schumi8 wrote:Looks like its Mercedes for championship if they can keep it this way.

and after a few months

Formula1Fan. wrote:wtf has gone wrong at Merc?

I'm a Schumi fan and I feel very disappointed. It seems that 2010 was only an one off for this Brackey team. They don't have the winning DNA at all.

Hungary...such a borefest. I even didn't pay attention to the race. The first time this year. And it happens every year. It was just like watching a practice session. (Yes I know the pit stop strategy and all was "interesting" in some way, but, it's still dire...)

I completely agree that it's Grosjean's fault. He is very reckless and has limited racing skill IMO

Inappropriate post removed.

macfan74318 wrote: Also he is under investigation for the 1st lap incident with Grosjean, if he gets a penalty he should just not bother even showing up

macfan74318

It's Grosjean to get the penalty, I'm sure

the one who posted the big photos deserved to be banned. for God's sake

Breaking News. Ferrari ordered HRT to crash into Button and Vettel or it could be that they ordered Vettel and Button to crash into the HRT. Ferrari also ordered grosion to crash into schumi. Ferrari also ordered the rain to come. Cant beleive this Tread is still going on. You guys really crack me ...

I start to have doubts about your ethics. You can easily blame people for anything and destroy many peoples careers by making false allegations and say that they need need to prove that you are wrong. What we have seen in TV and in interviews showed nothing about any secret agreement between Sauber...

You're supposed to make arguments based on facts . The burden of proof is on your side. Well-articulated assumptions aren't proof. that why there are 5 possibilities Falb has pointed out. That's quite a strong argument. IMO the 4th one can be the highest possibility. There can't be a firm conclusio...

dizlexik wrote: They are all assumptions

this is quite easy to say. of course what all we make are assumptions. what other else are we expected to make? these are very good and strong grounded assumptions from Falb.

It's less complicated for Sauber to make a call because Perez was P2, around 3 sec behind Alonso, and faster than him. So, just cover him and Perez would be good, wouldn't him? Only one opponent, and the race was approaching the end. 1 pit to go. Just cover him. McLaren case was at a chaotic time i...

Blake wrote:

g.trung wrote:
And with that kind of teams relationship, especially regarding Ferrari, you can never get a black-and-white for a conclusion.

baloney

why?

McLaren has made some stupid calls, every team has, surely Sauber is able to make a bad call? I can very well understand why they wanted to play it safe. Your possibility is the least likely i can think of, but why pick that one then? I really can't see anything unusual about the radiocall either??...

[ OK. So, Peter Sauber got a phone call from Dom and he was "ordered" to tell Sergio to slow down. Then, Herr Sauber let Sergio take all the risks he could (which could easily lead to Pérez destroying the best Sauber finish position ever), until he caught the Ferrari, and then he was instructed to ...

Then you're contradicting yourself about "Sauber not covering Fernando tyre change", because this was way before the Pérez pushed to catch Fernando and obviously before the radio call, so your only "obscure" point is the message itself. And the message only said, litteraly, "Hey, Checo, be careful ...

And there is one even more dubious point regarding your post: If they were not going to win, why the hell did Pérez push like a mad, setting lap record after lap record, when his second place was not in danger? BTW, the radio call wasn't ambiguous at all, the message was very clear: "don't do stupi...

No, after all Red Bull is the owner of Torro Rosso. That's obivous. From a few youtube-clips it's also fairly obivous that Torro Rosso drivers are expected to get out of the way if they are about to get lapped by a RB. So it's plausible that Torro Rosso will make it a bit harder for a McLaren to pa...

It's still true. That my threepoints argument is just assumptions is exactly the point..! This whole conspiracytheory is based on assumptions, which is why it's so stupid. The point is that when you base a theory on so many assumptions, the chance is that it's probably wrong. Extraordinary claims r...

Petruchio wrote:
Kinda reminds me of the Piquet Jr crash (Alonso win) and the "conspiracy" thread afterwards. People like you were laughing there donkeys off... and guess what?

+1

I assume you got the point that my original post was just a sarcastic way of saying: "Fack, you are really really stupid". Regardless of how many post i read from him, i will still think that his opinion, and any who shares his opinion on this matter is really stupid. His previous posts has nothing...

RacingFan1 wrote:Luis Perez Sala, former spanish driver, quote about Alonso:

"If God went out of heavens and came down to earth, and he drove an F1 car, he would drive just like Fernando"

He would drive like Sato
j/k

He's a very good driver yes, but if Perez had overtook him today, Alonso wouldn't has look that brilliant. Of course to finish 2nd in that car is quite an achievement, still.

lol

Maybe the conspiracy brigade should blame Maldonados crash in Aus also on Ferrari team orders. Oh but wait that will be a problem because he drives a Renault. So was it maybe Lotus Renault team orders for Maldonado to crash so Raikonen could finish higher. I know its a difficult pill to swallow whe...

Perez went wide and risked spinning out or damaging his car. That's not how you give a race to someone if you want to do it on purpose. Isn't it the same way Massa helped Kimi in 2007 and few others did the same later? ;) I mean how else he could do that? By purposely slowing down on straight? And ...

First race was a 50/50 racing incident. Second race was a slip up in changeable conditions.. If it slaps it out in the 5th lap next race, then I'll start doubting his race cred he hit Schumi and beached his car a while after that, 2 separated incidents, so there was 2 slips up already Hitting schum...

Sevenfest wrote:First race was a 50/50 racing incident. Second race was a slip up in changeable conditions..

If it slaps it out in the 5th lap next race, then I'll start doubting his race cred

he hit Schumi and beached his car a while after that, 2 separated incidents, so there was 2 slips up already

Anyone has an opinion about him. In the first race he crashed. Now he just has ruined Schumi's race and beached the car himself. Race like a rookie?