planetf1.com

Johnson wrote:

Zoue wrote:

Johnson wrote:Apparently he is on £20 million a year, more than double Red Bull. He went for money and to run from Max. He isn’t significantly less talented than Max but Max is better and has a higher ceiling and Max is Red Bulls darling.

Leaving Red Bull is probably Dans best chance of getting in a Ferrari or Mercedes. If he comfortably beats Hulk he will get one of those drives. He will be too hard to ignore. If he doesn’t, then he will quite possibly never win another race.

I don't think Max being Red Bull's darling had any real (as opposed to imagined) bearing on Ricciardo's chances of success there. It certainly didn't hurt his chances when he went up against Red Bull's then-darling Vettel in 2013. Ricciardo got pretty much thumped by Max last year and it's probable that deep down he knew he didn't have an answer. Every further year he gets beaten on talent - as opposed to any kind of perceived favouritism - will only diminish his chances elsewhere. But memories are very short in F1 and if he beats Hulk then people will quickly forget about his previous beating and he'll have a better chance at the top teams again, as you've said.

Mark Webber experienced it with Vettel, the fact the Webber wasn't backed in the 2010 title run in tells you a lot about how Red Bull operate. Yes it ended out well for Red Bull but it doesn't change the decision and who they wanted to win the title and break records. The same at Mercedes, Mercedes would massively prefer Hamilton to win the title over Bottas and why wouldn't they. Its more records and marketing dream which ultimately sells more cars.

2014, Riccairdo was so much quicker it was not relevant. I don't think Ricciardo was heavily beaten at all last year either. He put in a good account of himself, there was very little between them when both had fully functioning cars. No doubt, Verstappen edges him on talent but they both won 2 races each. Although if Verstappen was a bit less error prone that could have been 4-0

pokerman wrote:

Randine wrote:

Zoue wrote:

Johnson wrote:

Zoue wrote: I don't think Max being Red Bull's darling had any real (as opposed to imagined) bearing on Ricciardo's chances of success there. It certainly didn't hurt his chances when he went up against Red Bull's then-darling Vettel in 2013. Ricciardo got pretty much thumped by Max last year and it's probable that deep down he knew he didn't have an answer. Every further year he gets beaten on talent - as opposed to any kind of perceived favouritism - will only diminish his chances elsewhere. But memories are very short in F1 and if he beats Hulk then people will quickly forget about his previous beating and he'll have a better chance at the top teams again, as you've said.

Mark Webber experienced it with Vettel, the fact the Webber wasn't backed in the 2010 title run in tells you a lot about how Red Bull operate. Yes it ended out well for Red Bull but it doesn't change the decision and who they wanted to win the title and break records. The same at Mercedes, Mercedes would massively prefer Hamilton to win the title over Bottas and why wouldn't they. Its more records and marketing dream which ultimately sells more cars.

2014, Riccairdo was so much quicker it was not relevant. I don't think Ricciardo was heavily beaten at all last year either. He put in a good account of himself, there was very little between them when both had fully functioning cars. No doubt, Verstappen edges him on talent but they both won 2 races each. Although if Verstappen was a bit less error prone that could have been 4-0

The only thing Mark Webber experienced at Red Bull was him not being good enough. If he hadn't binned it in Korea then he'd have taken the WDC title that year, but the fact he didn't was down to him and him alone. And he qualified atrociously in Abu Dhabi to give himself even more of a mountain to climb. Red Bull gave him everything he needed for the title but Webber didn't deliver.

I don't really see evidence that Mercedes would rather Hamilton win, it's just that he's the most obvious candidate to back as he's a proven winner and if he's given the tools he'll deliver. Bit like the situation at Ferrari today - they'll back Vettel because he's shown he can do it, but they'll still pop the champagne if Leclerc gets it instead. And Ricciardo is extremely marketable, so I can't see any logic in Red Bull not wanting him to do well, either. He just wasn't as good as Max.

Ricciardo was pretty comprehensively beaten IMO. Max made a number of mistakes but in terms of pace and ability it's obvious who was the better driver. If Max hadn't been so impetuous then the gap would have been even bigger - as you say, it could/should have been 4 wins for Max and Ricciardo can probably count his blessings that Max didn't maximise his chances, but at the end of the day Max can work on his mistakes but it's less likely that Ricciardo can find extra speed.

Having said that, Ricciardo's a pretty competent driver, it's just unfortunate for him that he had someone like Max partner him just when it looked like the world was his at Red Bull. But the way things turned out had nothing to do with who Red Bull preferred, just down to which driver performed better.

I think you are giving zero consideration of how circumstances effect driver performance or even effort to say Max thumped Dan.

Dan has been promised a championship winning car for 5 years, and for 5 years Red Bull have not delivered.
Dan was 20 points behind after 6 races with 2 wins to each or Ham, Vettel and Dan.
Red Bull publicly announced they were building the team around Max and then show favouritism by saying each driver was equal to blame in Baku, when most experts thought Max was in the wrong.
Followed up by 8 or so engine retirements, and at other times, he was just nursing the engine home each race when he wasn’t in a good position (so that engine would not jeopardise the next race), Dan could not and did not show anything like what he is capable of in 2018.
Apart from that he beat max in 2016 and 2017 in the driver standings.

Have you ever been overlooked for a promotion at work? Or seen someone around you getting favouritism, whether it be friends earning more, a guy that gets all the girls etc.
We are all human, and to not even factor in the politics going on at Red Bull is very short sighted imho.

Red Bull didn't deliver mainly because of the Renault engine, all these engine retirements he had last season and then he goes and signs up with Renault, that makes a lot of sense?

Zoue wrote:

pokerman wrote:

Randine wrote:

Zoue wrote:

Johnson wrote: Mark Webber experienced it with Vettel, the fact the Webber wasn't backed in the 2010 title run in tells you a lot about how Red Bull operate. Yes it ended out well for Red Bull but it doesn't change the decision and who they wanted to win the title and break records. The same at Mercedes, Mercedes would massively prefer Hamilton to win the title over Bottas and why wouldn't they. Its more records and marketing dream which ultimately sells more cars.

2014, Riccairdo was so much quicker it was not relevant. I don't think Ricciardo was heavily beaten at all last year either. He put in a good account of himself, there was very little between them when both had fully functioning cars. No doubt, Verstappen edges him on talent but they both won 2 races each. Although if Verstappen was a bit less error prone that could have been 4-0

The only thing Mark Webber experienced at Red Bull was him not being good enough. If he hadn't binned it in Korea then he'd have taken the WDC title that year, but the fact he didn't was down to him and him alone. And he qualified atrociously in Abu Dhabi to give himself even more of a mountain to climb. Red Bull gave him everything he needed for the title but Webber didn't deliver.

I don't really see evidence that Mercedes would rather Hamilton win, it's just that he's the most obvious candidate to back as he's a proven winner and if he's given the tools he'll deliver. Bit like the situation at Ferrari today - they'll back Vettel because he's shown he can do it, but they'll still pop the champagne if Leclerc gets it instead. And Ricciardo is extremely marketable, so I can't see any logic in Red Bull not wanting him to do well, either. He just wasn't as good as Max.

Ricciardo was pretty comprehensively beaten IMO. Max made a number of mistakes but in terms of pace and ability it's obvious who was the better driver. If Max hadn't been so impetuous then the gap would have been even bigger - as you say, it could/should have been 4 wins for Max and Ricciardo can probably count his blessings that Max didn't maximise his chances, but at the end of the day Max can work on his mistakes but it's less likely that Ricciardo can find extra speed.

Having said that, Ricciardo's a pretty competent driver, it's just unfortunate for him that he had someone like Max partner him just when it looked like the world was his at Red Bull. But the way things turned out had nothing to do with who Red Bull preferred, just down to which driver performed better.

I think you are giving zero consideration of how circumstances effect driver performance or even effort to say Max thumped Dan.

Dan has been promised a championship winning car for 5 years, and for 5 years Red Bull have not delivered.
Dan was 20 points behind after 6 races with 2 wins to each or Ham, Vettel and Dan.
Red Bull publicly announced they were building the team around Max and then show favouritism by saying each driver was equal to blame in Baku, when most experts thought Max was in the wrong.
Followed up by 8 or so engine retirements, and at other times, he was just nursing the engine home each race when he wasn’t in a good position (so that engine would not jeopardise the next race), Dan could not and did not show anything like what he is capable of in 2018.
Apart from that he beat max in 2016 and 2017 in the driver standings.

Have you ever been overlooked for a promotion at work? Or seen someone around you getting favouritism, whether it be friends earning more, a guy that gets all the girls etc.
We are all human, and to not even factor in the politics going on at Red Bull is very short sighted imho.

Red Bull didn't deliver mainly because of the Renault engine, all these engine retirements he had last season and then he goes and signs up with Renault, that makes a lot of sense?

well, no more sense than the theory that went around at the time that Hamilton left McLaren in part because they kept making mistakes, then he went to Mercedes who were making even more mistakes with Schumacher and publicly admitted it.

I think there's sense in Ricciardo going to Renault if he feels he can't beat Max. At least he's going to a works team with decent funding, not a mid-field no-hoper

pokerman wrote:

Zoue wrote:

pokerman wrote:

Randine wrote:

Zoue wrote: The only thing Mark Webber experienced at Red Bull was him not being good enough. If he hadn't binned it in Korea then he'd have taken the WDC title that year, but the fact he didn't was down to him and him alone. And he qualified atrociously in Abu Dhabi to give himself even more of a mountain to climb. Red Bull gave him everything he needed for the title but Webber didn't deliver.

I don't really see evidence that Mercedes would rather Hamilton win, it's just that he's the most obvious candidate to back as he's a proven winner and if he's given the tools he'll deliver. Bit like the situation at Ferrari today - they'll back Vettel because he's shown he can do it, but they'll still pop the champagne if Leclerc gets it instead. And Ricciardo is extremely marketable, so I can't see any logic in Red Bull not wanting him to do well, either. He just wasn't as good as Max.

Ricciardo was pretty comprehensively beaten IMO. Max made a number of mistakes but in terms of pace and ability it's obvious who was the better driver. If Max hadn't been so impetuous then the gap would have been even bigger - as you say, it could/should have been 4 wins for Max and Ricciardo can probably count his blessings that Max didn't maximise his chances, but at the end of the day Max can work on his mistakes but it's less likely that Ricciardo can find extra speed.

Having said that, Ricciardo's a pretty competent driver, it's just unfortunate for him that he had someone like Max partner him just when it looked like the world was his at Red Bull. But the way things turned out had nothing to do with who Red Bull preferred, just down to which driver performed better.

I think you are giving zero consideration of how circumstances effect driver performance or even effort to say Max thumped Dan.

Dan has been promised a championship winning car for 5 years, and for 5 years Red Bull have not delivered.
Dan was 20 points behind after 6 races with 2 wins to each or Ham, Vettel and Dan.
Red Bull publicly announced they were building the team around Max and then show favouritism by saying each driver was equal to blame in Baku, when most experts thought Max was in the wrong.
Followed up by 8 or so engine retirements, and at other times, he was just nursing the engine home each race when he wasn’t in a good position (so that engine would not jeopardise the next race), Dan could not and did not show anything like what he is capable of in 2018.
Apart from that he beat max in 2016 and 2017 in the driver standings.

Have you ever been overlooked for a promotion at work? Or seen someone around you getting favouritism, whether it be friends earning more, a guy that gets all the girls etc.
We are all human, and to not even factor in the politics going on at Red Bull is very short sighted imho.

Red Bull didn't deliver mainly because of the Renault engine, all these engine retirements he had last season and then he goes and signs up with Renault, that makes a lot of sense?

well, no more sense than the theory that went around at the time that Hamilton left McLaren in part because they kept making mistakes, then he went to Mercedes who were making even more mistakes with Schumacher and publicly admitted it.

I think there's sense in Ricciardo going to Renault if he feels he can't beat Max. At least he's going to a works team with decent funding, not a mid-field no-hoper

I believe with Schumacher it was just mechanical issues, with McLaren it was also operational issues, I have to believe with Hamilton he saw something within McLaren which was more like a cancer hence the need to leave McLaren despite them finishing the season with the fastest car.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing but is it just coincidence that McLaren have not won a race since he left, he foresaw a decline in the team?

Regarding Ricciardo I would say there are early signs that he's made a mistake, Red Bull are clearly not in decline in fact with Honda we are seeing a possible resurgence?

In regards to Renault they are hardly going to do a Mercedes when they are not even prepared to spend the money that Mercedes spend.

Zoue wrote:

pokerman wrote:

Zoue wrote:

pokerman wrote:

Randine wrote: I think you are giving zero consideration of how circumstances effect driver performance or even effort to say Max thumped Dan.

Dan has been promised a championship winning car for 5 years, and for 5 years Red Bull have not delivered.
Dan was 20 points behind after 6 races with 2 wins to each or Ham, Vettel and Dan.
Red Bull publicly announced they were building the team around Max and then show favouritism by saying each driver was equal to blame in Baku, when most experts thought Max was in the wrong.
Followed up by 8 or so engine retirements, and at other times, he was just nursing the engine home each race when he wasn’t in a good position (so that engine would not jeopardise the next race), Dan could not and did not show anything like what he is capable of in 2018.
Apart from that he beat max in 2016 and 2017 in the driver standings.

Have you ever been overlooked for a promotion at work? Or seen someone around you getting favouritism, whether it be friends earning more, a guy that gets all the girls etc.
We are all human, and to not even factor in the politics going on at Red Bull is very short sighted imho.

Red Bull didn't deliver mainly because of the Renault engine, all these engine retirements he had last season and then he goes and signs up with Renault, that makes a lot of sense?

well, no more sense than the theory that went around at the time that Hamilton left McLaren in part because they kept making mistakes, then he went to Mercedes who were making even more mistakes with Schumacher and publicly admitted it.

I think there's sense in Ricciardo going to Renault if he feels he can't beat Max. At least he's going to a works team with decent funding, not a mid-field no-hoper

I believe with Schumacher it was just mechanical issues, with McLaren it was also operational issues, I have to believe with Hamilton he saw something within McLaren which was more like a cancer hence the need to leave McLaren despite them finishing the season with the fastest car.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing but is it just coincidence that McLaren have not won a race since he left, he foresaw a decline in the team?

Regarding Ricciardo I would say there are early signs that he's made a mistake, Red Bull are clearly not in decline in fact with Honda we are seeing a possible resurgence?

In regards to Renault they are hardly going to do a Mercedes when they are not even prepared to spend the money that Mercedes spend.

What Hamilton saw is a whole other discussion. I don't think he was particularly prescient and McLaren had a really good car when he was there - I don't think he's ever given any indication that he left McLaren because they were about to go into decline, but more that he wanted to strike out on his own. The actual car was contender for the best of the year in terms of ability. My point was more that there were parallels with Ricciardo and Hamilton leaving their respective teams for ones which looked very much like a gamble and only time will tell if Ricciardo's will pay off like Hamilton's did.

In terms of car I'd agree with you that Ricciardo has traded down. But I suspect that his motivation was more driven by who was in the other seat than anything else. If he kept getting overshadowed by Max his stock would drop, but he's a capable driver and if he makes a good account of himself at Renault then even if they don't reach the top it'll put him in a better position for other top teams to consider him in the future. In that respect I think he's made a sensible choice, even if I didn't think so at the time.

Randine wrote:

Zoue wrote:

Johnson wrote:

Zoue wrote:

Johnson wrote: I don't think Max being Red Bull's darling had any real (as opposed to imagined) bearing on Ricciardo's chances of success there. It certainly didn't hurt his chances when he went up against Red Bull's then-darling Vettel in 2013. Ricciardo got pretty much thumped by Max last year and it's probable that deep down he knew he didn't have an answer. Every further year he gets beaten on talent - as opposed to any kind of perceived favouritism - will only diminish his chances elsewhere. But memories are very short in F1 and if he beats Hulk then people will quickly forget about his previous beating and he'll have a better chance at the top teams again, as you've said.

Mark Webber experienced it with Vettel, the fact the Webber wasn't backed in the 2010 title run in tells you a lot about how Red Bull operate. Yes it ended out well for Red Bull but it doesn't change the decision and who they wanted to win the title and break records. The same at Mercedes, Mercedes would massively prefer Hamilton to win the title over Bottas and why wouldn't they. Its more records and marketing dream which ultimately sells more cars.

2014, Riccairdo was so much quicker it was not relevant. I don't think Ricciardo was heavily beaten at all last year either. He put in a good account of himself, there was very little between them when both had fully functioning cars. No doubt, Verstappen edges him on talent but they both won 2 races each. Although if Verstappen was a bit less error prone that could have been 4-0

The only thing Mark Webber experienced at Red Bull was him not being good enough. If he hadn't binned it in Korea then he'd have taken the WDC title that year, but the fact he didn't was down to him and him alone. And he qualified atrociously in Abu Dhabi to give himself even more of a mountain to climb. Red Bull gave him everything he needed for the title but Webber didn't deliver.

I don't really see evidence that Mercedes would rather Hamilton win, it's just that he's the most obvious candidate to back as he's a proven winner and if he's given the tools he'll deliver. Bit like the situation at Ferrari today - they'll back Vettel because he's shown he can do it, but they'll still pop the champagne if Leclerc gets it instead. And Ricciardo is extremely marketable, so I can't see any logic in Red Bull not wanting him to do well, either. He just wasn't as good as Max.

Ricciardo was pretty comprehensively beaten IMO. Max made a number of mistakes but in terms of pace and ability it's obvious who was the better driver. If Max hadn't been so impetuous then the gap would have been even bigger - as you say, it could/should have been 4 wins for Max and Ricciardo can probably count his blessings that Max didn't maximise his chances, but at the end of the day Max can work on his mistakes but it's less likely that Ricciardo can find extra speed.

Having said that, Ricciardo's a pretty competent driver, it's just unfortunate for him that he had someone like Max partner him just when it looked like the world was his at Red Bull. But the way things turned out had nothing to do with who Red Bull preferred, just down to which driver performed better.

I think you are giving zero consideration of how circumstances effect driver performance or even effort to say Max thumped Dan.

Dan has been promised a championship winning car for 5 years, and for 5 years Red Bull have not delivered.
Dan was 20 points behind after 6 races with 2 wins to each or Ham, Vettel and Dan.
Red Bull publicly announced they were building the team around Max and then show favouritism by saying each driver was equal to blame in Baku, when most experts thought Max was in the wrong.
Followed up by 8 or so engine retirements, and at other times, he was just nursing the engine home each race when he wasn’t in a good position (so that engine would not jeopardise the next race), Dan could not and did not show anything like what he is capable of in 2018.
Apart from that he beat max in 2016 and 2017 in the driver standings.

Have you ever been overlooked for a promotion at work? Or seen someone around you getting favouritism, whether it be friends earning more, a guy that gets all the girls etc.
We are all human, and to not even factor in the politics going on at Red Bull is very short sighted imho.

My point is that Max looks quicker than Ricciardo. Experience will eventually iron out mistakes and that will likely make him unassailable (for Ricciardo). Ricciardo's still good, but I think it's hard to conclude anything other than that Verstappen's better

Randine wrote:

Randine wrote:

Zoue wrote:

Johnson wrote:

Zoue wrote: Mark Webber experienced it with Vettel, the fact the Webber wasn't backed in the 2010 title run in tells you a lot about how Red Bull operate. Yes it ended out well for Red Bull but it doesn't change the decision and who they wanted to win the title and break records. The same at Mercedes, Mercedes would massively prefer Hamilton to win the title over Bottas and why wouldn't they. Its more records and marketing dream which ultimately sells more cars.

2014, Riccairdo was so much quicker it was not relevant. I don't think Ricciardo was heavily beaten at all last year either. He put in a good account of himself, there was very little between them when both had fully functioning cars. No doubt, Verstappen edges him on talent but they both won 2 races each. Although if Verstappen was a bit less error prone that could have been 4-0

The only thing Mark Webber experienced at Red Bull was him not being good enough. If he hadn't binned it in Korea then he'd have taken the WDC title that year, but the fact he didn't was down to him and him alone. And he qualified atrociously in Abu Dhabi to give himself even more of a mountain to climb. Red Bull gave him everything he needed for the title but Webber didn't deliver.

I don't really see evidence that Mercedes would rather Hamilton win, it's just that he's the most obvious candidate to back as he's a proven winner and if he's given the tools he'll deliver. Bit like the situation at Ferrari today - they'll back Vettel because he's shown he can do it, but they'll still pop the champagne if Leclerc gets it instead. And Ricciardo is extremely marketable, so I can't see any logic in Red Bull not wanting him to do well, either. He just wasn't as good as Max.

Ricciardo was pretty comprehensively beaten IMO. Max made a number of mistakes but in terms of pace and ability it's obvious who was the better driver. If Max hadn't been so impetuous then the gap would have been even bigger - as you say, it could/should have been 4 wins for Max and Ricciardo can probably count his blessings that Max didn't maximise his chances, but at the end of the day Max can work on his mistakes but it's less likely that Ricciardo can find extra speed.

Having said that, Ricciardo's a pretty competent driver, it's just unfortunate for him that he had someone like Max partner him just when it looked like the world was his at Red Bull. But the way things turned out had nothing to do with who Red Bull preferred, just down to which driver performed better.

I think you are giving zero consideration of how circumstances effect driver performance or even effort to say Max thumped Dan.

Dan has been promised a championship winning car for 5 years, and for 5 years Red Bull have not delivered.
Dan was 20 points behind after 6 races with 2 wins to each or Ham, Vettel and Dan.
Red Bull publicly announced they were building the team around Max and then show favouritism by saying each driver was equal to blame in Baku, when most experts thought Max was in the wrong.
Followed up by 8 or so engine retirements, and at other times, he was just nursing the engine home each race when he wasn’t in a good position (so that engine would not jeopardise the next race), Dan could not and did not show anything like what he is capable of in 2018.
Apart from that he beat max in 2016 and 2017 in the driver standings.

Have you ever been overlooked for a promotion at work? Or seen someone around you getting favouritism, whether it be friends earning more, a guy that gets all the girls etc.
We are all human, and to not even factor in the politics going on at Red Bull is very short sighted imho.

My point is that Max looks quicker than Ricciardo. Experience will eventually iron out mistakes and that will likely make him unassailable (for Ricciardo). Ricciardo's still good, but I think it's hard to conclude anything other than that Verstappen's better

Max is in his 5th year in F1.
He makes far too many mistakes.
His approach is to win each races at all costs.

He even admitted that during testing he had to take it seriously without Ricciardo being there.

I think that you are under estimating Dan.
For someone that is being hailed as the next Senna, Max has zero pole positions while Dan has 3 all while Max was his partner.

Max drives on the edge, and as a result is quick, but he still doesn’t know his limits.
I regard him as being closer to Maldonado than Senna.
I have serious doubt over his ability to fight for a close championship without imploding.

Randine wrote:
Max is in his 5th year in F1.
He makes far too many mistakes.
His approach is to win each races at all costs.

He even admitted that during testing he had to take it seriously without Ricciardo being there.

I think that you are under estimating Dan.
For someone that is being hailed as the next Senna, Max has zero pole positions while Dan has 3 all while Max was his partner.

Max drives on the edge, and as a result is quick, but he still doesn’t know his limits.
I regard him as being closer to Maldonado than Senna.
I have serious doubt over his ability to fight for a close championship without imploding.

dizlexik wrote:I don't think Red Bull is going to win WDC this season anyway. He joined Renault to win WDC not to just score more podiums. It might take some time, but Renault has as much money as Red Bull.

dizlexik wrote:I don't think Red Bull is going to win WDC this season anyway. He joined Renault to win WDC not to just score more podiums. It might take some time, but Renault has as much money as Red Bull.

dizlexik wrote:I don't think Red Bull is going to win WDC this season anyway. He joined Renault to win WDC not to just score more podiums. It might take some time, but Renault has as much money as Red Bull.

Zoue wrote:

dizlexik wrote:I don't think Red Bull is going to win WDC this season anyway. He joined Renault to win WDC not to just score more podiums. It might take some time, but Renault has as much money as Red Bull.

I'm not so sure about that. Wasn't one of the problems that Renault haven't invested nearly as much in their PU program as the other manufacturers, and isn't it rumoured that Honda are writing a blank check in order to succeed with theirs?

froze wrote:Another thing is, what are the implications if Ricciardo gets beaten by Hulkenberg in Renault? Being the higher paid star driver of the team, Ricciardo actually has some pressure to perform well, because if Hulk is able to match him or better, then what will justify his star status in the team in the long run, or how might it affect other teams perceptions of him, in case he would need to look for an exit from Renault, if they can't manage to break into the top 3?

Jezza13 wrote:

froze wrote:Another thing is, what are the implications if Ricciardo gets beaten by Hulkenberg in Renault? Being the higher paid star driver of the team, Ricciardo actually has some pressure to perform well, because if Hulk is able to match him or better, then what will justify his star status in the team in the long run, or how might it affect other teams perceptions of him, in case he would need to look for an exit from Renault, if they can't manage to break into the top 3?

I'd say certainly the end of any hope WC hope & probably the end of a F1 career.

Zoue wrote:

Jezza13 wrote:

froze wrote:Another thing is, what are the implications if Ricciardo gets beaten by Hulkenberg in Renault? Being the higher paid star driver of the team, Ricciardo actually has some pressure to perform well, because if Hulk is able to match him or better, then what will justify his star status in the team in the long run, or how might it affect other teams perceptions of him, in case he would need to look for an exit from Renault, if they can't manage to break into the top 3?

I'd say certainly the end of any hope WC hope & probably the end of a F1 career.

I'd agree with the former, but not with the latter. The top teams would lose interest but he's proven he's plenty capable and can still snatch a win or two given half a chance. That's better than most on the grid

KingVoid wrote:Let’s not over-exaggerate. Ricciardo is a proven race winner and will have opportunities in F1 for at least the next decade, unless he voluntarily decides to retire early.

With that said, his chances at a WDC will effectively be over if Hulkenberg beats him.

froze wrote:Another thing is, what are the implications if Ricciardo gets beaten by Hulkenberg in Renault? Being the higher paid star driver of the team, Ricciardo actually has some pressure to perform well, because if Hulk is able to match him or better, then what will justify his star status in the team in the long run, or how might it affect other teams perceptions of him, in case he would need to look for an exit from Renault, if they can't manage to break into the top 3?

MistaVega23 wrote:

KingVoid wrote:Let’s not over-exaggerate. Ricciardo is a proven race winner and will have opportunities in F1 for at least the next decade, unless he voluntarily decides to retire early.

With that said, his chances at a WDC will effectively be over if Hulkenberg beats him.

And if that's the case, then what next for Hulkenberg? I'd love to see him in a top car even if it's just for one season. I don't see Renault providing that for a while...

KingVoid wrote:

MistaVega23 wrote:

KingVoid wrote:Let’s not over-exaggerate. Ricciardo is a proven race winner and will have opportunities in F1 for at least the next decade, unless he voluntarily decides to retire early.

With that said, his chances at a WDC will effectively be over if Hulkenberg beats him.

And if that's the case, then what next for Hulkenberg? I'd love to see him in a top car even if it's just for one season. I don't see Renault providing that for a while...

Hulkenberg and Perez are two drivers who I think desperately deserve at least one season in a top car before they retire.

KingVoid wrote:

MistaVega23 wrote:

KingVoid wrote:Let’s not over-exaggerate. Ricciardo is a proven race winner and will have opportunities in F1 for at least the next decade, unless he voluntarily decides to retire early.

With that said, his chances at a WDC will effectively be over if Hulkenberg beats him.

And if that's the case, then what next for Hulkenberg? I'd love to see him in a top car even if it's just for one season. I don't see Renault providing that for a while...

Hulkenberg and Perez are two drivers who I think desperately deserve at least one season in a top car before they retire.

mikeyg123 wrote:

KingVoid wrote:

MistaVega23 wrote:

KingVoid wrote:Let’s not over-exaggerate. Ricciardo is a proven race winner and will have opportunities in F1 for at least the next decade, unless he voluntarily decides to retire early.

With that said, his chances at a WDC will effectively be over if Hulkenberg beats him.

And if that's the case, then what next for Hulkenberg? I'd love to see him in a top car even if it's just for one season. I don't see Renault providing that for a while...

Hulkenberg and Perez are two drivers who I think desperately deserve at least one season in a top car before they retire.

I think the days of a driver working there way up the grid are gone. To get a chance in a top team you have to be either a junior driver or join a midfield team that comes good.

pokerman wrote:

dizlexik wrote:I don't think Red Bull is going to win WDC this season anyway. He joined Renault to win WDC not to just score more podiums. It might take some time, but Renault has as much money as Red Bull.

Ricciardo won 2 races last year, even race wins have no value?

As for the money side, no the Renault F1 team do not have as much money as Red Bull F1, that's why Renault are campaigning so hard for a budget cap starting in 2021, without the budget cap they are not winning anything anytime soon.

dizlexik wrote:

pokerman wrote:

dizlexik wrote:I don't think Red Bull is going to win WDC this season anyway. He joined Renault to win WDC not to just score more podiums. It might take some time, but Renault has as much money as Red Bull.

Ricciardo won 2 races last year, even race wins have no value?

As for the money side, no the Renault F1 team do not have as much money as Red Bull F1, that's why Renault are campaigning so hard for a budget cap starting in 2021, without the budget cap they are not winning anything anytime soon.

You and others might have point about budget, but Riccardo wants to win WDC. Hamilton took giant risk when he had enough of few race wins a year and it paid off. Maybe Daniel won't stay at Renault but it was good decision. He needs team that is fully behind him to win the title. That wasn't true when he was at Red Bull, so he freed himself from Red Bull as soon as he could.

KingVoid wrote:Let’s not over-exaggerate. Ricciardo is a proven race winner and will have opportunities in F1 for at least the next decade, unless he voluntarily decides to retire early.

With that said, his chances at a WDC will effectively be over if Hulkenberg beats him.

dizlexik wrote:

pokerman wrote:

dizlexik wrote:I don't think Red Bull is going to win WDC this season anyway. He joined Renault to win WDC not to just score more podiums. It might take some time, but Renault has as much money as Red Bull.

Ricciardo won 2 races last year, even race wins have no value?

As for the money side, no the Renault F1 team do not have as much money as Red Bull F1, that's why Renault are campaigning so hard for a budget cap starting in 2021, without the budget cap they are not winning anything anytime soon.

You and others might have point about budget, but Riccardo wants to win WDC. Hamilton took giant risk when he had enough of few race wins a year and it paid off. Maybe Daniel won't stay at Renault but it was good decision. He needs team that is fully behind him to win the title. That wasn't true when he was at Red Bull, so he freed himself from Red Bull as soon as he could.

Zoue wrote:

dizlexik wrote:

pokerman wrote:

dizlexik wrote:I don't think Red Bull is going to win WDC this season anyway. He joined Renault to win WDC not to just score more podiums. It might take some time, but Renault has as much money as Red Bull.

Ricciardo won 2 races last year, even race wins have no value?

As for the money side, no the Renault F1 team do not have as much money as Red Bull F1, that's why Renault are campaigning so hard for a budget cap starting in 2021, without the budget cap they are not winning anything anytime soon.

You and others might have point about budget, but Riccardo wants to win WDC. Hamilton took giant risk when he had enough of few race wins a year and it paid off. Maybe Daniel won't stay at Renault but it was good decision. He needs team that is fully behind him to win the title. That wasn't true when he was at Red Bull, so he freed himself from Red Bull as soon as he could.

BIB: what does that even mean? He had everything he needed from Red Bull. By being fully behind him, do you mean favoring him? Because I don't see that he was disadvantaged in any way.

I think moving was the right thing for him if he has future title aspirations, BTW. But that's because I don't think he'll beat Max, not because Red Bull won't give him what he needs. Moving gives him a better chance of keeping his stock high

dizlexik wrote:

Zoue wrote:

dizlexik wrote:

pokerman wrote:

dizlexik wrote:I don't think Red Bull is going to win WDC this season anyway. He joined Renault to win WDC not to just score more podiums. It might take some time, but Renault has as much money as Red Bull.

Ricciardo won 2 races last year, even race wins have no value?

As for the money side, no the Renault F1 team do not have as much money as Red Bull F1, that's why Renault are campaigning so hard for a budget cap starting in 2021, without the budget cap they are not winning anything anytime soon.

You and others might have point about budget, but Riccardo wants to win WDC. Hamilton took giant risk when he had enough of few race wins a year and it paid off. Maybe Daniel won't stay at Renault but it was good decision. He needs team that is fully behind him to win the title. That wasn't true when he was at Red Bull, so he freed himself from Red Bull as soon as he could.

BIB: what does that even mean? He had everything he needed from Red Bull. By being fully behind him, do you mean favoring him? Because I don't see that he was disadvantaged in any way.

I think moving was the right thing for him if he has future title aspirations, BTW. But that's because I don't think he'll beat Max, not because Red Bull won't give him what he needs. Moving gives him a better chance of keeping his stock high

He doesn't need to race Verstappen.

Johnson wrote:

KingVoid wrote:Let’s not over-exaggerate. Ricciardo is a proven race winner and will have opportunities in F1 for at least the next decade, unless he voluntarily decides to retire early.

With that said, his chances at a WDC will effectively be over if Hulkenberg beats him.

At least the next decade? He is 30 years old in July. He has 1 big contract left in him, at which point he wil be turning 32. If Ferrari or Mercedes don't come calling at that point I don't see it ever happening. There are too many up and coming young drivers.

trento wrote:With the huge gap to Hulkenberg, could Ricciardo be fired?

Zoue wrote:

trento wrote:With the huge gap to Hulkenberg, could Ricciardo be fired?

what, from Free Practice times?