You missed an important point in my posts. I dont get ESPN and never will.mcdo wrote:
Actually you know what, stick to what you know. Enjoy ESPN
Clear enough?
You missed an important point in my posts. I dont get ESPN and never will.mcdo wrote:
Actually you know what, stick to what you know. Enjoy ESPN
Yep, well said. Plenty of people want to paint Hamilton in the worst possible light as often as they can.Ennis wrote:Well, once again the actual quotes carry a completely different tone to those in the original post.
Nothing stays the same, but the artificial ending of Hobbs & Machett's career still stinks pretty bad.Blinky McSquinty wrote:Time moves on, nothing stays the same. I'm sure some recall Murray Walker, and others remember this.
Completely right. 100% spot on.Exediron wrote:
I strongly disagree that the previous logo was not memorable, and I strongly disagree that this one is. It looks like any other bland, overly rounded and simplified logo of the social media age.
And the tires back then lasted several GP's. No need for hyperultraincredibly soft tires back then.Blinky McSquinty wrote:In the 60's hippies took LSD to see so many colors.
Or a season opener, or anywhere else in the season. What a dreadful race.Badgeronimous wrote:Yas Marinas, a track where money was no object..... made absolutely soulless and nearly always boring.
It is a terrible choice for season finale.
Raikkonen has been utterly embarrassing for years now. Today is nothing different.BMWSauber84 wrote:Did Raikkonen have any mechanical issues? He was miles behind Vettel when both had clear races. If that is pure performance then it's embarassing.
Why isn't Ferrari doing anything?lucifers wrote:Stroll vs grojean giving us some entertainment cause the Mercedes boys sure as hell won't
He had the chance to give the place back and declined to do so. It's all his fault that he has a time penalty.pokerman wrote:I don't agree with the 5 second penalty for the Hulk, he should give the place back, this is like tactical penalties.