Re: 2015 Malaysian Grand Prix Qualifying Thread
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2015 10:02 am
Pole will be set on slick tyres
Any reason in particular for that request?flyboy10 wrote:Should be any benefit be given to drivers in each Q session to carry forward to the next one? Seems like it doesn't shake things up enough if one driver heads the time sheets in Q1 or Q2 and then everything just gets reset for Q3.
Didn't it say at the earliest 18:15Saz wrote:Qualifying starts again 18:15 local time. So another 15 or so mins.
Yes because they don't run Monsoon wets anymoreflyboy10 wrote:Are these conditions really too bad for full wets?
If they were out they would be on inters now.pokerman wrote:Yes because they don't run Monsoon wets anymoreflyboy10 wrote:Are these conditions really too bad for full wets?
Whoops!mds wrote:According to the official F1 app there's another rookie debuting today:
It's giving me the sh$t's. Ric was Othmds wrote:According to the official F1 app there's another rookie debuting today:
Yep. I've seen lots of quali sessions where a driver who'd normally be at the front will barely scrape through to Q1 or Q2 and then end up on pole - which is fine the way the current rules stand and I just thought it might be a way to make the performance in Q1 and/or Q2 count more towards the overall grid positions while still retaining the element of the three-session shoot-out.pokerman wrote:Any reason in particular for that request?flyboy10 wrote:Should be any benefit be given to drivers in each Q session to carry forward to the next one? Seems like it doesn't shake things up enough if one driver heads the time sheets in Q1 or Q2 and then everything just gets reset for Q3.
Race is starting earlier tomorrow than quali today for that reason.Mercedes-Benz wrote:They should never start during evening just because more people can watch rather which are the best condition for racing without wasting time of everyone. I really hope there is no thunder storm tomorrow
Inters will be faster by the second flyer.Saz wrote:seems to be a split between inters and full wets. should be intresting.
Your coverage is a lot better than ours .Saz wrote:seems to be a split between inters and full wets. should be intresting.
If you change the rules then you change how drivers approach the qualifyingflyboy10 wrote:Yep. I've seen lots of quali sessions where a driver who'd normally be at the front will barely scrape through to Q1 or Q2 and then end up on pole - which is fine the way the current rules stand and I just thought it might be a way to make the performance in Q1 and/or Q2 count more towards the overall grid positions while still retaining the element of the three-session shoot-out.pokerman wrote:Any reason in particular for that request?flyboy10 wrote:Should be any benefit be given to drivers in each Q session to carry forward to the next one? Seems like it doesn't shake things up enough if one driver heads the time sheets in Q1 or Q2 and then everything just gets reset for Q3.
I think we all would like the grids to be a bit more messed up for the sake of a better race spectacle and this might be a way to achieve it when the conditions conspire to change the order.
The race is 2 hours earlierMercedes-Benz wrote:They should never start during evening just because more people can watch. I really hope there is no thunder storm tomorrow
But you won't change what the weather does or mistakes that the team or drivers make. Kimi still stuffed up today and it was clear that getting out near the front of the queue was the right thing to do.pokerman wrote:If you change the rules then you change how drivers approach the qualifyingflyboy10 wrote:Yep. I've seen lots of quali sessions where a driver who'd normally be at the front will barely scrape through to Q1 or Q2 and then end up on pole - which is fine the way the current rules stand and I just thought it might be a way to make the performance in Q1 and/or Q2 count more towards the overall grid positions while still retaining the element of the three-session shoot-out.pokerman wrote:Any reason in particular for that request?flyboy10 wrote:Should be any benefit be given to drivers in each Q session to carry forward to the next one? Seems like it doesn't shake things up enough if one driver heads the time sheets in Q1 or Q2 and then everything just gets reset for Q3.
I think we all would like the grids to be a bit more messed up for the sake of a better race spectacle and this might be a way to achieve it when the conditions conspire to change the order.
Rules don't get changed just to suit individual preferences at the timeflyboy10 wrote:But you won't change what the weather does or mistakes that the team or drivers make. Kimi still stuffed up today and it was clear that getting out near the front of the queue was the right thing to do.pokerman wrote:If you change the rules then you change how drivers approach the qualifyingflyboy10 wrote:Yep. I've seen lots of quali sessions where a driver who'd normally be at the front will barely scrape through to Q1 or Q2 and then end up on pole - which is fine the way the current rules stand and I just thought it might be a way to make the performance in Q1 and/or Q2 count more towards the overall grid positions while still retaining the element of the three-session shoot-out.pokerman wrote:Any reason in particular for that request?flyboy10 wrote:Should be any benefit be given to drivers in each Q session to carry forward to the next one? Seems like it doesn't shake things up enough if one driver heads the time sheets in Q1 or Q2 and then everything just gets reset for Q3.
I think we all would like the grids to be a bit more messed up for the sake of a better race spectacle and this might be a way to achieve it when the conditions conspire to change the order.