F1Oz wrote:Good race, but clearly DR superior to SV in Germany in ANY objective analysis
Yet, Seb finished ahead.
pubpokerplayer wrote:Kevin McDonald wrote:According to Brundle, it couldn't be a total brake failure.
You can see it isn't a total brake failure. The fronts locked.
zaar wrote:Ricciardo four tenths faster than Vettel again.
Ev0lutionz wrote:Well, Hamilton in 2012 basically has served many 5 sec penalties thanks to the inefficient Mclaren pitcrew..
pubpokerplayer wrote:Kevin McDonald wrote:Hamilton's sounding like a petulant child.
You sounding like a whining child.
Seriously guys you complaining about Hamilton sounds damn childish to. Everything he does brings a complaint grow the hell up.
wolfie81 wrote:I must say it is so good to see his car problems occurring. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy!
wolfie81 wrote:Seanie wrote:wolfie81 wrote:haha Lewis implying he thinks it was intentional with his 'no response'.
Funny that, considering he's not seen it yet.
Does not take a genius to put 2+2 together.
LKS1 wrote:And I still want to know why Nico wasn't given the best chance of winning quali - i.e. the later final lap?
pokerman wrote:He as down on sector one then parked it in sector 2, make of it what you wish
Clarky wrote:I dont believe the Vettel problem is anywhere as big as Sky are making it.
smoothcrim wrote:4/10 Vettel and he was on the track later.
Not good for Vettel.
Clarky wrote:Hamilton pits when his lap would have possibly been fastest, was just 1/1000 of through sector 2
jrwb6e wrote:Because he doesn't have to push the car anywhere near 100% with a substandard teammate and no other cars at his machine's level of pace.