Massive disappointment.mikeyg123 wrote:This is awful for Mclaren.
Its clear that it's not the engine
Massive disappointment.mikeyg123 wrote:This is awful for Mclaren.
Or Toro Rosso have the best chassissandman1347 wrote:The Honda engine is clearly performing well. That cannot be denied at this point.
Or Gasly is better than Alonso!JN23 wrote:Or Toro Rosso have the best chassissandman1347 wrote:The Honda engine is clearly performing well. That cannot be denied at this point.
You guys are hilarious.UnlikeUday wrote:Or Gasly is better than Alonso!JN23 wrote:Or Toro Rosso have the best chassissandman1347 wrote:The Honda engine is clearly performing well. That cannot be denied at this point.
Something I did not expect to be written this season.kleefton wrote:Honda best of the rest indeed.
That would make two of us.Altair wrote:Something I did not expect to be written this season.kleefton wrote:Honda best of the rest indeed.
Maybe all 3!!UnlikeUday wrote:Is:
Gasly that good OR
Toro Rosso that good OR
Honda that good?
It's probably not a chassis thing. It's clear that straight line speed is their strength. They have been extremely fast through the traps in both races and they have been much more competitive at this power circuit than they were at Melbourne. The Honda engine seems pretty good. Hard to believe I know and it's likely that the qualifying performance of the engine is superior to the sustainable race performance but so far so good.PRFAN wrote:Maybe all 3!!UnlikeUday wrote:Is:
Gasly that good OR
Toro Rosso that good OR
Honda that good?
Will keep an eye on the kid, he performed well today!
TR has a history of delivering competitive chassis
Maybe Honda has turned the corner!
McLaren a bit exposed today!
could be a fluke.UnlikeUday wrote:Is:
Gasly that good OR
Toro Rosso that good OR
Honda that good?
They're only one of 4 teams with a full chassis dyno which means testing 24/7. It's absolutely a chassis thing, it's a slippy one alright. Peak power was getting ok for Honda after Monza and Alo was usually in Q3 but it's efficiency and reliability was where they still lack.sandman1347 wrote:It's probably not a chassis thing. It's clear that straight line speed is their strength. They have been extremely fast through the traps in both races and they have been much more competitive at this power circuit than they were at Melbourne. The Honda engine seems pretty good. Hard to believe I know and it's likely that the qualifying performance of the engine is superior to the sustainable race performance but so far so good.PRFAN wrote:Maybe all 3!!UnlikeUday wrote:Is:
Gasly that good OR
Toro Rosso that good OR
Honda that good?
Will keep an eye on the kid, he performed well today!
TR has a history of delivering competitive chassis
Maybe Honda has turned the corner!
McLaren a bit exposed today!
I'm calling a RBR works deal for the near future.
Not a fluke, just suits them down to the ground. Opposite of McLaren which seems to have the aero efficiency of a London Bus, at least around here.Altair wrote:could be a fluke.UnlikeUday wrote:Is:
Gasly that good OR
Toro Rosso that good OR
Honda that good?
I will need a few more races before I fall for the hype.
Haas looked like world beaters in Australia, couldn't get one of their drivers out of Q1 this time.
Imagine what they could do with a Mercedes engine?JN23 wrote:Or Toro Rosso have the best chassissandman1347 wrote:The Honda engine is clearly performing well. That cannot be denied at this point.
Dunno, but I can hardly wait for the Monza race, and already wishing it's a wet weekend!UnlikeUday wrote:Is:
Gasly that good OR
Toro Rosso that good OR
Honda that good?
Honda's best qualifying position in the Hybrid era.UnlikeUday wrote:Hamilton 9th, Gasly 5th etc.
KMag qualified 7thAltair wrote:could be a fluke.UnlikeUday wrote:Is:
Gasly that good OR
Toro Rosso that good OR
Honda that good?
I will need a few more races before I fall for the hype.
Haas looked like world beaters in Australia, couldn't get one of their drivers out of Q1 this time.
Fixedpokerman wrote:Honda's best dry qualifying position in the Hybrid era.UnlikeUday wrote:Hamilton 9th, Gasly 5th etc.
Straight line speed that they blamed entirely on the Honda engine last year.Lotus49 wrote:Not a fluke, just suits them down to the ground. Opposite of McLaren which seems to have the aero efficiency of a London Bus, at least around here.Altair wrote:could be a fluke.UnlikeUday wrote:Is:
Gasly that good OR
Toro Rosso that good OR
Honda that good?
I will need a few more races before I fall for the hype.
Haas looked like world beaters in Australia, couldn't get one of their drivers out of Q1 this time.
I was just repeating what I heard, I wouldn't have a clue myself.Lotus49 wrote:Fixedpokerman wrote:Honda's best dry qualifying position in the Hybrid era.UnlikeUday wrote:Hamilton 9th, Gasly 5th etc.
Tale of two cars/drivers for sure.pokerman wrote:KMag qualified 7thAltair wrote:could be a fluke.UnlikeUday wrote:Is:
Gasly that good OR
Toro Rosso that good OR
Honda that good?
I will need a few more races before I fall for the hype.
Haas looked like world beaters in Australia, couldn't get one of their drivers out of Q1 this time.
Yep Grosjean was basically rubbishAltair wrote:Tale of two cars/drivers for sure.pokerman wrote:KMag qualified 7thAltair wrote:could be a fluke.UnlikeUday wrote:Is:
Gasly that good OR
Toro Rosso that good OR
Honda that good?
I will need a few more races before I fall for the hype.
Haas looked like world beaters in Australia, couldn't get one of their drivers out of Q1 this time.
At what point though wasn't it? They didn't have full ers deployment until Monza for example so for x amount of seconds a lap they lost all ers support.pokerman wrote:Straight line speed that they blamed entirely on the Honda engine last year.Lotus49 wrote:Not a fluke, just suits them down to the ground. Opposite of McLaren which seems to have the aero efficiency of a London Bus, at least around here.Altair wrote:could be a fluke.UnlikeUday wrote:Is:
Gasly that good OR
Toro Rosso that good OR
Honda that good?
I will need a few more races before I fall for the hype.
Haas looked like world beaters in Australia, couldn't get one of their drivers out of Q1 this time.
At this point it's obvious Hamilton put in a ferocious lap in qualifying there while Vettel wasn't particularly comfortable all weekend. Nothing new in this forum. Even last year we had several posters acting like the Mercedes was still at 2014 levels of dominance. People are slow to take in new information.pokerman wrote:This just shows what an over reaction there was to Australian qualifying, unfair party mode etc.
Nah having really low drag is a big factor but you need power too. I know it hurts man but you have to admit that the Honda unit has performed well both in terms of power and reliability so far. I'm not saying it's the best but give them some credit man.Lotus49 wrote:They're only one of 4 teams with a full chassis dyno which means testing 24/7. It's absolutely a chassis thing, it's a slippy one alright. Peak power was getting ok for Honda after Monza and Alo was usually in Q3 but it's efficiency and reliability was where they still lack.sandman1347 wrote:It's probably not a chassis thing. It's clear that straight line speed is their strength. They have been extremely fast through the traps in both races and they have been much more competitive at this power circuit than they were at Melbourne. The Honda engine seems pretty good. Hard to believe I know and it's likely that the qualifying performance of the engine is superior to the sustainable race performance but so far so good.PRFAN wrote:Maybe all 3!!UnlikeUday wrote:Is:
Gasly that good OR
Toro Rosso that good OR
Honda that good?
Will keep an eye on the kid, he performed well today!
TR has a history of delivering competitive chassis
Maybe Honda has turned the corner!
McLaren a bit exposed today!
I'm calling a RBR works deal for the near future.
Obviously Honda are still improving no argument there but that STR is slick in a straight line, it's been evident since winter testing and this track suits it.
Honda changed engines this weekend. I don't think reliability is up there at allsandman1347 wrote:Nah having really low drag is a big factor but you need power too. I know it hurts man but you have to admit that the Honda unit has performed well both in terms of power and reliability so far. I'm not saying it's the best but give them some credit man.Lotus49 wrote:They're only one of 4 teams with a full chassis dyno which means testing 24/7. It's absolutely a chassis thing, it's a slippy one alright. Peak power was getting ok for Honda after Monza and Alo was usually in Q3 but it's efficiency and reliability was where they still lack.sandman1347 wrote:It's probably not a chassis thing. It's clear that straight line speed is their strength. They have been extremely fast through the traps in both races and they have been much more competitive at this power circuit than they were at Melbourne. The Honda engine seems pretty good. Hard to believe I know and it's likely that the qualifying performance of the engine is superior to the sustainable race performance but so far so good.PRFAN wrote:Maybe all 3!!UnlikeUday wrote:Is:
Gasly that good OR
Toro Rosso that good OR
Honda that good?
Will keep an eye on the kid, he performed well today!
TR has a history of delivering competitive chassis
Maybe Honda has turned the corner!
McLaren a bit exposed today!
I'm calling a RBR works deal for the near future.
Obviously Honda are still improving no argument there but that STR is slick in a straight line, it's been evident since winter testing and this track suits it.