundancies forever?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2020 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 11:46 am
Posts: 401
Location: Suffolk, UK
Sad news, but not in the least surprising. I hope the team will be renamed, and not carry on as a shadow of what it once was. As has been mentioned Claire will have to go, and the whole ethos come into the 21st Century. What emerges will have nothing to do with Frank and Patrick's successful past, so it should be separated from it by a new identity. We don't want the Lotus name saga to be repeated..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Wed Jun 03, 2020 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:53 pm
Posts: 1894
Location: Canada
klevispin wrote:
I'm a big Claire Williams fan and I've desperately hoped for the team to make the changes that they need to do in order to be competitive but, much as I'd love her to stay on, I think Claire Williams needs to go as she's too stuck in the past with regards to what an F1 team is.

I've seen numerous interviews over the years and she often goes on about them being a real manufacturer and taking pride in the fact that they basically make near everything from scratch themselves and implying that you're something of a lightweight or customer team if you so much as buy a bolt off the shelf.

I love their history, I love her passion and commitment but I think they need someone without the emotional baggage who can come in make good, long term decisions. She said in the Drive to Survive that they wouldn't save much by buying a gearbox as they'd have to pay off their staff with redundancies from that department - but I think they need to bite the bullet and adapt to the world of motorsport as it currently is. Take a leaf out of Racing Point or Haas's book. You're not betraying your past by doing what you need to do to survive.

I really hope they find a buyer / investor who gets the team and who can make the changes needed to get them back to the front.

Well said. I love Williams and hope something good can come of this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:08 am
Posts: 280
“The investment that we're looking for is going to help us achieve that. So for me, this is a good thing what we're doing, and it shouldn't be looked at in a negative, disappointing way, or anything other than positive"

How does she still have a job?!

I cant think of a worse managed team in the entire time i've been watching F1 (20+years). This crazy ideology they could compete with the big manufactures on a fraction of the budget whilst keeping everything in house has caused all this mess. It was an absolute no brainer when they have had the best engine in the hybrid era. Theyre now trying to find investment whilst the entire world economy is stagnant and they are glued to the back of the grid for the forseeable future


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:31 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:31 am
Posts: 8286
Zazu wrote:
“The investment that we're looking for is going to help us achieve that. So for me, this is a good thing what we're doing, and it shouldn't be looked at in a negative, disappointing way, or anything other than positive"

How does she still have a job?!

I cant think of a worse managed team in the entire time i've been watching F1 (20+years). This crazy ideology they could compete with the big manufactures on a fraction of the budget whilst keeping everything in house has caused all this mess. It was an absolute no brainer when they have had the best engine in the hybrid era. Theyre now trying to find investment whilst the entire world economy is stagnant and they are glued to the back of the grid for the forseeable future


That statement is as close to a Ronspeak as it gets for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Wed Jun 03, 2020 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 5:38 pm
Posts: 2343
Location: Miami, Florida
:lol: :lol: :lol:

I know you mean Ron Dennis, but I couldn't help but think L. Ron Hubbard and his gift for all thing BS!!! LMAO!!!

_________________
HAMILTON :: VERSTAPPEN :: LECLERC :: BOTTAS :: VETTEL :: SAINZ :: NORRIS
KVYAT :: RAIKKONEN :: RUSSEL :: ALBON :: RICCIARDO :: HULKENBURG :: PEREZ
STROLL :: MAGNUSSEN :: GROSJEAN :: GASLY :: GIOVANAZZI :: KUBICA


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Wed Jun 03, 2020 4:57 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:31 am
Posts: 8286
F1 MERCENARY wrote:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

I know you mean Ron Dennis, but I couldn't help but think L. Ron Hubbard and his gift for all thing BS!!! LMAO!!!

:D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Wed Jun 03, 2020 5:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 8:48 pm
Posts: 3406
Location: UK
Zazu wrote:
“The investment that we're looking for is going to help us achieve that. So for me, this is a good thing what we're doing, and it shouldn't be looked at in a negative, disappointing way, or anything other than positive"

How does she still have a job?!

I cant think of a worse managed team in the entire time i've been watching F1 (20+years). This crazy ideology they could compete with the big manufactures on a fraction of the budget whilst keeping everything in house has caused all this mess. It was an absolute no brainer when they have had the best engine in the hybrid era. Theyre now trying to find investment whilst the entire world economy is stagnant and they are glued to the back of the grid for the forseeable future

Whilst I agree that Williams' approach is not really feasible in the current F1 environment, I would still applaud them for sticking to their principles and at least trying to do things properly. For the sake of the purity of the competition I would much rather have Williams glued to the back of the grid than replace them with another Toro Rosso / Alpha Tauri or whatever ghastly marketing exercise they've been turned into now.

Williams' desire to design and build their own car should not be an unrealistic goal for an F1 team. That they are not able to do so while competing as a sustainable operation should reflect more poorly on F1 than it does on Williams.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:49 pm 
Online

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 17029
j man wrote:
Zazu wrote:
“The investment that we're looking for is going to help us achieve that. So for me, this is a good thing what we're doing, and it shouldn't be looked at in a negative, disappointing way, or anything other than positive"

How does she still have a job?!

I cant think of a worse managed team in the entire time i've been watching F1 (20+years). This crazy ideology they could compete with the big manufactures on a fraction of the budget whilst keeping everything in house has caused all this mess. It was an absolute no brainer when they have had the best engine in the hybrid era. Theyre now trying to find investment whilst the entire world economy is stagnant and they are glued to the back of the grid for the forseeable future

Whilst I agree that Williams' approach is not really feasible in the current F1 environment, I would still applaud them for sticking to their principles and at least trying to do things properly. For the sake of the purity of the competition I would much rather have Williams glued to the back of the grid than replace them with another Toro Rosso / Alpha Tauri or whatever ghastly marketing exercise they've been turned into now.

Williams' desire to design and build their own car should not be an unrealistic goal for an F1 team. That they are not able to do so while competing as a sustainable operation should reflect more poorly on F1 than it does on Williams.


I agree 100%. The model they run should be applauded. The environment they run it in is the problem. We need more Williams and less Alpha Tauri if F1 is to improve and get more competitive.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Wed Jun 03, 2020 10:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 8:07 am
Posts: 1398
I understand what Claire is saying but I also see straight through it. This must have been one painful decision to have come to.
No one is falling for the "it's a positive thing" BS - it's a last resort and we all know they would only consider when all other options have failed.

What's not really being acknowledged out loud is that whilst this ensure the survival of a team and therefore a workforce, whatever is painted on the car, it signals the end of Williams. As a team Williams 'brand' is built on the family, the history and the fierce independence in how they operate.

Once that control, that identify-defining level of character is diluted or gone, the brand is gone. It won't be Williams if a Williams isn't in charge or is being compromised in their decisions. I know there are countless other examples you could cite where the team has lived on with the originators name after they have gone (Brabham, Sauber, McLaren, even Ferrari) but this feels different to me at least.

I'll be happy to see the Williams name stay on because we all love tradition and history in this sport, but I won't view the team with the same level of affection. Sad days indeed.

_________________
"I'd rather lose a race going fast enough to win it, than win one going slow enough to lose it".
-Stirling Moss


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:59 am
Posts: 139
I look forward to the nest 3-4 years I think things are in place for recovery Paddy Lowe has a lot to answer for in this saga.

Claire is taking a lot of flak when it's not her fault that a top designer made the worst job of his career she did the right thing and sacked him, it will take time to recover from that.
The new rules down the line will help no end,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 7:15 am 
Online

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 17029
kimandsally wrote:
I look forward to the nest 3-4 years I think things are in place for recovery Paddy Lowe has a lot to answer for in this saga.

Claire is taking a lot of flak when it's not her fault that a top designer made the worst job of his career she did the right thing and sacked him, it will take time to recover from that.
The new rules down the line will help no end,


What did Paddy do wrong?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 7:59 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 3:53 am
Posts: 7785
Location: Michigan, USA
mikeyg123 wrote:
kimandsally wrote:
I look forward to the nest 3-4 years I think things are in place for recovery Paddy Lowe has a lot to answer for in this saga.

Claire is taking a lot of flak when it's not her fault that a top designer made the worst job of his career she did the right thing and sacked him, it will take time to recover from that.
The new rules down the line will help no end,

What did Paddy do wrong?

Well, he oversaw the development of an absolutely awful car. The guy in charge of the technical department can't be absolved of all blame for such a categorical failure of a design.

_________________
PICK 10 COMPETITION (4 wins, 15 podiums): 3rd in 2016
TOP THREE CHAMPIONSHIP (No Limit Excedrin Racing): Champions in 2015 & 2018 | 2nd in 2017 & 2019
AUTOSPORT GP PREDICTOR: 2017 USA & P-F1 Champion


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 8:07 am 
Online

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 17029
Exediron wrote:
mikeyg123 wrote:
kimandsally wrote:
I look forward to the nest 3-4 years I think things are in place for recovery Paddy Lowe has a lot to answer for in this saga.

Claire is taking a lot of flak when it's not her fault that a top designer made the worst job of his career she did the right thing and sacked him, it will take time to recover from that.
The new rules down the line will help no end,

What did Paddy do wrong?

Well, he oversaw the development of an absolutely awful car. The guy in charge of the technical department can't be absolved of all blame for such a categorical failure of a design.


It seems odd to me that someone with a very good track record suddenly just did a bad job.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 5:38 pm
Posts: 2343
Location: Miami, Florida
DOLOMITE wrote:
As a team Williams 'brand' is built on the family, the history and the fierce independence in how they operate.

Once that control, that identify-defining level of character is diluted or gone, the brand is gone. It won't be Williams if a Williams isn't in charge or is being compromised in their decisions. I know there are countless other examples you could cite where the team has lived on with the originators name after they have gone (Brabham, Sauber, McLaren, even Ferrari) but this feels different to me at least.

It only feels different because Williams or more like Ferrari in that they've been in it from day 1 and have been self sustaining all this time without the assistance of anyone, with the exception of the BMW era which always felt like an embattled existence with BMW wanting to call the shots over Frank and Patrick. Sauber has been in it for less time, but they've switched hands several times over the years, and while I love the team and their founder and feel they should be a mainstay in F1, they don't have the rich history in the sport to the likes and level of Williams.

Ferrari is different in that regardless what's going on with the parent company, the F1 operation is for all intents and purposes a sole entity tied to the road car division for the old adage of win on Sunday, sell on Monday, and the images of the Tifosi supporting the brand in every single palce around the globe helps them sell product like no other which generates revenue.

McLaren was started by Bruce and then was led by Teddy Mayer after his passing and the team was quite successful under his leadership across several disciplines, but eventually they merged with Ron Dennis' Project 4 Racing thanks to Marlboro forcing Teddy Mayer out in favor of Ron, with whom they had a standing relationship with. The question there in is, did McLaren cease to exist and Project 4 was merely re-badged as McLaren or was it the other way around? Either way, as far as I recall, McLaren has never been thought of as not being the same McLaren it always was, so I'm not so sure Williams would be thought of differently either. The vast majority of existing personnel will remain and will continue to do the work, only with new leadership in certain areas, just as Sauber has under it's new Alpha Romeo branding. It's still Sauber F1 to me.

_________________
HAMILTON :: VERSTAPPEN :: LECLERC :: BOTTAS :: VETTEL :: SAINZ :: NORRIS
KVYAT :: RAIKKONEN :: RUSSEL :: ALBON :: RICCIARDO :: HULKENBURG :: PEREZ
STROLL :: MAGNUSSEN :: GROSJEAN :: GASLY :: GIOVANAZZI :: KUBICA


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 2:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:53 pm
Posts: 139
I think it's remarkable that Williams lasted this long with the same ethos they had in the 90's. For me, the decline began in 1998. I remember seeing the Winfield cars pootling around and being amazed how quickly the team had fallen. The loss of Adrian Newey and Renault was massive, and the purism of Frank Williams and Patrick Head meant that Williams were always going to find it hard to turn things around.
The brief renaissance with BMW sadly didn't lead anywhere and I suspect the appointment of Claire Williams was more about ensuring that the Williams philosophy continued than anything else.

It will be interesting to see who buys Williams in such an economic environment. A company like Mahindra? A Middle-East investment company? SAIC or Geely?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 8:50 am 
Online

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 17029
Reports that Toto has bought a 5% share in Williams. That now gives him a financial interest in three different teams.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 8:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:14 am
Posts: 1777
mikeyg123 wrote:
Reports that Toto has bought a 5% share in Williams. That now gives him a financial interest in three different teams.


I’m surprised there isn’t some sort of rule against that on the basis of conflict of interest.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 8:53 am 
Online

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 17029
JN23 wrote:
mikeyg123 wrote:
Reports that Toto has bought a 5% share in Williams. That now gives him a financial interest in three different teams.


I’m surprised there isn’t some sort of rule against that on the basis of conflict of interest.


Well I guess if someone can fully own two teams having a minority stake it three is almost small beer.

I remember Flavio buying Ligier in 95 just so he could transfer the Renault Engine supply to Bennetton.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 9:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 6:08 pm
Posts: 4590
What we need is for Toto to move to Williams now and start sorting things out from the inside!!!!!

_________________
Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. [Lord Acton]
My own Google Earth Motor Sport file. http://www.mediafire.com/?jzm1ieatytv
Instagram @simply_italian_car_pics


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:53 pm
Posts: 139
mikeyg123 wrote:
Reports that Toto has bought a 5% share in Williams. That now gives him a financial interest in three different teams.


Do you have a source for that? I know he had shares in Williams previously - he sold his last shares in Williams in 2016 - but it would seem strange to buy into a 3rd team. Then again, an investment is an investment and it didn't really trouble anyone in F1 when he had a 30% stake in Mercedes F1 and 15% in Williams at the same time and I doubt it would be a problem now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:29 am 
Online

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 17029
Arbitrarius wrote:
mikeyg123 wrote:
Reports that Toto has bought a 5% share in Williams. That now gives him a financial interest in three different teams.


Do you have a source for that? I know he had shares in Williams previously - he sold his last shares in Williams in 2016 - but it would seem strange to buy into a 3rd team. Then again, an investment is an investment and it didn't really trouble anyone in F1 when he had a 30% stake in Mercedes F1 and 15% in Williams at the same time and I doubt it would be a problem now.


Peter Windsor on Twitter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:53 pm
Posts: 139
mikeyg123 wrote:
Arbitrarius wrote:
mikeyg123 wrote:
Reports that Toto has bought a 5% share in Williams. That now gives him a financial interest in three different teams.


Do you have a source for that? I know he had shares in Williams previously - he sold his last shares in Williams in 2016 - but it would seem strange to buy into a 3rd team. Then again, an investment is an investment and it didn't really trouble anyone in F1 when he had a 30% stake in Mercedes F1 and 15% in Williams at the same time and I doubt it would be a problem now.


Peter Windsor on Twitter.


Thanks! Windsor has tweeted a correction of sorts. Wolff hasn't bought a 5% stake in Williams:

Peter Windsor:
Re Toto's 5 per cent in WilliamsF1: Merc point out that it is a Security and thus technically not a "buy-back". A Security is "a first-priority Interest in favour of the Security Agent in respect of all of the shares in such Owner". Make of that what you will.


I think the security agent is the entity arranging the sale, and Wolff has put himself in a position of priority for 5%.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 2875
Location: England
Didn't Briatore have a similar sort of thing going on in the 90s? Benneton, Ligier and I think Minardi he had a stake in.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition 2019:
Current positon: 14th | 4 Podiums | 5 Wins
2018 Pick 10 Champion


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:59 am
Posts: 139
Pleased Toto has invested it shows he believes in Williams as they say money talks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 5:38 pm
Posts: 2343
Location: Miami, Florida
Exediron wrote:
mikeyg123 wrote:
kimandsally wrote:
I look forward to the nest 3-4 years I think things are in place for recovery Paddy Lowe has a lot to answer for in this saga.

Claire is taking a lot of flak when it's not her fault that a top designer made the worst job of his career she did the right thing and sacked him, it will take time to recover from that.
The new rules down the line will help no end,

What did Paddy do wrong?

Well, he oversaw the development of an absolutely awful car. The guy in charge of the technical department can't be absolved of all blame for such a categorical failure of a design.

You and Exediron seem to know for sure what happened within Williams to know for sure that Paddy Lowe is to blame for Williams' current state.

This is what I just wrote in the Mercedes F1 thread…

F1 MERCENARY wrote:
If you read Montoya's opinion on Williams' current situation, you'd likely have seen the bit about how William's biggest problem is in HOW they utilize the top talent they recruit and hire. He feels they force people the likes of Paddy Lowe into performing job duties that are perhaps not their strong suit and thus create and build on their problems rather than right the ship, and I am inclined to agree.

With Paddy Lowe specifically, before being rehired by Williams, the teams he was with enjoyed periods of excellent performance success. However, once he reached Williams, much like Rob Smedley and others before him, we didn't get to see them in their usual roles and the team didn't improve much at all. When you acquire personnel the likes of a Paddy Lowe and a James Allen, a Ross Brawn, and Jean Todt, A Flavio Briatore, A Pat Frye, you have to let these people do what they do best in order for them to best help lead the team towards the front of the grid. Otherwise you end up with the cluster "YOU-KNOW-WHAT" we're seeing with Williams where the team's only hope now is to be sold and have nothing to do with the family/brand anymore.

_________________
HAMILTON :: VERSTAPPEN :: LECLERC :: BOTTAS :: VETTEL :: SAINZ :: NORRIS
KVYAT :: RAIKKONEN :: RUSSEL :: ALBON :: RICCIARDO :: HULKENBURG :: PEREZ
STROLL :: MAGNUSSEN :: GROSJEAN :: GASLY :: GIOVANAZZI :: KUBICA


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 11:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:17 pm
Posts: 737
Location: illinois
i made my peace with williams, not being williams anymore a few seasons ago. at the moment, yes williams is still a constructor and run by a williams. i just figured their downward spiral was always going to end this way. someone may purchase them, even keep the name, but it isn't the same to me

from the outside it looks as if toto just made a short term investment. hoping someone offers bigger bucks than he put it. it does seem plenty are interested in taking over the team though


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2020 6:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:07 pm
Posts: 10062
Are they selling the rights to the Williams name as well?

_________________
Räikkönen - Vettel - Bottas
Thank you Nico - You´re the champ!

PF1 Pick 10 Competition 2016: CHAMPION (2 wins, 8 podiums)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2020 2:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:49 am
Posts: 919
Surely its the end of Williams


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Williams
PostPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:12 pm 
Online

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 17029
pc27b wrote:
i made my peace with williams, not being williams anymore a few seasons ago. at the moment, yes williams is still a constructor and run by a williams. i just figured their downward spiral was always going to end this way. someone may purchase them, even keep the name, but it isn't the same to me

from the outside it looks as if toto just made a short term investment. hoping someone offers bigger bucks than he put it. it does seem plenty are interested in taking over the team though


I think that's a little harsh. People act like Williams have been at the back for forever but they were on the podium only a few seasons ago. Outside the big three they are still the most successful team in the Turbo era.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group