2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Altair
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2017 4:17 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Altair »

ReservoirDog wrote:I will make a bold prediction: Red Bull will not win a race this year.
That's not bold.

Bold is saying Ferrari won't win a race this year.

sandman1347
Posts: 6977
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 7:55 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by sandman1347 »

I'm predicting Leclerc to win in Baku. I think the track should really suit Ferrari with that third sector and Charles has done well there in junior categories. Part of the prediction is wishful thinking. If Ferrari cannot get their act together within the next couple of races I don't think we'll see them put up a genuine title challenge this year.

User avatar
Black_Flag_11
Posts: 8027
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 1:05 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Black_Flag_11 »

sandman1347 wrote:I'm predicting Leclerc to win in Baku. I think the track should really suit Ferrari with that third sector and Charles has done well there in junior categories. Part of the prediction is wishful thinking. If Ferrari cannot get their act together within the next couple of races I don't think we'll see them put up a genuine title challenge this year.
I'm considering some money on Leclerc for Baku myself. He's looked mega there the last 2 years and wouldn't surprise me if Ferrari bounced back again next time out. I'll be rooting for him anyway after the Bahrain misfortune.

This is going to be a very up and down season between Mercedes and Ferrari I think.

BMWSauber84
Posts: 704
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 1:19 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by BMWSauber84 »

Altair wrote:
ReservoirDog wrote:I will make a bold prediction: Red Bull will not win a race this year.
That's not bold.

Bold is saying Ferrari won't win a race this year.


I'd say it's fairly bold seeing as Reb Bull have only had one winless season since 2009 (2015) and they have Verstappen in the team. They'll nab wins.

F1 Racer
Posts: 827
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2018 12:53 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by F1 Racer »

BMWSauber84 wrote:
Altair wrote:
ReservoirDog wrote:I will make a bold prediction: Red Bull will not win a race this year.
That's not bold.

Bold is saying Ferrari won't win a race this year.


I'd say it's fairly bold seeing as Reb Bull have only had one winless season since 2009 (2015) and they have Verstappen in the team. They'll nab wins.
Yeah, I can see Red Bull nabbing a win somewhere. Red Bull performance-wise in 2019 are like Benetton in 1992 and 1993, and they managed a win in each of those seasons with only 16 races to do so in each of those years compared to 21 now. Max is their Schumacher and Gasly is their Patrese/Brundle, so Gasly should be able to grab a podium or two if he gets the whole season.

ReservoirDog
Posts: 1899
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 11:31 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by ReservoirDog »

Altair wrote:
ReservoirDog wrote:I will make a bold prediction: Red Bull will not win a race this year.
That's not bold.

Bold is saying Ferrari won't win a race this year.
Red Bull tends to get 3 or 4 wins every season. Mostly due to specific tracks suiting. I think it's bold because I don't expect RBR to be the best car at any circuit. Whenever I see the car, I get the feeling it's chassis is subpar (compared to Merc/Ferrari).

User avatar
Mort Canard
Posts: 1484
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 12:58 am
Location: Kansas

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Mort Canard »

ReservoirDog wrote:
Altair wrote:
ReservoirDog wrote:I will make a bold prediction: Red Bull will not win a race this year.
That's not bold.

Bold is saying Ferrari won't win a race this year.
Red Bull tends to get 3 or 4 wins every season. Mostly due to specific tracks suiting. I think it's bold because I don't expect RBR to be the best car at any circuit. Whenever I see the car, I get the feeling it's chassis is subpar (compared to Merc/Ferrari).
Interesting, since a lot of folks have thought that Red Bull had the best or near best chassis for several seasons and that they were hampered by a low power and unreliable P/U.

Did they screw up the best chassis with the new rules changes or did Merc and Ferrari just get better???
Mission WinLater

User avatar
Exediron
Posts: 8069
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 3:53 am
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Exediron »

Mort Canard wrote:Interesting, since a lot of folks have thought that Red Bull had the best or near best chassis for several seasons and that they were hampered by a low power and unreliable P/U.

Did they screw up the best chassis with the new rules changes or did Merc and Ferrari just get better???
If you want to apply the same logic we McLaren fans have been getting thrown at us, they never had the best chassis and were just lying about it to make themselves look better at the expense of their PU supplier.
PICK 10 COMPETITION (6 wins, 18 podiums): 3rd in 2016
TOP THREE CHAMPIONSHIP (No Limit Excedrin Racing): Champions in 2015 & 2018 | 2nd in 2017 & 2019
AUTOSPORT GP PREDICTOR: 2017 USA & P-F1 Champion

Zoue
Posts: 25158
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Zoue »

Mort Canard wrote:
ReservoirDog wrote:
Altair wrote:
ReservoirDog wrote:I will make a bold prediction: Red Bull will not win a race this year.
That's not bold.

Bold is saying Ferrari won't win a race this year.
Red Bull tends to get 3 or 4 wins every season. Mostly due to specific tracks suiting. I think it's bold because I don't expect RBR to be the best car at any circuit. Whenever I see the car, I get the feeling it's chassis is subpar (compared to Merc/Ferrari).
Interesting, since a lot of folks have thought that Red Bull had the best or near best chassis for several seasons and that they were hampered by a low power and unreliable P/U.

Did they screw up the best chassis with the new rules changes or did Merc and Ferrari just get better???
If you compare China this year with last, only Mercedes of the top teams improved their time. Ferrari took the biggest step backwards, dropping half a second. But this may be explained by the rumour that they are having to turn things down due to reliability concerns - certainly in Bahrain they posted similar times to last year. The Ferrari looks less planted than the Merc, though.

Verstappen's Red Bull dropped 3 tenths on last year, which could be down to the PU. But when we look at Toro Rosso, they gained nearly half a second, and they haven't changed PU, while the Renault team also have dropped half a second on last year. This would suggest that Red Bull (and Renault) are more likely losing on the chassis side, rather than the PU. It's too small a sample to be scientific but at first glance it doesn't look like Red Bull have made any steps forward with this year's package, and in fact look to have lost some ground. Mercerdes are the only ones who look to have made definite improvements

User avatar
Johnson
Posts: 1435
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 1:20 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Johnson »

ReservoirDog wrote:
Altair wrote:
ReservoirDog wrote:I will make a bold prediction: Red Bull will not win a race this year.
That's not bold.

Bold is saying Ferrari won't win a race this year.
Red Bull tends to get 3 or 4 wins every season. Mostly due to specific tracks suiting. I think it's bold because I don't expect RBR to be the best car at any circuit. Whenever I see the car, I get the feeling it's chassis is subpar (compared to Merc/Ferrari).
Red Bull are the development kings though, they started 2016 and 2017 nowhere but by the end were racing for wins.

User avatar
Exediron
Posts: 8069
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 3:53 am
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Exediron »

Johnson wrote:
ReservoirDog wrote:
Altair wrote:
ReservoirDog wrote:I will make a bold prediction: Red Bull will not win a race this year.
That's not bold.

Bold is saying Ferrari won't win a race this year.
Red Bull tends to get 3 or 4 wins every season. Mostly due to specific tracks suiting. I think it's bold because I don't expect RBR to be the best car at any circuit. Whenever I see the car, I get the feeling it's chassis is subpar (compared to Merc/Ferrari).
Red Bull are the development kings though, they started 2016 and 2017 nowhere but by the end were racing for wins.
But is that really an illusion caused by the fact that they keep developing their car to the end every year, causing a repeating cycle where they're good at the end but start the next year on the back foot?
PICK 10 COMPETITION (6 wins, 18 podiums): 3rd in 2016
TOP THREE CHAMPIONSHIP (No Limit Excedrin Racing): Champions in 2015 & 2018 | 2nd in 2017 & 2019
AUTOSPORT GP PREDICTOR: 2017 USA & P-F1 Champion

pokerman
Posts: 35103
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by pokerman »

j man wrote:
Zoue wrote:
j man wrote:
Johnson wrote:It seems Ferrari have reliability issues, new CE in both cars this weekend of an older spec. The mystery of no pace in Australia before switching the engines up a Leclercs car failing. Now possibly turned back down?

This is th first time in 2019 I feel Mercedes look the best package for the titles though.
:thumbup:

I'm getting the impression that Ferrari have the fastest car but they're unable to use it to its full potential, making the Mercedes the best car overall. It's a bit reminiscent of 2005.
I agree with you that if Ferrari have indeed turned their PU down then they do have the fastest car but cannot use it to its fullest potential. But since they are still claimed to be fastest by some margin on the straights, even while "holding back," this would suggest that the best car is in fact the Mercedes, while Ferrari look to have the best PU. But for Mercedes to be so much quicker in the twisty bits is quite impressive - what could they do with a Ferrari PU in the back? :twisted:
I was also wondering after Bahrain if Ferrari's reported power advantage is primarily in their "qualifying" mode and that in race pace it's pretty close between them. Certainly Hamilton's race pace that day was not too shabby.
Yeah In qualifying they are able to use more power than Mercedes but in the race itself the power is quite even.
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)

pokerman
Posts: 35103
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by pokerman »

Exediron wrote:
Mort Canard wrote:Interesting, since a lot of folks have thought that Red Bull had the best or near best chassis for several seasons and that they were hampered by a low power and unreliable P/U.

Did they screw up the best chassis with the new rules changes or did Merc and Ferrari just get better???
If you want to apply the same logic we McLaren fans have been getting thrown at us, they never had the best chassis and were just lying about it to make themselves look better at the expense of their PU supplier.
Well unlike McLaren they were able to win many races with scores of podiums thrown in. :)
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)

pokerman
Posts: 35103
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by pokerman »

So quite straight forward again Mercedes > Ferrari > Red Bull, let's use the WDC scoring system so we have thus far:-

1. Mercedes 68
2. Ferrari 58
3. Red Bull 48
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)

User avatar
Mort Canard
Posts: 1484
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 12:58 am
Location: Kansas

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Mort Canard »

Zoue wrote:
Mort Canard wrote: Interesting, since a lot of folks have thought that Red Bull had the best or near best chassis for several seasons and that they were hampered by a low power and unreliable P/U.

Did they screw up the best chassis with the new rules changes or did Merc and Ferrari just get better???
If you compare China this year with last, only Mercedes of the top teams improved their time. Ferrari took the biggest step backwards, dropping half a second. But this may be explained by the rumour that they are having to turn things down due to reliability concerns - certainly in Bahrain they posted similar times to last year. The Ferrari looks less planted than the Merc, though.

Verstappen's Red Bull dropped 3 tenths on last year, which could be down to the PU. But when we look at Toro Rosso, they gained nearly half a second, and they haven't changed PU, while the Renault team also have dropped half a second on last year. This would suggest that Red Bull (and Renault) are more likely losing on the chassis side, rather than the PU. It's too small a sample to be scientific but at first glance it doesn't look like Red Bull have made any steps forward with this year's package, and in fact look to have lost some ground. Mercerdes are the only ones who look to have made definite improvements
Very interesting! Thanks for that! :thumbup:
Mission WinLater

F1_Ernie
Posts: 3686
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 8:52 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by F1_Ernie »

Mark Hughes comparing Ferrari and Mercedes so far.

https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/opin ... -delivered
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2016: 24th place
2017: 4th place
2018: 12th place

Wins: Spain 2016, Canada 2017, Malaysia 2017
Podiums: 2nd Germany 2016, 3rd Mexico 2016, 3rd China 2018, 3rd Japan 2018, 2nd Mexico 2018

User avatar
tootsie323
Posts: 3143
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 5:52 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by tootsie323 »

F1_Ernie wrote:Mark Hughes comparing Ferrari and Mercedes so far.

https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/opin ... -delivered
Interesting. What I take from this is that Ferrari think that they have the fastest car but have not been able to 'unlock' it - and there's no guarantee that they will. I guess it would be a bit like Usain Bolt being the fastest sprinter but his team haven't figured out how - or whether - they can remove his hobnail boots and replace them with running shoes.
Where I'm going, I don't need roads

ReservoirDog
Posts: 1899
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 11:31 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by ReservoirDog »

tootsie323 wrote:
F1_Ernie wrote:Mark Hughes comparing Ferrari and Mercedes so far.

https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/opin ... -delivered
Interesting. What I take from this is that Ferrari think that they have the fastest car but have not been able to 'unlock' it - and there's no guarantee that they will. I guess it would be a bit like Usain Bolt being the fastest sprinter but his team haven't figured out how - or whether - they can remove his hobnail boots and replace them with running shoes.
Merc tamed their diva in 2017. Ferrari should also be able to.

Zoue
Posts: 25158
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Zoue »

ReservoirDog wrote:
tootsie323 wrote:
F1_Ernie wrote:Mark Hughes comparing Ferrari and Mercedes so far.

https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/opin ... -delivered
Interesting. What I take from this is that Ferrari think that they have the fastest car but have not been able to 'unlock' it - and there's no guarantee that they will. I guess it would be a bit like Usain Bolt being the fastest sprinter but his team haven't figured out how - or whether - they can remove his hobnail boots and replace them with running shoes.
Merc tamed their diva in 2017. Ferrari should also be able to.
Unless their issues are identical, there's no correlation between the two

User avatar
Covalent
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:07 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Covalent »

Wow that was a close one pace-wise between Merc, Ferrari and Red Bull!

JN23
Posts: 2244
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:14 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by JN23 »

I'd score them equal in qualifying this weekend, Merc in the race so Merc overall.

Zoue
Posts: 25158
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Zoue »

JN23 wrote:I'd score them equal in qualifying this weekend, Merc in the race so Merc overall.
yeah I think I'd be onboard with that

F1_Ernie
Posts: 3686
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 8:52 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by F1_Ernie »

https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/repo ... rix-report

Interesting read regarding qualifying.
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2016: 24th place
2017: 4th place
2018: 12th place

Wins: Spain 2016, Canada 2017, Malaysia 2017
Podiums: 2nd Germany 2016, 3rd Mexico 2016, 3rd China 2018, 3rd Japan 2018, 2nd Mexico 2018

pokerman
Posts: 35103
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by pokerman »

F1_Ernie wrote:https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/repo ... rix-report

Interesting read regarding qualifying.
I think that some people need to read that?
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)

F1_Ernie
Posts: 3686
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 8:52 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by F1_Ernie »

pokerman wrote:
F1_Ernie wrote:https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/repo ... rix-report

Interesting read regarding qualifying.
I think that some people need to read that?
Definitely, some very good information.
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2016: 24th place
2017: 4th place
2018: 12th place

Wins: Spain 2016, Canada 2017, Malaysia 2017
Podiums: 2nd Germany 2016, 3rd Mexico 2016, 3rd China 2018, 3rd Japan 2018, 2nd Mexico 2018

Zoue
Posts: 25158
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Zoue »

F1_Ernie wrote:
pokerman wrote:
F1_Ernie wrote:https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/repo ... rix-report

Interesting read regarding qualifying.
I think that some people need to read that?
Definitely, some very good information.
Yeah, what struck me was that the entire piece was pretty much all about the tyres and how they affected the race. It's getting absolutely ridiculous now and it seems they're going back to the really bad old days where they have an operating window that's so narrow as to be virtually invisible.

It's a farce. This is what F1's become now?

User avatar
Covalent
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:07 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Covalent »

pokerman wrote:
F1_Ernie wrote:https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/repo ... rix-report

Interesting read regarding qualifying.
I think that some people need to read that?
I think everyone should read it, well written and informative.

User avatar
Covalent
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:07 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Covalent »

Zoue wrote:
F1_Ernie wrote:
pokerman wrote:
F1_Ernie wrote:https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/repo ... rix-report

Interesting read regarding qualifying.
I think that some people need to read that?
Definitely, some very good information.
Yeah, what struck me was that the entire piece was pretty much all about the tyres and how they affected the race. It's getting absolutely ridiculous now and it seems they're going back to the really bad old days where they have an operating window that's so narrow as to be virtually invisible.

It's a farce. This is what F1's become now?
Yes I agree with this. I thought they were supposed to have a wider operating window this year?

pokerman
Posts: 35103
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by pokerman »

Covalent wrote:
Zoue wrote:
F1_Ernie wrote:
pokerman wrote:
F1_Ernie wrote:https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/repo ... rix-report

Interesting read regarding qualifying.
I think that some people need to read that?
Definitely, some very good information.
Yeah, what struck me was that the entire piece was pretty much all about the tyres and how they affected the race. It's getting absolutely ridiculous now and it seems they're going back to the really bad old days where they have an operating window that's so narrow as to be virtually invisible.

It's a farce. This is what F1's become now?
Yes I agree with this. I thought they were supposed to have a wider operating window this year?
It shows basically how Ferrari (Leclerc) dropped the ball, his crash in Q2 further delayed the qualifying session which pushed the temperatures lower bringing Mercedes more into the game at the expense of Vettel in Q3.
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)

Zoue
Posts: 25158
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Zoue »

pokerman wrote:
Covalent wrote:
Zoue wrote:
F1_Ernie wrote:
pokerman wrote:I think that some people need to read that?
Definitely, some very good information.
Yeah, what struck me was that the entire piece was pretty much all about the tyres and how they affected the race. It's getting absolutely ridiculous now and it seems they're going back to the really bad old days where they have an operating window that's so narrow as to be virtually invisible.

It's a farce. This is what F1's become now?
Yes I agree with this. I thought they were supposed to have a wider operating window this year?
It shows basically how Ferrari (Leclerc) dropped the ball, his crash in Q2 further delayed the qualifying session which pushed the temperatures lower bringing Mercedes more into the game at the expense of Vettel in Q3.
it happened in the race with Ferrari, Red Bull etc too

pokerman
Posts: 35103
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by pokerman »

This was very hard to judge, Ferrari (Leclerc) had the fastest car throughout the weekend up to Leclerc crashing in Q2 which put him out of the game and delayed qualifying were the falling temperatures disadvantaged Vettel in respect to the Mercedes drivers in Q3.

I can't help feeling that without that happening Leclerc might well have been on pole with Vettel splitting the Mercs with Bottas possible starting 4th then the race itself takes on a different complexion.

Autosport are running an article were it says possibly 6 drivers could have won the race if things had played out slightly differently, unfortunately it's behind a paywall.

I can't go along with the Mercedes being the fastest car with Ferrari (Leclerc) dropping the ball so I'm going to call it even with Red Bull third, so:-

1. Mercedes 93
2. Ferrari 83
3. Red Bull 63
Last edited by pokerman on Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)

pokerman
Posts: 35103
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by pokerman »

Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Covalent wrote:
Zoue wrote:
F1_Ernie wrote: Definitely, some very good information.
Yeah, what struck me was that the entire piece was pretty much all about the tyres and how they affected the race. It's getting absolutely ridiculous now and it seems they're going back to the really bad old days where they have an operating window that's so narrow as to be virtually invisible.

It's a farce. This is what F1's become now?
Yes I agree with this. I thought they were supposed to have a wider operating window this year?
It shows basically how Ferrari (Leclerc) dropped the ball, his crash in Q2 further delayed the qualifying session which pushed the temperatures lower bringing Mercedes more into the game at the expense of Vettel in Q3.
it happened in the race with Ferrari, Red Bull etc too
Vettel had a problem on the softs which Leclerc may not have had, we saw Vettel have problems with tyres in Australia which didn't affect Leclerc.
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)

Rockie
Posts: 2155
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 11:13 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Rockie »

pokerman wrote: Vettel had a problem on the softs which Leclerc may not have had, we saw Vettel have problems with tyres in Australia which didn't affect Leclerc.
Leclerc could not make the softs work later on in the race or could he keep the mediums working as long as Gasly did.

Mercedes controlled their pace and though Mark Hughes I respect him as an F1 journo what is in that article is no different from what armchair pundits have been saying since sat as well, there is no technical info behind it.

He totally neglects Mercedes race pace in the article, had Leclerc started on pole he wont have had the race pace or the tyre life to fight Mercedes.

Vettel didnt have a tyre problem in Australia rather a silly strategy which made him run out of tyres.

User avatar
Black_Flag_11
Posts: 8027
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 1:05 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Black_Flag_11 »

pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Covalent wrote: Yes I agree with this. I thought they were supposed to have a wider operating window this year?
It shows basically how Ferrari (Leclerc) dropped the ball, his crash in Q2 further delayed the qualifying session which pushed the temperatures lower bringing Mercedes more into the game at the expense of Vettel in Q3.
it happened in the race with Ferrari, Red Bull etc too
Vettel had a problem on the softs which Leclerc may not have had, we saw Vettel have problems with tyres in Australia which didn't affect Leclerc.
I think he clearly did have a problem with the softs in the race. Once he pit for softs he started dropping time to Verstappen, on a fresh set of supposedly faster tyres, Ferrari just couldn't seem to make them work on Sunday.

mikeyg123
Posts: 17660
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by mikeyg123 »

Black_Flag_11 wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Covalent wrote: Yes I agree with this. I thought they were supposed to have a wider operating window this year?
It shows basically how Ferrari (Leclerc) dropped the ball, his crash in Q2 further delayed the qualifying session which pushed the temperatures lower bringing Mercedes more into the game at the expense of Vettel in Q3.
it happened in the race with Ferrari, Red Bull etc too
Vettel had a problem on the softs which Leclerc may not have had, we saw Vettel have problems with tyres in Australia which didn't affect Leclerc.
I think he clearly did have a problem with the softs in the race. Once he pit for softs he started dropping time to Verstappen, on a fresh set of supposedly faster tyres, Ferrari just couldn't seem to make them work on Sunday.
Ferrari told him not to push

Zoue
Posts: 25158
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Zoue »

mikeyg123 wrote:
Black_Flag_11 wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:It shows basically how Ferrari (Leclerc) dropped the ball, his crash in Q2 further delayed the qualifying session which pushed the temperatures lower bringing Mercedes more into the game at the expense of Vettel in Q3.
it happened in the race with Ferrari, Red Bull etc too
Vettel had a problem on the softs which Leclerc may not have had, we saw Vettel have problems with tyres in Australia which didn't affect Leclerc.
I think he clearly did have a problem with the softs in the race. Once he pit for softs he started dropping time to Verstappen, on a fresh set of supposedly faster tyres, Ferrari just couldn't seem to make them work on Sunday.
Ferrari told him not to push
Because they were worried about how long they could go, to be fair. Just before Leclerc came in Ferrari were telling him it was too soon and would leave too much to do on the Softs. There's no reason to tell him to go easy if they don't have any concerns

User avatar
Johnson
Posts: 1435
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 1:20 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by Johnson »

Mercedes has been the better car quite clearly now, the Ferrari was better only for one race and the driver that extracted its potential that race broke down.

However, Vettel could be so much higher in the WDC table if he himself had got the most out of the car in Bahrain and cruised to a win or at least been in position to take the win once Leclerc broke down.

If Vettel had won Bahrain the WDC table would look like-

BOT 84
HAM 79
VET 67

Vettel just 12 points behind Lewis and 17 off Bottas and in a good position, especially if Ferrari are on form in Spain he could also entirely wipe that lead out.

Instead he is 35 and 34 points behind them and on the edge of falling out of the title race for the near future at least.

ReservoirDog
Posts: 1899
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 11:31 am

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by ReservoirDog »

I think Ferrari is not that far behind the Merc. But whenever there's a possibility of things going either Merc's way or Ferrari's, they always go Merc's way.

Sending their drivers out on mediums in Q2. Another mega dumb decision from Ferrari. Then it just cascaded, leading to a lot of events that changed the complexion of the race. I know it's could a would a should a, but a well-thought out quali plan could've won Ferrari the race. I liked how LeClerk wasn't afraid of blaming low grip on the tires as part of the reason he crashed.

Merc is such a well-run operation, I just can't see Ferrari touching them. Given the same exact car, I'd say Mercedes operations will beat Ferrari operations 4 out of 5 times.

mikeyg123
Posts: 17660
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by mikeyg123 »

Zoue wrote: Because they were worried about how long they could go, to be fair. Just before Leclerc came in Ferrari were telling him it was too soon and would leave too much to do on the Softs. There's no reason to tell him to go easy if they don't have any concerns
Maybe that was a factor. Leclerc said it was because he was told not to push because there was no chance of catching Verstappen anyway.

pokerman
Posts: 35103
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2019 Mercedes vs. Ferrari vs. Red bull

Post by pokerman »

Zoue wrote:
mikeyg123 wrote:
Black_Flag_11 wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote: it happened in the race with Ferrari, Red Bull etc too
Vettel had a problem on the softs which Leclerc may not have had, we saw Vettel have problems with tyres in Australia which didn't affect Leclerc.
I think he clearly did have a problem with the softs in the race. Once he pit for softs he started dropping time to Verstappen, on a fresh set of supposedly faster tyres, Ferrari just couldn't seem to make them work on Sunday.
Ferrari told him not to push
Because they were worried about how long they could go, to be fair. Just before Leclerc came in Ferrari were telling him it was too soon and would leave too much to do on the Softs. There's no reason to tell him to go easy if they don't have any concerns
Then we're simply back to Leclerc's poor strategy he should have gone medium, medium, soft.
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)

Post Reply