2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thread

Forum rules
Please read the forum rules
pokerman
Posts: 35604
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by pokerman »

kleefton wrote:
Rockie wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
AravJ wrote: 2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis
Yes it was very convenient for McLaren to put 100% of the blame onto the Honda engine.
Even Honda admitted their PU was poor. Let's not rewrite history to pretend otherwise.

The point was simply that after having to endure a sub-standard PU for three years, it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for McLaren if Honda started to come good just after they finally walked away, handing a rival all the fruits of their three years of development
So we are just going to pretend that Mclaren using the same engine as redbull now and still look no better than Force India was all Honda.

Considering everyone can tell Redbull is being held back by Renault.

Mclaren was and still is awful fooling people with we have the best chassis only the PU is hoolding us back.
Yeah I don't understand why some people still can't accept that fact. Mclaren most likely never had a good chassis. You could spin it however you want and say that this year is not last year blah blah blah... It doesn't work. The current chassis is miles off the best on the grid, and it's obvious that the Honda cars weren't that good either and not just because of Honda.
Seriously, they need to restructure their whole team. Personally, I may sound harsh, but I think the drivers, Bouiller, Promodou, to name a few, should all be replaced. It is just not working. Just blow up the whole thing and start over with fresh blood.
I don't think that you can blame the drivers.
Lewis Hamilton #44

World Drivers Titles: 7 (1st)
Grand Prix Wins: 94 (1st)
Pole Positions: 97 (1st)
Podiums: 163 (1st)


PF1 Pick 10 Competition
2014: Champion

pokerman
Posts: 35604
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by pokerman »

Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
AravJ wrote: 2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis
Yes it was very convenient for McLaren to put 100% of the blame onto the Honda engine.
Even Honda admitted their PU was poor. Let's not rewrite history to pretend otherwise.

The point was simply that after having to endure a sub-standard PU for three years, it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for McLaren if Honda started to come good just after they finally walked away, handing a rival all the fruits of their three years of development
The Honda PU was preventing McLaren from being a top team?
There's a simple point being made here, which seems to be escaping you and some others. And that's that the Honda PU has been terrible for the last three years - irrespective of any other issues the team may have had - and it would be frustrating for McLaren if, after having had to endure that for three years, Honda finally looked to be getting it right after they divorced and lost Works status. In other words, McLaren would have become Red Bull's development team, which would undoubtedly be frustrating for them.

That's it.
It's questionable that Honda would have improved as much as they have done this year given the design restraints that McLaren gave them?
Lewis Hamilton #44

World Drivers Titles: 7 (1st)
Grand Prix Wins: 94 (1st)
Pole Positions: 97 (1st)
Podiums: 163 (1st)


PF1 Pick 10 Competition
2014: Champion

Zoue
Posts: 25158
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by Zoue »

pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:Yes it was very convenient for McLaren to put 100% of the blame onto the Honda engine.
Even Honda admitted their PU was poor. Let's not rewrite history to pretend otherwise.

The point was simply that after having to endure a sub-standard PU for three years, it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for McLaren if Honda started to come good just after they finally walked away, handing a rival all the fruits of their three years of development
The Honda PU was preventing McLaren from being a top team?
There's a simple point being made here, which seems to be escaping you and some others. And that's that the Honda PU has been terrible for the last three years - irrespective of any other issues the team may have had - and it would be frustrating for McLaren if, after having had to endure that for three years, Honda finally looked to be getting it right after they divorced and lost Works status. In other words, McLaren would have become Red Bull's development team, which would undoubtedly be frustrating for them.

That's it.
It's questionable that Honda would have improved as much as they have done this year given the design restraints that McLaren gave them?
You're looking too deep into it. It's simply an observation that McLaren might have cause to feel frustrated if Honda came good now they have split after the painful last three years.

pokerman
Posts: 35604
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by pokerman »

Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote: Even Honda admitted their PU was poor. Let's not rewrite history to pretend otherwise.

The point was simply that after having to endure a sub-standard PU for three years, it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for McLaren if Honda started to come good just after they finally walked away, handing a rival all the fruits of their three years of development
The Honda PU was preventing McLaren from being a top team?
There's a simple point being made here, which seems to be escaping you and some others. And that's that the Honda PU has been terrible for the last three years - irrespective of any other issues the team may have had - and it would be frustrating for McLaren if, after having had to endure that for three years, Honda finally looked to be getting it right after they divorced and lost Works status. In other words, McLaren would have become Red Bull's development team, which would undoubtedly be frustrating for them.

That's it.
It's questionable that Honda would have improved as much as they have done this year given the design restraints that McLaren gave them?
You're looking too deep into it. It's simply an observation that McLaren might have cause to feel frustrated if Honda came good now they have split after the painful last three years.
It's actual very relevant, Honda were able to find an extra 30hp from the get go just by the extra room they were given by STR for the engine installation.
Lewis Hamilton #44

World Drivers Titles: 7 (1st)
Grand Prix Wins: 94 (1st)
Pole Positions: 97 (1st)
Podiums: 163 (1st)


PF1 Pick 10 Competition
2014: Champion

pokerman
Posts: 35604
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by pokerman »

Stroll looking out of his depth again, much slower than Sirotkin then hits the wall.
Lewis Hamilton #44

World Drivers Titles: 7 (1st)
Grand Prix Wins: 94 (1st)
Pole Positions: 97 (1st)
Podiums: 163 (1st)


PF1 Pick 10 Competition
2014: Champion

dompclarke

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by dompclarke »

pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote: It's questionable that Honda would have improved as much as they have done this year given the design restraints that McLaren gave them?
You're looking too deep into it. It's simply an observation that McLaren might have cause to feel frustrated if Honda came good now they have split after the painful last three years.
It's actual very relevant, Honda were able to find an extra 30hp from the get go just by the extra room they were given by STR for the engine installation.
I've heard this said before, but seen nothing to back it up. Have Honda actually said this or is it just hearsay?
Also if true this is also Hondas fault, they could have told Mclaren they needed the space, can't blame only one party

User avatar
UnlikeUday
Posts: 8545
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:53 pm
Location: Mumbai, India

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by UnlikeUday »

Feel The Fourth

pokerman
Posts: 35604
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by pokerman »

dompclarke wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote: It's questionable that Honda would have improved as much as they have done this year given the design restraints that McLaren gave them?
You're looking too deep into it. It's simply an observation that McLaren might have cause to feel frustrated if Honda came good now they have split after the painful last three years.
It's actual very relevant, Honda were able to find an extra 30hp from the get go just by the extra room they were given by STR for the engine installation.
I've heard this said before, but seen nothing to back it up. Have Honda actually said this or is it just hearsay?
Also if true this is also Hondas fault, they could have told Mclaren they needed the space, can't blame only one party
It's all part of the working relationship which wasn't good, seems better at STR?
Lewis Hamilton #44

World Drivers Titles: 7 (1st)
Grand Prix Wins: 94 (1st)
Pole Positions: 97 (1st)
Podiums: 163 (1st)


PF1 Pick 10 Competition
2014: Champion

User avatar
UnlikeUday
Posts: 8545
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:53 pm
Location: Mumbai, India

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by UnlikeUday »

FP1 done:

Image
Source - www.imgur.com
Feel The Fourth

Siao7
Posts: 8739
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:31 am

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by Siao7 »

pokerman wrote:
dompclarke wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote: It's questionable that Honda would have improved as much as they have done this year given the design restraints that McLaren gave them?
You're looking too deep into it. It's simply an observation that McLaren might have cause to feel frustrated if Honda came good now they have split after the painful last three years.
It's actual very relevant, Honda were able to find an extra 30hp from the get go just by the extra room they were given by STR for the engine installation.
I've heard this said before, but seen nothing to back it up. Have Honda actually said this or is it just hearsay?
Also if true this is also Hondas fault, they could have told Mclaren they needed the space, can't blame only one party
It's all part of the working relationship which wasn't good, seems better at STR?
Do you mean a better relationship or the engines? As recently they had a slump that they partly blame Honda for.

https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/13587 ... -for-slump

We can count the nice position in Monaco as a win for them, but not sure how much Monaco is relevant. We did see an engine winning by having 160bhp less after all.

So lets wait and see.

The one thing that we know is that STR are happier with Honda. But this is not just the performance of the engine, just the way they co-operate with them. In the past they were just customers, not they develop the engine with the manufacturer for the first time.

https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/13488 ... rs-wouldnt

So that may be skewing the image a bit.

dompclarke

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by dompclarke »

pokerman wrote:
dompclarke wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote: It's questionable that Honda would have improved as much as they have done this year given the design restraints that McLaren gave them?
You're looking too deep into it. It's simply an observation that McLaren might have cause to feel frustrated if Honda came good now they have split after the painful last three years.
It's actual very relevant, Honda were able to find an extra 30hp from the get go just by the extra room they were given by STR for the engine installation.
I've heard this said before, but seen nothing to back it up. Have Honda actually said this or is it just hearsay?
Also if true this is also Hondas fault, they could have told Mclaren they needed the space, can't blame only one party
It's all part of the working relationship which wasn't good, seems better at STR?
Which still seems to be hearsay, unless you have any info on either Honda or McLaren saying so...

All I've heard or read are outsiders opinions with no evidence they are correct

User avatar
Alex53
Posts: 933
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:11 am

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by Alex53 »

A Honda engine fastest in the speed trap, Red Bulls 1st and 3rd in an engine heavy circuit...FP1 has me puzzled :)

User avatar
Lotus49
Posts: 5273
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:36 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by Lotus49 »

pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote: Yes it was very convenient for McLaren to put 100% of the blame onto the Honda engine.
Even Honda admitted their PU was poor. Let's not rewrite history to pretend otherwise.

The point was simply that after having to endure a sub-standard PU for three years, it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for McLaren if Honda started to come good just after they finally walked away, handing a rival all the fruits of their three years of development
The Honda PU was preventing McLaren from being a top team?
There's a simple point being made here, which seems to be escaping you and some others. And that's that the Honda PU has been terrible for the last three years - irrespective of any other issues the team may have had - and it would be frustrating for McLaren if, after having had to endure that for three years, Honda finally looked to be getting it right after they divorced and lost Works status. In other words, McLaren would have become Red Bull's development team, which would undoubtedly be frustrating for them.

That's it.
It's questionable that Honda would have improved as much as they have done this year given the design restraints that McLaren gave them?
Like I said the last time you claimed this, McLaren allowed structural changes to the PU in every winter they were together so I don't see why they would suddenly not allow them to?
"Clark came through at the end of the first lap so far ahead that we in the pits were convinced that the rest of the field must have been wiped out in an accident."
-Eddie Dennis, describing the dominance of Jim Clark in the Lotus 49 at Spa 1967

User avatar
Lotus49
Posts: 5273
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:36 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by Lotus49 »

pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote: The Honda PU was preventing McLaren from being a top team?
There's a simple point being made here, which seems to be escaping you and some others. And that's that the Honda PU has been terrible for the last three years - irrespective of any other issues the team may have had - and it would be frustrating for McLaren if, after having had to endure that for three years, Honda finally looked to be getting it right after they divorced and lost Works status. In other words, McLaren would have become Red Bull's development team, which would undoubtedly be frustrating for them.

That's it.
It's questionable that Honda would have improved as much as they have done this year given the design restraints that McLaren gave them?
You're looking too deep into it. It's simply an observation that McLaren might have cause to feel frustrated if Honda came good now they have split after the painful last three years.
It's actual very relevant, Honda were able to find an extra 30hp from the get go just by the extra room they were given by STR for the engine installation.
You mean 10kw(13bhp) from the bigger exhaust manifold? Still no reason why McLaren wouldn't allow them to make a similar change if Honda told them what it would bring.

Doing that might have been tricky though admittedly as Honda called it an "unexpected" gain so if you can't tell your chassis maker what any change will bring how can that chassis maker decide if it's worth the compromise to the car?

Probably a good example of why the McHonda partnership failed actually,Honda are still in a learning phase, more trial and error really whereas McLaren and Alonso were, perhaps foolishly or unfairly, expecting much much more.
"Clark came through at the end of the first lap so far ahead that we in the pits were convinced that the rest of the field must have been wiped out in an accident."
-Eddie Dennis, describing the dominance of Jim Clark in the Lotus 49 at Spa 1967

lucifers
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:33 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by lucifers »

sainz into the wall, red flag

AravJ
Posts: 1033
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:42 am

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by AravJ »

Lotus49 wrote:
You mean 10kw(13bhp) from the bigger exhaust manifold? Still no reason why McLaren wouldn't allow them to make a similar change if Honda told them what it would bring.

Doing that might have been tricky though admittedly as Honda called it an "unexpected" gain so if you can't tell your chassis maker what any change will bring how can that chassis maker decide if it's worth the compromise to the car?

Probably a good example of why the McHonda partnership failed actually,Honda are still in a learning phase, more trial and error really whereas McLaren and Alonso were, perhaps foolishly or unfairly, expecting much much more.


Also foolishly or unfairly expecting Honda could pull the midfield chassis to the front

typaH4okc
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:07 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by typaH4okc »

Canada is a tough track for Sainz

mikeyg123
Posts: 18021
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by mikeyg123 »

AravJ wrote:
Lotus49 wrote:
You mean 10kw(13bhp) from the bigger exhaust manifold? Still no reason why McLaren wouldn't allow them to make a similar change if Honda told them what it would bring.

Doing that might have been tricky though admittedly as Honda called it an "unexpected" gain so if you can't tell your chassis maker what any change will bring how can that chassis maker decide if it's worth the compromise to the car?

Probably a good example of why the McHonda partnership failed actually,Honda are still in a learning phase, more trial and error really whereas McLaren and Alonso were, perhaps foolishly or unfairly, expecting much much more.


Also foolishly or unfairly expecting Honda could pull the midfield chassis to the front
I think they just expected an engine that could at least deploy all the way down the straight and not last two races when it needed to last 5. :-|

F1_Ernie
Posts: 3752
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 8:52 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by F1_Ernie »

Reliability showing again why Ricciardo can't win this championship, it's a shame really.
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2016: 24th place
2017: 4th place
2018: 12th place

Wins: Spain 2016, Canada 2017, Malaysia 2017
Podiums: 2nd Germany 2016, 3rd Mexico 2016, 3rd China 2018, 3rd Japan 2018, 2nd Mexico 2018

lucifers
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:33 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by lucifers »

redbull looking fast here
Last edited by lucifers on Fri Jun 08, 2018 6:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Zoue
Posts: 25158
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by Zoue »

pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote: The Honda PU was preventing McLaren from being a top team?
There's a simple point being made here, which seems to be escaping you and some others. And that's that the Honda PU has been terrible for the last three years - irrespective of any other issues the team may have had - and it would be frustrating for McLaren if, after having had to endure that for three years, Honda finally looked to be getting it right after they divorced and lost Works status. In other words, McLaren would have become Red Bull's development team, which would undoubtedly be frustrating for them.

That's it.
It's questionable that Honda would have improved as much as they have done this year given the design restraints that McLaren gave them?
You're looking too deep into it. It's simply an observation that McLaren might have cause to feel frustrated if Honda came good now they have split after the painful last three years.
It's actual very relevant, Honda were able to find an extra 30hp from the get go just by the extra room they were given by STR for the engine installation.
It's not relevant at all. I don't know how else to say it, so I'll just leave it at that :?

User avatar
moby
Posts: 8072
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 9:22 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by moby »

dompclarke wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote: It's questionable that Honda would have improved as much as they have done this year given the design restraints that McLaren gave them?
You're looking too deep into it. It's simply an observation that McLaren might have cause to feel frustrated if Honda came good now they have split after the painful last three years.
It's actual very relevant, Honda were able to find an extra 30hp from the get go just by the extra room they were given by STR for the engine installation.
I've heard this said before, but seen nothing to back it up. Have Honda actually said this or is it just hearsay?
Also if true this is also Hondas fault, they could have told Mclaren they needed the space, can't blame only one party
I think I recall reading it was because STR allowed Honda room to fit a 'log' exhaust.
I just googled but can not find an article so maybe it was 'made up'

pokerman
Posts: 35604
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by pokerman »

I hate driver coaching, telling Stroll how to drive the track.
Lewis Hamilton #44

World Drivers Titles: 7 (1st)
Grand Prix Wins: 94 (1st)
Pole Positions: 97 (1st)
Podiums: 163 (1st)


PF1 Pick 10 Competition
2014: Champion

pokerman
Posts: 35604
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by pokerman »

Lotus49 wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote: There's a simple point being made here, which seems to be escaping you and some others. And that's that the Honda PU has been terrible for the last three years - irrespective of any other issues the team may have had - and it would be frustrating for McLaren if, after having had to endure that for three years, Honda finally looked to be getting it right after they divorced and lost Works status. In other words, McLaren would have become Red Bull's development team, which would undoubtedly be frustrating for them.

That's it.
It's questionable that Honda would have improved as much as they have done this year given the design restraints that McLaren gave them?
You're looking too deep into it. It's simply an observation that McLaren might have cause to feel frustrated if Honda came good now they have split after the painful last three years.
It's actual very relevant, Honda were able to find an extra 30hp from the get go just by the extra room they were given by STR for the engine installation.
You mean 10kw(13bhp) from the bigger exhaust manifold? Still no reason why McLaren wouldn't allow them to make a similar change if Honda told them what it would bring.

Doing that might have been tricky though admittedly as Honda called it an "unexpected" gain so if you can't tell your chassis maker what any change will bring how can that chassis maker decide if it's worth the compromise to the car?

Probably a good example of why the McHonda partnership failed actually,Honda are still in a learning phase, more trial and error really whereas McLaren and Alonso were, perhaps foolishly or unfairly, expecting much much more.
Yes it was to do with the extra room they had for the exhaust.
Lewis Hamilton #44

World Drivers Titles: 7 (1st)
Grand Prix Wins: 94 (1st)
Pole Positions: 97 (1st)
Podiums: 163 (1st)


PF1 Pick 10 Competition
2014: Champion

Noni
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2017 9:08 am

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by Noni »

Top speed goes to, as this fella goes off track!.... :lol:

Image

pokerman
Posts: 35604
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by pokerman »

Vandoorne driving like crazy trying to keep up with Alonso.
Lewis Hamilton #44

World Drivers Titles: 7 (1st)
Grand Prix Wins: 94 (1st)
Pole Positions: 97 (1st)
Podiums: 163 (1st)


PF1 Pick 10 Competition
2014: Champion

sandman1347
Posts: 6977
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 7:55 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by sandman1347 »

This will be an important weekend for Hamilton. I think the Merc will be at a disadvantage against all of these upgraded power units out there. This will be an important damage limitation weekend. It also happens to be probably his strongest circuit. If he can make the difference here and buy the team some additional time to complete the new PU upgrades, it will be huge for his championship. Mercedes already seem to have the most reliable engine. They just need to make performance gains.

JN23
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:14 am

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by JN23 »

Did Hamilton really do his best lap on the super soft as the graphic suggests?

pokerman
Posts: 35604
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by pokerman »

Vettel struggling or sand bagging?
Lewis Hamilton #44

World Drivers Titles: 7 (1st)
Grand Prix Wins: 94 (1st)
Pole Positions: 97 (1st)
Podiums: 163 (1st)


PF1 Pick 10 Competition
2014: Champion

JN23
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:14 am

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by JN23 »

pokerman wrote:Vettel struggling or sand bagging?
He had traffic a couple of times I think and he hasn't done many laps for some reason in either session I don't think. Expect he'll be there or thereabouts come qualifying though.

lucifers
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:33 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by lucifers »

JN23 wrote:Did Hamilton really do his best lap on the super soft as the graphic suggests?
yes, quite early in the session too

JN23
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:14 am

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by JN23 »

lucifers wrote:
JN23 wrote:Did Hamilton really do his best lap on the super soft as the graphic suggests?
yes, quite early in the session too
Interesting. No idea what to read into this session :lol:

pokerman
Posts: 35604
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by pokerman »

JN23 wrote:
lucifers wrote:
JN23 wrote:Did Hamilton really do his best lap on the super soft as the graphic suggests?
yes, quite early in the session too
Interesting. No idea what to read into this session :lol:
Yes Sky have just confirmed it.
Lewis Hamilton #44

World Drivers Titles: 7 (1st)
Grand Prix Wins: 94 (1st)
Pole Positions: 97 (1st)
Podiums: 163 (1st)


PF1 Pick 10 Competition
2014: Champion

pokerman
Posts: 35604
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by pokerman »

JN23 wrote:
pokerman wrote:Vettel struggling or sand bagging?
He had traffic a couple of times I think and he hasn't done many laps for some reason in either session I don't think. Expect he'll be there or thereabouts come qualifying though.
He had a big set up change, he is known for sand bagging though.
Lewis Hamilton #44

World Drivers Titles: 7 (1st)
Grand Prix Wins: 94 (1st)
Pole Positions: 97 (1st)
Podiums: 163 (1st)


PF1 Pick 10 Competition
2014: Champion

User avatar
Lotus49
Posts: 5273
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:36 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by Lotus49 »

AravJ wrote:
Lotus49 wrote:
You mean 10kw(13bhp) from the bigger exhaust manifold? Still no reason why McLaren wouldn't allow them to make a similar change if Honda told them what it would bring.

Doing that might have been tricky though admittedly as Honda called it an "unexpected" gain so if you can't tell your chassis maker what any change will bring how can that chassis maker decide if it's worth the compromise to the car?

Probably a good example of why the McHonda partnership failed actually,Honda are still in a learning phase, more trial and error really whereas McLaren and Alonso were, perhaps foolishly or unfairly, expecting much much more.


Also foolishly or unfairly expecting Honda could pull the midfield chassis to the front
Not really, Alonso said they lacked to the top guys more than once. Unfortunately he also said they had "one of the best" so predictably the "one" was dropped and that's all anyone chooses to remember which is neither McLaren or Alonso's problem really.

Plus we had 3 different chassis's during the McHonda era so which is it or are we expected to believe now that they are the only team to suffer no variance in performance chassis wise during this time?

I'm going to guess it's the latter to go along with the ridiculous picking and choosing of what Alonso quotes are supposed to sum up McLaren's view on their own chassis recently.
"Clark came through at the end of the first lap so far ahead that we in the pits were convinced that the rest of the field must have been wiped out in an accident."
-Eddie Dennis, describing the dominance of Jim Clark in the Lotus 49 at Spa 1967

davidheath461
Posts: 2000
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 4:11 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by davidheath461 »

pokerman wrote:
JN23 wrote:
pokerman wrote:Vettel struggling or sand bagging?
He had traffic a couple of times I think and he hasn't done many laps for some reason in either session I don't think. Expect he'll be there or thereabouts come qualifying though.
He had a big set up change, he is known for sand bagging though.
:thumbup:

Kimi looks quick without the engine upgrade and this is one of Kimi's worst circuits. Vettel will stick it on pole in Q3 "against all odds".

User avatar
Lotus49
Posts: 5273
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:36 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by Lotus49 »

moby wrote:
dompclarke wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote: It's questionable that Honda would have improved as much as they have done this year given the design restraints that McLaren gave them?
You're looking too deep into it. It's simply an observation that McLaren might have cause to feel frustrated if Honda came good now they have split after the painful last three years.
It's actual very relevant, Honda were able to find an extra 30hp from the get go just by the extra room they were given by STR for the engine installation.
I've heard this said before, but seen nothing to back it up. Have Honda actually said this or is it just hearsay?
Also if true this is also Hondas fault, they could have told Mclaren they needed the space, can't blame only one party
I think I recall reading it was because STR allowed Honda room to fit a 'log' exhaust.
I just googled but can not find an article so maybe it was 'made up'
There was room left in the STR chassis where Renault took up more space in that area so Honda increased the size of the manifold and got an unexpected power bump from it.

Not 30bhp though, but 13bhp.
"Clark came through at the end of the first lap so far ahead that we in the pits were convinced that the rest of the field must have been wiped out in an accident."
-Eddie Dennis, describing the dominance of Jim Clark in the Lotus 49 at Spa 1967

Zoue
Posts: 25158
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by Zoue »

davidheath461 wrote:
pokerman wrote:
JN23 wrote:
pokerman wrote:Vettel struggling or sand bagging?
He had traffic a couple of times I think and he hasn't done many laps for some reason in either session I don't think. Expect he'll be there or thereabouts come qualifying though.
He had a big set up change, he is known for sand bagging though.
:thumbup:

Kimi looks quick without the engine upgrade and this is one of Kimi's worst circuits. Vettel will stick it on pole in Q3 "against all odds".
One of his worst, really? He won it in 2005 after starting from 7th place, a record only bettered once, I believe, and shares the record for number of fastest laps here with Michael Schumacher. He has only ever not finished in the points once in all the years he's raced here, and that was courtesy of a certain Mr "Woodeneye" who crashed into the back of him in the pits and took him out of the race in 2008.

I don't think his record here is that terrible

Zoue
Posts: 25158
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by Zoue »

Lotus49 wrote:
moby wrote:
dompclarke wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote: You're looking too deep into it. It's simply an observation that McLaren might have cause to feel frustrated if Honda came good now they have split after the painful last three years.
It's actual very relevant, Honda were able to find an extra 30hp from the get go just by the extra room they were given by STR for the engine installation.
I've heard this said before, but seen nothing to back it up. Have Honda actually said this or is it just hearsay?
Also if true this is also Hondas fault, they could have told Mclaren they needed the space, can't blame only one party
I think I recall reading it was because STR allowed Honda room to fit a 'log' exhaust.
I just googled but can not find an article so maybe it was 'made up'
There was room left in the STR chassis where Renault took up more space in that area so Honda increased the size of the manifold and got an unexpected power bump from it.

Not 30bhp though, but 13bhp.
I think the unexpected part is a pretty salient point. McLaren can hardly be accused of holding them back there when even Honda weren't aware of the potential gains to be made

User avatar
Black_Flag_11
Posts: 8040
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 1:05 pm

Re: 2018 Canadian Grand Prix Free Practice & Qualifying Thre

Post by Black_Flag_11 »

pokerman wrote:I hate driver coaching, telling Stroll how to drive the track.
I don't really mind it. If they aren't told when they're on track they get the info inbetween runs anyway.

You can put Stroll in a Mercedes, tell him to brake, turn in and get on the power at the same points Hamilton does, he still won't beat him. Knowing how to do something and actually being able to do it are two very different things.

Post Reply